Skip to main content
Glama

Model Registry

gitlab_model_registry
Read-onlyIdempotent

Pull model artifacts (e.g., .pkl, .onnx, .safetensors) from the GitLab Model Registry for inference or evaluation in build pipelines.

Instructions

Use {"action":"download","params":{...}}; only top-level keys are action and params. Action params schema: gitlab://schema/meta/gitlab_model_registry/.

Download ML model package files from the GitLab Model Registry. Read-only — cannot publish or delete model versions through this tool. The underlying GitLab API requires a Premium/Ultimate plan on the target instance (server enforces it with 403); the tool itself is always registered and is not gated by GITLAB_ENTERPRISE. When to use: pull a model artifact (.pkl, .onnx, .safetensors, .bin, .gguf, etc.) attached to a registered model version, e.g. for inference, evaluation or vendoring into a build pipeline. NOT for: generic packages (use gitlab_package), container images (use gitlab_package registry_), release attachments (use gitlab_release link_), training jobs or experiment tracking, model publishing or versioning (not yet exposed through MCP).

Returns:

  • download: {file_name, model_version_id, size, content_base64} — binary content is base64-encoded; large models can produce very large responses. Errors: 404 (hint: project_id, model_version_id and path are model-registry-scoped; verify in the GitLab UI under Deploy → Model registry), 403 (hint: requires Reporter+ on the project and a Premium/Ultimate plan), 400 (hint: filename must match an asset attached to the version).

  • download: project_id*, model_version_id*, path*, filename*. Returns base64-encoded file content.

    • project_id (string | int, required) — numeric ID or URL-encoded full path of the project that owns the registered model.

    • model_version_id (int, required) — registered model version ID; visible in the GitLab UI under Deploy → Model registry → → Versions.

    • path (string, required) — package-relative directory of the asset (use '/' for the package root, otherwise e.g. 'artifacts/' or 'weights/').

    • filename (string, required) — exact asset filename within the package, including extension (e.g. 'model.safetensors', 'config.json').

    • Any unrecognized parameter name is rejected by the meta-tool router (strict unknown-field validation); only the reserved meta key 'confirm' is stripped before unmarshalling.

See also: gitlab_package (generic / npm / maven / conan / pypi / nuget / container packages), gitlab_release (asset links per release), gitlab_repository (raw files in the repo).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
actionYesAction to perform. Pick exactly one of the values in `enum`. Each action expects its own `params` object — see the tool description for the per-action parameter list.
paramsNoAction-specific parameters as a JSON object. Required and optional fields differ per action. This envelope schema stays broad; runtime validation applies the chosen action's schema after reserved meta keys like `confirm` are stripped. For the JSON Schema of a specific action's `params`, read the MCP resource `gitlab://schema/meta/{tool}/{action}` (replace placeholders with the tool name and the chosen action).

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
next_stepsNoOptional. Suggested follow-up actions or tool calls for the LLM, contextual to the result.
paginationNoPresent on list actions. Use `has_more` and `next_page` to paginate through results.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, but the description adds valuable behavioral context: 'Read-only — cannot publish or delete model versions through this tool,' it discloses API plan requirements (Premium/Ultimate), and warns about large responses. No contradictions with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is long but well-structured with clear sections (usage, not-for, returns, errors, download params, see also). It is front-loaded with the action structure. Could be slightly more concise, but the organization helps readability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (nested action/params, output schema exists, many siblings), the description is comprehensive. It covers when to use, parameters, errors, and alternatives, and the output schema provides the rest. No gaps for effective agent use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although schema coverage is 100%, the description adds extensive meaning beyond the schema by detailing each parameter for the download action (project_id, model_version_id, path, filename) with types, descriptions, and hints. It also explains error cases and strict validation, which is highly informative.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Download ML model package files from the GitLab Model Registry.' It uses specific verbs and resource scope, and explicitly distinguishes from sibling tools by listing what it is not for (e.g., 'NOT for: generic packages (use gitlab_package)...').

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit when-to-use guidance ('pull a model artifact... for inference, evaluation or vendoring') and when-not-to-use with named alternatives ('generic packages (use gitlab_package), container images (use gitlab_package registry_*), release attachments (use gitlab_release link_*)'). This is comprehensive and clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jmrplens/gitlab-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server