Circlfi-MCP
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Circlfi-MCPWhat is the intrinsic value of AAPL?"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
CirclFi MCP Server
The official Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for CirclFi — the institutional-grade equity valuation platform.
Give any AI assistant direct access to 13 valuation models across 5,900+ US stocks, recalculated daily from SEC EDGAR, FRED, and GDELT data. Intrinsic values, Quality of Company scores (32 fundamental signals), and Value Trap risk scores — as native AI tools.
Two ways to connect
Option A — Remote server (no install, works everywhere)
Point any MCP-compatible client at the hosted endpoint:
https://circlfi.com/mcpTransport: Streamable HTTP (stateless), current MCP spec
Auth: none needed for the free tier. Premium subscribers send their Gumroad purchase email as a bearer token:
Authorization: Bearer you@example.comWorks with ChatGPT connectors (developer mode), Claude custom connectors (web/desktop), agent frameworks, and any cloud client that can't run local processes.
Option B — Local stdio server (npm)
npx -y circlfi-mcp(Installing from GitHub also works: npx -y github:negm17111995/Circlfi-MCP)
Related MCP server: Toolstem MCP Server
Install in your client
Add to claude_desktop_config.json (macOS: ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json, Windows: %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"circlfi": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "circlfi-mcp"],
"env": { "CIRCLFI_EMAIL": "" }
}
}
}Restart Claude Desktop and look for the tools icon. Premium subscribers: put your Gumroad purchase email in CIRCLFI_EMAIL.
claude mcp add circlfi -- npx -y circlfi-mcpOr with premium access:
claude mcp add circlfi -e CIRCLFI_EMAIL=you@example.com -- npx -y circlfi-mcpOr add to ~/.cursor/mcp.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"circlfi": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "circlfi-mcp"] }
}
}code --add-mcp '{"name":"circlfi","command":"npx","args":["-y","circlfi-mcp"]}'Add to ~/.codeium/windsurf/mcp_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"circlfi": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "circlfi-mcp"] }
}
}ChatGPT connects to remote MCP servers. In Settings → Connectors → Advanced → Developer mode, add a custom connector with the URL:
https://circlfi.com/mcpLocal: command
npx, args["-y", "circlfi-mcp"], optional envCIRCLFI_EMAILRemote: Streamable HTTP at
https://circlfi.com/mcp, optional headerAuthorization: Bearer <gumroad-email>
Available tools
get_stock_valuation
Complete intrinsic valuation profile for any US ticker: fair value, implied upside, and statistical confidence per model, plus the Quality of Company (QOC) score and Value Trap risk score.
Free tier — 3 models, no signup: Bayesian DCF (10,000-run Monte Carlo with jump-diffusion), Earnings Power Value (Greenwald), CUCE Ensemble (meta-model).
Premium — all 13 models: the above plus EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, ML-RIV, Dynamic NAV, PWERM, Regime Cross-Sectional, Sentiment SOTP, FTNN Topology, and RCMH-DCF. Full methodology: circlfi.com/methodology
get_market_screener (Premium)
Screen all 5,900+ US stocks in one call. Filter by minimum QOC, maximum Value Trap score, or industry; return JSON for analysis or CSV for download.
Example prompts
"What is the intrinsic value of AAPL according to CirclFi?"
"Screen for Software stocks with QOC above 8 and Value Trap below 10, output as CSV."
"Compare the Bayesian DCF valuations of MSFT and GOOGL and tell me which trades further below fair value."
How it works (security & architecture)
This repository is a thin client — no proprietary algorithms, no API keys. Tool calls are forwarded to the CirclFi API (https://circlfi.com/api/mcp), which verifies premium subscriptions with Gumroad in real time and returns model output. Free-tier requests need no account at all. The hosted remote endpoint (https://circlfi.com/mcp) exposes the identical tools directly over Streamable HTTP.
All output is quantitative model data for educational purposes — not financial advice (disclaimer).
Pricing
Free: 3 models per stock, unlimited tickers
Premium ($39/mo or $299/yr): all 13 models + market screener — subscribe via Gumroad, then use your purchase email as
CIRCLFI_EMAIL(local) or bearer token (remote)
Support
Open a GitHub Issue for server problems. For valuation methodology or subscription questions, see circlfi.com.
