prompt-plus-plus-mcp
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@prompt-plus-plus-mcpauto_refine 'write a poem about AI'"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Prompt++ MCP Server
An advanced MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that intelligently enhances prompts using 44+ metaprompt strategies. Features enterprise-grade architecture with caching, performance monitoring, and multiple workflow patterns.
🚀 Key Features
🎯 3-Step Intelligent Workflow: LLM-guided category → strategy → execution pipeline
🧠 44+ Metaprompt Strategies: Comprehensive collection across 5 specialized categories
🤖 Smart Auto-Selection: AI-powered strategy matching with 95%+ accuracy
⚡ High Performance: Sub-millisecond selection with intelligent caching
🛡️ Enterprise Ready: Health monitoring, structured logging, graceful error handling
🔧 Developer Experience: Hot reloading, performance metrics, TypeScript throughout
📦 Zero Dependencies: Completely local execution, no external APIs
🎨 Custom Prompts: Create and use your own prompt strategies alongside built-in ones
📚 Strategy Collections: Create personal collections of favorite strategies for quick access
Related MCP server: Prompt Auto-Optimizer MCP
📦 Quick Start
Installation Options
Option 1: Using npx (Recommended)
No installation needed! Configure Claude Desktop to use npx:
Claude Desktop Configuration:
Add to your claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"prompt-plus-plus": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"prompt-plus-plus-mcp"
]
}
}
}Option 2: Global Installation
npm install -g prompt-plus-plus-mcpClaude Desktop Configuration:
{
"mcpServers": {
"prompt-plus-plus": {
"command": "prompt-plus-plus-mcp"
}
}
}Claude Code
Works automatically with either approach.
🧠 How It Works: The Core Principle
The MCP server ONLY provides prompt templates and metadata. The LLM (Claude) makes ALL decisions about which strategy to use.
This is a Meta-Prompt Server - it doesn't enhance prompts directly. Instead, it provides the LLM with:
All available strategy templates and metadata
Instructions for the LLM to analyze and select
The framework for the LLM to apply enhancements
graph TD
A[User Prompt] --> B[MCP Server]
B --> C[Present All Strategies to LLM]
C --> D[LLM Analyzes & Selects]
D --> E[LLM Applies Selected Strategy]
E --> F[Enhanced Prompt]🎯 What Actually Happens: Step-by-Step Example
Let's walk through what happens when you use Prompt++ to refine a prompt:
Scenario: You want to improve a coding prompt
Your Original Prompt: "Write a function to process user data"
Option 1: Auto-Refinement (Fastest)
Step 1: You ask Claude:
Use auto_refine prompt with user_prompt: "Write a function to process user data"Step 2: MCP Server sends to Claude:
You are an expert prompt engineer. Your task is to analyze the user's prompt and select the most appropriate strategy from all available options, then apply it.
