disable_simple_queue

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds no behavioral details beyond the action itself. Annotations already indicate idempotentHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered, but the description does not introduce any additional context such as side effects, state changes, or operational constraints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that is front-loaded with the essential action. There is no clutter or redundant elaboration, making it efficiently scannable by the agent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having annotations and an output schema, the description is too minimal to be contextually complete. It does not explain the operational context (e.g., what 'disabled' means for a queue), when the operation is appropriate, or how the parameters relate to the action, leaving gaps that could cause misuse.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not compensate by explaining the purpose, format, or relationship of the 'name' and 'device' parameters. The agent receives no semantic guidance beyond the raw parameter names, which is insufficient for reliable invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Disables a simple queue' clearly names the specific action (disable) and the resource (simple queue), distinguishing it from sibling tools like enable_simple_queue and remove_simple_queue. It is a precise, resource-specific statement.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as enable_simple_queue or remove_simple_queue. No context, prerequisites, or exclusion conditions are provided, leaving the agent without direction on appropriate use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.