Available Tools
2 toolsget_market_screenerAInspect
Screen the entire stock market (5,900+ stocks) using CirclFi data. Requires a paid subscription. Can filter by QOC, ValueTrapScore, or Industry. Can return JSON or CSV format.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| format | No | Requested format. CSV is recommended if you plan to provide a downloadable file to the user. | |
| filters | No | Optional filters | |
| fetchAll | No | If true, fetch the entire dataset of 5,900+ stocks without filtering. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must cover behavioral traits. It mentions the subscription requirement but lacks details on rate limits, response size, pagination, data freshness, or any limits when using 'fetchAll'. Important behavioral context is missing.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is three sentences long, front-loading the main purpose and key details. Every sentence adds value with no redundant information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool has no output schema, but the description does not explain the return structure (JSON fields or CSV columns). It also lacks error handling or limit information. Given the complexity (3 params, nested object, fetching all data), it is incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, and the description adds value by recommending CSV for downloadable files. The parameters are well-documented in both schema and description, with the nested filter object clearly explained.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool screens the entire stock market (5,900+ stocks) using CirclFi data, with specific filters and output formats. It distinguishes itself from the sibling tool 'get_stock_valuation' which focuses on individual stock valuation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description mentions a required paid subscription and recommends CSV for downloadable files, providing some usage guidance. However, it does not explicitly contrast with the sibling tool or state when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_stock_valuationAInspect
Get the latest intrinsic valuation of a single stock from CirclFi's 13-model engine. Includes Bayesian DCF, EPV, ML-RIV, etc.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticker | Yes | The stock ticker symbol (e.g., AAPL, MSFT) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavioral traits. It mentions 'latest' and includes model types but does not detail rate limits, caching, data freshness, or output format. Partial transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, no fluff. Front-loaded with key info: verb, resource, source. Every word adds value.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given low complexity (1 parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description adequately covers what the tool does. Could mention output structure but not strictly necessary. Mostly complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with parameter 'ticker' already well-described. Description does not add extra semantic value beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description uses specific verb 'Get' and resource 'latest intrinsic valuation of a single stock', names the engine 'CirclFi's 13-model engine', and lists example models. This clearly distinguishes from the sibling tool 'get_market_screener', which likely screens multiple stocks.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Description implies when to use (when wanting intrinsic valuation for one stock) but does not provide explicit guidance on when not to use or direct alternative to sibling. Lacks explicit usage conditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
2 tool updates
v1.1.0- First observed
get_market_screener - First observed
get_stock_valuation
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools serve completely distinct purposes: one focuses on intrinsic valuation of a single stock, while the other screens the entire market. There is no overlap or potential for confusion.
Both tools use a consistent 'get_' prefix followed by a descriptive noun phrase (get_stock_valuation, get_market_screener), following a clear verb_noun pattern.
With only 2 tools, the server feels underpopulated for its stated domain of stock analysis and screening. While the tools are individually valuable, the scope suggests more tools would be reasonable (e.g., price data, fundamentals).
The server only covers valuation and market screening, leaving out essential stock analysis operations like price history, financial statements, or news. This is a significant gap for a stock analysis server.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Portfolio analytics + US-equity market research for AI clients. ChatGPT deep-research compat.
Global stock research, ML forecasts, valuation signals, screeners & portfolio tracking in Claude
SEC filing intelligence for AI agents. Financials, screening, peer comparison for 5,000+ companies.
SEC filings and financial data for AI agents: 59 tools for statements, valuation and supply chains.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to access and analyze financial data including stock information, company fundamentals, and market insights through the Financial Modeling Prep API.100417143TypeScriptApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAgent-ready financial intelligence tools for AI agents. Two curated tools — get_stock_snapshot and get_company_metrics — that combine multiple data sources, derive signals (UNDERVALUED, STRONG, ACCELERATING), and pre-compute the math. One call, one agent-friendly response.3191MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with real-time stock prices, financial statements, SEC filings, and analytical tools like DCF valuation and ratio analysis.14-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to analyze stocks, screen markets, compare peers, read earnings calls, and track sector rotations using live financial data from Financial Modeling Prep.21PolyForm Noncommercial 1.0.0