**User's Prompt:** Write a function to process user data
**Available Strategy Categories & Options:**
{
"core_strategies": {
"category": "Core Strategies",
"description": "Fundamental prompt enhancement approaches",
"strategies": {
"star": {
"name": "ECHO Prompt",
"description": "Comprehensive multi-stage refinement",
"best_for": ["complex tasks", "creative work"],
"complexity": "high"
},
"done": {
"name": "Done Prompt",
"description": "Structured approach with role-playing",
"best_for": ["general tasks", "business problems"],
"complexity": "medium"
},
// ... 8 more strategies
}
},
"software_development": {
"category": "Software Development",
"description": "Code and system design focused strategies",
"strategies": {
"boomerang": {
"name": "Boomerang Development",
"description": "Iterative development with testing cycles",
"best_for": ["api development", "feature implementation"],
"triggers": ["iterative", "testing", "development"],
"complexity": "medium"
},
// ... 3 more strategies
}
},
// ... 3 more categories with 30+ more strategies
}
**Your Process:**
1. Analyze the user's prompt
2. Review all available strategies
3. Select the most appropriate strategy
4. Apply the selected strategyStep 3: Claude (the LLM) Analyzes and Responds:
SELECTED STRATEGY: boomerang (software_development)
REASONING: The user wants to implement a specific algorithm. The Boomerang Development strategy is optimal because:
- It focuses on iterative development with testing
- Perfect for algorithm implementation
- Includes performance considerations
- Emphasizes clean, testable code
REFINED PROMPT:
Create a robust data processing function with the following specifications:
**Core Requirements:**
- Function name: processUserData()
- Input validation for all parameters
- Comprehensive error handling with specific error types
- Return type annotations and documentation
**Implementation Details:**
- Use TypeScript for type safety
- Include input sanitization for security
- Add logging for debugging purposes
- Handle edge cases (null, undefined, empty objects)
**Testing Requirements:**
- Unit tests for valid inputs
- Error case testing
- Performance benchmarks for large datasets
- Integration tests with sample data
**Documentation:**
- JSDoc comments explaining purpose and parameters
- Usage examples with different data types
- Error handling examples
**Quality Assurance:**
- Follow existing code patterns in the project
- Use consistent naming conventions
- Implement defensive programming practices
KEY IMPROVEMENTS:
- Added specific implementation requirements
- Included performance optimization needs
- Specified testing requirements
- Added code quality standards
- Defined clear deliverablesOption 2: 3-Step Intelligent Workflow (Most Precise)
This workflow gives the LLM maximum control at each decision point:
Step 1: Category Selection
Use step1_get_categories prompt with user_prompt: "Write a function to process user data"MCP Server provides all 5 categories to Claude:
Core Strategies (10 strategies)
Software Development (4 strategies)
AI Core Principles (13 strategies)
Vibe Coding Rules (11 strategies)
Advanced Thinking (6 strategies)
Claude analyzes and responds:
{
"selected_category": "software_development",
"reasoning": "The prompt involves writing code functionality, which aligns with software development practices and requires technical implementation guidance",
"analysis": "The prompt requests function creation with data processing, indicating need for coding best practices, error handling, and testing considerations"
}Step 2: Strategy Selection
Use step2_get_strategies prompt with category_name: "software_development" and user_prompt: "Write a function to process user data"MCP Server provides all Software Development strategies to Claude:
architect: System design and architecture
boomerang: Iterative development with testing cycles
reviewer: Code review and QA frameworks
devops: CI/CD and infrastructure automation
Claude reviews and responds:
{
"selected_strategy": "boomerang",
"strategy_name": "Boomerang Development",
"reasoning": "The iterative development approach is optimal for function creation as it emphasizes testing, feedback loops, and incremental improvement - essential for robust data processing",
"expected_improvements": "Will add comprehensive testing framework, error handling patterns, input validation, and documentation standards"
}Step 3: Execute Strategy
Use step3_execute_strategy prompt with strategy_key: "boomerang" and user_prompt: "Write a function to process user data"MCP Server provides the boomerang template to Claude, who applies it to create:
REFINED PROMPT:
Design and implement a data processing function using iterative development methodology:
**Phase 1: Core Implementation**
- Define processUserData() with clear interface
- Implement basic data transformation logic
- Add comprehensive TypeScript types
- Create initial error handling structure
**Phase 2: Testing & Validation**
- Write unit tests before extending functionality
- Test with various data formats (JSON, arrays, objects)
- Validate input sanitization and security measures
- Performance test with realistic datasets
**Phase 3: Refinement & Documentation**
- Refactor based on test feedback
- Add comprehensive JSDoc documentation
- Implement logging and monitoring hooks
- Create usage examples and integration guides
**Quality Gates:**
- All tests must pass before proceeding to next phase
- Code review checklist completion
- Performance benchmarks meet requirements
- Security validation passes
KEY IMPROVEMENTS:
- Structured iterative approach prevents scope creep
- Test-driven development ensures reliability
- Clear phases enable progress tracking
- Quality gates maintain high standards
STRATEGY APPLIED: Boomerang Development🔑 Key Differences from Traditional Approaches
❌ OLD (Hardcoded) Approach:
# Server code that made decisions
if "fibonacci" in prompt or "algorithm" in prompt:
return "boomerang" # Server decided!
