remove_wireless_interface

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true, but the description itself adds no additional behavioral context, such as the permanent nature of removal or any side effects. It does not contradict the annotations, but it also does not enhance the agent's understanding beyond what structured metadata already provides.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence: "Removes a wireless interface from the MikroTik device." It is front-loaded, free of fluff, and every word contributes to its purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's low complexity, the description is too terse. It omits parameter semantics and does not clarify the impact of removal beyond the annotation's destructive hint, even though an output schema exists. The device parameter is particularly under-explained, making it incomplete for safe invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the meaning of the 'name' or 'device' parameters. With two parameters and no param-level descriptions, the description fails to compensate, leaving the agent without crucial information about what identifies the wireless interface.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: "Removes a wireless interface from the MikroTik device." It uses a specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like enable/disable or create/update wireless interfaces.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as disabling an interface instead of removing it, or any prerequisites. The description simply states what it does without context for decision-making.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.