remove_dhcp_server

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true, and the description's 'Removes' is consistent with these. The description adds only a minor detail about the device scope, but does not disclose additional behavioral aspects such as side effects on dependent configurations or whether deletion is reversible.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that is front-loaded with the verb and resource. It contains no redundant information and is appropriately sized for the tool's complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple and the description plus annotations provide the core information. However, the description does not explain parameter semantics or any prerequisites (e.g., whether the server must exist). An output schema exists, so return values are covered separately. Overall, adequate but with clear gaps in parameter guidance.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It does not explain the 'name' parameter (the identifier of the DHCP server) or the optional 'device' parameter. The parameter names and titles are minimally self-explanatory, but the description adds no semantic value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Removes' with the clear resource 'DHCP server' and scopes it to 'the MikroTik device'. It clearly distinguishes from sibling tools like create_dhcp_server, list_dhcp_servers, and get_dhcp_server.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage: use this tool when you want to delete an existing DHCP server. However, it provides no explicit guidance about when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., disabling a server) or any prerequisites/exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.