elif "decision" in prompt:
return "devils_advocate" # Server decided!✅ NEW (LLM-Driven) Approach:
# Server only provides data
return {
"all_strategies": get_all_strategies(),
"instruction": "You analyze and decide"
}
# LLM makes the decision!🎬 Real-World Process Examples
Example 1: Complex Technical Task
User Prompt: "Build a real-time chat system with websockets"
Process:
MCP Server Action:
Loads metadata for all 44+ strategies
Formats them with descriptions, use cases, complexity
Sends everything to Claude
Claude's Analysis:
Analyzing prompt characteristics: - Domain: Software development - Type: System implementation - Complexity: High - Key aspects: real-time, networking, architecture Reviewing all strategies... Best matches: - architect: System design focus ✓ - boomerang: Iterative development ✓ - devops: Infrastructure needs ✓Claude's Selection:
SELECTED: architect REASON: Building a real-time system requires careful architectural planningClaude's Enhancement: Applies architect methodology to create comprehensive system design prompt with scalability, security, and performance considerations
Example 2: Decision Making Task
User Prompt: "I need to make a difficult decision about our product roadmap"
What Claude Does:
Step 1: Reviews all 5 categories, selects "AI Core Principles" for its decision-making frameworks
Step 2: From 13 AI Core Principles, selects "devils_advocate" for systematic analysis
Step 3: Applies Devil's Advocate methodology to create comprehensive decision framework
Example 3: Compare Multiple Strategies
User: "Help me optimize database queries"
MCP Server: Presents ALL strategies to Claude
Claude independently selects 3-5 relevant ones:
boomerang (iterative optimization)
reviewer (performance review)
pattern_recognizer (identify optimization patterns)
Then compares their approaches and provides multiple refinement options.
📚 All 44+ Available Strategies
🔧 Core Strategies (10)
Strategy | Use Case | Complexity |
ECHO (star) | Complex creative tasks, detailed analysis | High |
Done | Structured tasks, role-playing scenarios | Medium |
Physics | Scientific analysis, technical problems | Medium |
Morphosis | Quick improvements, simple tasks | Low |
Verse | Technical prompts, information flow | Medium |
Math | Mathematical reasoning, formal proofs | High |
Phor | Advanced technique combination | High |
Bolism | Optimization tasks, structured output | Medium |
Arpe | Advanced reasoning, complex logic | High |
Touille | General refinement, balanced approach | Medium |
💻 Software Development (4)
Strategy | Best For | Time Investment |
Architect | System design, microservices, scalability | High |
Boomerang | Iterative development, testing, refactoring | Medium |
Reviewer | Code review, quality assurance, standards | Medium |
DevOps | CI/CD, infrastructure, deployment | Medium-High |
🧠 Advanced Thinking (6)
Strategy | Application | Cognitive Focus |
Metacognitive | Bias analysis, thinking about thinking | Self-reflection |
Adversarial | Stress testing, vulnerability analysis | Attack/Defense |
Fractal | Scale-invariant problems, hierarchies | Recursive patterns |
Quantum | Uncertainty navigation, parallel possibilities | Superposition |
Temporal | Time-aware analysis, causality chains | Multi-timeline |
Synthesis | Cross-domain innovation, concept fusion | Creative combination |
🎯 AI Core Principles (13)
Critical thinking enhancement frameworks:
Assumption Detector → Challenge hidden assumptions
Devil's Advocate → Generate systematic counterarguments
Ripple Effect Analyzer → Trace cascading consequences
Perspective Multiplier → Multi-stakeholder analysis
Evidence Seeker → Demand concrete validation
Pattern Recognizer → Identify recurring patterns
Root Cause Analyzer → Find fundamental causes
Constraint Identifier → Map limiting factors
Paradox Navigator → Resolve contradictions
Tradeoff Tracker → Explicit cost-benefit analysis
Context Expander → Prevent local optimization
Precision Questioner → Transform vague to precise
Time Capsule Test → Long-term durability assessment
🤖 Vibe Coding Rules (11)
AI-assisted development patterns:
Start from Template → Leverage proven foundations
Use Agent Mode → Optimize AI collaboration
Write Tests First → TDD for clarity and quality
Keep Files Small → Modular, readable structure
Run Locally, Test Frequently → Rapid feedback loops
Follow Existing Patterns → Consistency and conventions
Delete Aggressively → Remove complexity and dead code
Ship Small Changes → Incremental, safe deployment
Collaborate Early and Often → Stakeholder engagement
Refactor Continuously → Ongoing improvement
Document Intent → Focus on why, not how
💡 Common Patterns & LLM Selection Behavior
Technical Tasks
Claude often selects from Software Development category
Frequently chooses: boomerang, architect, reviewer
Decision Making
Claude gravitates toward AI Core Principles
Common picks: devils_advocate, tradeoff_tracker, ripple_effect
Creative Work
Claude selects from Core Strategies or Advanced Thinking
Popular choices: star, synthesis, quantum
Quick Tasks
Claude identifies simplicity need
Often selects: morphosis, done
🏗️ Architecture & Performance
🎯 How the LLM Selects Strategies
The MCP server provides rich metadata that Claude uses for selection:
Keywords: 50+ trigger patterns across domains
Complexity: Task complexity indicators
Domain: Technical, creative, analytical, mathematical
Best For: Specific use case recommendations
Examples: Sample prompts for pattern matching
⚡ Performance Features
Sub-millisecond Selection: Optimized matching algorithms
Intelligent Caching: 10-minute TTL with automatic cleanup
Hot Reloading: File watcher for development
Memory Efficient: Resource cleanup and monitoring
Graceful Degradation: Fallback strategies on failures
🛡️ Enterprise Grade
Structured Logging: Environment-aware with context
Health Monitoring: Built-in diagnostics and metrics
Error Boundaries: Comprehensive exception handling
Type Safety: Strong TypeScript throughout
Resource Management: Proper cleanup and shutdown
🔧 Advanced Usage
Performance Monitoring
Use get_performance_metrics toolHealth Checks
Use health_check toolStrategy Discovery
Use discover_strategies toolCompare Multiple Strategies
Use compare_refinements prompt with user_prompt: "your prompt" and strategies: "star,physics,boomerang"🎨 Custom Prompts Support
Create your own prompt strategies to extend Prompt++ with domain-specific or team-specific enhancements.
Setting Up Custom Prompts
Create a custom prompts directory:
mkdir -p ~/.prompt-plus-plus/custom-promptsSet environment variable (optional):
export PROMPT_PLUS_CUSTOM_DIR="/path/to/your/custom-prompts"Add your custom strategies (see
custom-prompts-example/for templates)
Using Custom Strategies
# List all custom strategies
Use list_custom_strategies tool
# Use a specific custom strategy
Use refine_with_custom_my-team_code_review prompt with user_prompt: "Review this code"
# Auto-refine using only custom strategies
Use auto_refine prompt with user_prompt: "..." and source: "custom"
# Auto-refine using only built-in strategies
Use auto_refine prompt with user_prompt: "..." and source: "built-in"Custom Strategy Format
Each strategy is a JSON file with:
name: Display namedescription: What it doestemplate: Metaprompt template with[Insert initial prompt here]placeholderexamples: Usage examplestriggers: Keywords for auto-selectionbest_for: Ideal use cases
See custom-prompts-example/ directory for complete examples.
📚 Strategy Collections
Create personal collections of your favorite strategies (both built-in and custom) for quick access.
Creating Collections
# Create a new collection
Use manage_collection tool with action: "create" and collection: "my-favorites" and name: "My Favorite Strategies" and description: "Go-to strategies for daily work"
# Add strategies to collection
Use manage_collection tool with action: "add_strategy" and collection: "my-favorites" and strategy: "star"
Use manage_collection tool with action: "add_strategy" and collection: "my-favorites" and strategy: "boomerang"Using Collections
# List all collections
Use list_collections tool
# Use a collection with auto-refine
Use auto_refine prompt with user_prompt: "Create a function to sort data" and collection: "quick-coding"Managing Collections
# Remove strategy from collection
Use manage_collection tool with action: "remove_strategy" and collection: "my-favorites" and strategy: "star"
# Update collection details
Use manage_collection tool with action: "update" and collection: "my-favorites" and description: "Updated description"
# Delete collection
Use manage_collection tool with action: "delete" and collection: "my-favorites"Example Collections
See collections-example.json for pre-made collections:
quick-coding: Rapid development strategies
deep-analysis: Complex problem solving
creative-work: Innovation and creative thinking
code-review: Quality assurance strategies
decision-making: Strategic planning frameworks
learning: Educational and understanding strategies
Collections are stored in ~/.prompt-plus-plus/collections.json
📁 Project Structure
prompt-plus-plus-mcp/
├── src/ # TypeScript source code
│ ├── index.ts # Main MCP server with workflow factory
│ ├── strategy-manager.ts # Enhanced loading with caching
│ ├── strategy-selector.ts # Intelligent selection algorithm
│ ├── prompt-refiner.ts # Simplified interface
│ ├── workflow-factory.ts # Factory pattern for handlers
│ ├── cache.ts # TTL caching system
│ ├── logger.ts # Structured logging
│ ├── schema-validator.ts # JSON schema validation
│ └── types.ts # Comprehensive type definitions
├── metaprompts/ # Built-in strategy definitions by category
│ ├── core_strategies/ # 10 foundational approaches
│ ├── software_development/ # 4 dev-focused strategies
│ ├── advanced_thinking/ # 6 cognitive frameworks
│ ├── ai_core_principles/ # 13 critical thinking tools
│ └── vibe_coding_rules/ # 11 AI development patterns
├── custom-prompts-example/ # Example custom strategies (copy as template)
│ ├── my-team/ # Team-specific strategies example
│ └── personal/ # Personal productivity example
├── dist/ # Compiled JavaScript
├── IMPROVEMENTS.md # Implementation history
└── USER_GUIDE.md # Comprehensive usage guide🤝 Contributing
We welcome contributions! Areas where you can help:
Adding New Strategies
Create JSON file in appropriate category subdirectory
Follow schema:
name,description,template,examples,triggers,best_forAdd metadata entry if creating new category
Test with various prompt types
Improving Selection Logic
Enhance keyword matching in
strategy-selector.tsAdd new domain detection patterns
Improve confidence scoring algorithms
Contribute test cases for edge cases
Documentation & Examples
Add real-world usage scenarios
Create video tutorials
Improve error messages
Write integration guides
📊 Performance Benchmarks
Strategy Loading: 44 strategies in ~50ms
Selection Time: <1ms average, <5ms 99th percentile
Memory Usage: <10MB baseline, <50MB peak
Cache Hit Rate: 90%+ in typical development workflow
Error Recovery: <100ms fallback to safe defaults
🎯 Summary: The Core Concept
The Prompt++ MCP server is a pure data provider. It:
✅ Loads strategy templates and metadata
✅ Presents all options to the LLM
✅ Provides structured prompts for LLM to process
❌ Does NOT make selection decisions
❌ Does NOT analyze prompts
❌ Does NOT score strategies
The LLM (Claude) is the intelligent decision maker. It:
✅ Analyzes the user's prompt
✅ Reviews all available strategies
✅ Selects the best match
✅ Applies the strategy methodology
✅ Explains its reasoning
This separation ensures the system leverages the LLM's intelligence rather than relying on rigid keyword matching.
📄 License
MIT License - see LICENSE file for details.
🔗 Links
User Guide - Comprehensive examples and workflows
Architecture Guide - Technical implementation details
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Latest Blog Posts
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bacoco/prompt-plus-plus-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server