Spine
Allows fetching requirements from Confluence pages to drive autonomous code generation.
Allows reading requirements from Markdown files as input for the development pipeline.
Allows fetching requirements from Notion pages to drive autonomous code generation.
Allows running local language models via Ollama for code generation and comprehension.
Allows using OpenAI models for code generation and understanding throughout the pipeline.
Provides distributed tracing and observability for all LLM calls and pipeline steps.
Provides durable workflow orchestration and checkpointing for long-running autonomous pipelines.
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Spinestart a feature from the spec at ./spec.md with human approval gates"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Spine
Turn requirements into reviewed, tested pull requests, with a human in control.
Spine reads requirements from Confluence, Notion, Markdown or OpenSpec, builds a deterministic graph of your target repo, and generates code grounded in its existing structure and conventions. You can inspect the graph and a build plan before spending model tokens, build locally, then choose when to push a pull request for human review.
The product is Spine, its package is synaptixs-spine, and its command is
orchestrator. Comprehension supports ten front-ends: Python, Java, TypeScript,
C#, C, C++, Go, PHP, Perl and SQL, with the matching parser extras installed.
uv tool install synaptixs-spineSETUP.md owns prerequisites,
extras, credentials and troubleshooting. The base install is enough for the
Python worked example; add [sdlc] for builds or [all] for the agent plugin and
all language parsers.
Start here
Run the worked example. Follow one real ticket in a public codebase, with reproducible output. Its comprehension steps need no credentials; the model-dependent build is marked.
Build a feature locally. Configure a model, inspect the plan, and use
--safefor a local branch and diff.Go live after review. Use
--liveto open a PR, then close the tracker loop after a human merges it.
To look at your own repo first, run orchestrator state /path/to/repo. It writes
nothing unless you request an output file. orchestrator understand builds the
reviewable episteme/ knowledge base; it is the comprehension command that writes.
The optional [clang] extra adds C/C++ member-call edges between existing
symbols. Installing it enables the pass automatically, including through [all].
For extraction without clang, use a fresh environment with [languages] or
[c,cpp]. Installation details and limits are in
SETUP.md.
Related MCP server: MCP SDD Server
What is measured
The graph comes from parsers, with file:line provenance. CI scores its precision
and recall against a hand-labelled corpus, and checks for regressions. Those
fixture scores are bounds on the tested cases, not a promise that arbitrary code
has no missing or incorrect edge.
On the corpus, TypeScript CALLS recall is 0.86; CI re-derives this figure
from the committed scoreboard.
On a pinned five-project bug corpus, the fixing file appears in the top ten for 27 of 38 tickets; the first guess is right for 12. The method, confidence intervals, graph accuracy and limits are in BENCHMARK.md.
Controlled codegen runs measure whether grounding improves integration, including an arm without the graph and tickets that already name their target file. Read the internal results and external replication for the models, commands, counts and limits.
C/C++ semantic recovery and runtime vary widely by repository. Repository-local include roots can improve resolution, while missing standard/generated headers and unsupported identities still limit it. Recovered pending-site fractions are not whole-repository recall. OpenCV's measured median extraction takes 300.296 s with clang versus 29.501 s without it; this suits batch work only when that cost is acceptable. Some measured profiles gain no useful relationships. See the support contract and five-repository evaluation.
What's new
3.35.0 (current) — two additive features. An optional C/C++ semantic pass
(pip install 'synaptixs-spine[clang]') resolves member calls the CST cannot, adding edges
only between symbols already in the graph — ids, nodes and determinism unchanged; the
standard library stays out of reach. And pkg export --format cypher loads the graph into
Neo4j, Memgraph or any openCypher store for the traversal questions the flat projections
cannot answer — transitive closure, cycles, shortest path.
3.34.2 — maintainer tooling: a generic plan skeleton every development plan starts from, and a roadmap-currency gate that can check a plan kept outside the checkout. No engine changes.
3.34.1 — documentation has one home per task: AGENT_GUIDE.md replaces the two host guides (its MCP tool inventory is generated and gated), SETUP.md owns installation and credentials, USER_GUIDE.md the everyday build, and OPERATIONS.md the pipeline and dashboard walkthrough. No engine changes — the wheel is identical to 3.34.0.
3.34.0 — Perl ships comprehension and codegen: packages, inheritance,
calls, Mojolicious/Dancer2 routes and DBIx::Class entities; builds use perl -c,
configured Perl::Critic, then prove, with optional cpanm. A single toolchain
registry now owns language dispatch, protected by 8 of 8 caught mutations.
Greenfield and brownfield validation is recorded in the
Perl roadmap.
Full release history: CHANGELOG.
Capabilities
✅ shipped · 🟡 partial or operator-gated · 🔬 experimental, off by default.
Commands below use the orchestrator prefix. All flags and detailed behavior are
in CLI_REFERENCE.md.
Capability | Status | Command or reference |
Requirements → specs → tracked backlog; OpenSpec intake and write-back drafts | ✅ |
|
Reviewable build document; digest-bound human approval before code | ✅ |
|
Research evidence, code-bound acceptance criteria, validated design references | ✅ |
|
Local feature build, live PR, review feedback, post-merge tracker completion | ✅ |
|
Durable multi-feature pipeline and approval dashboard | ✅ |
|
Inspect the execution graph, node results and selected workflow | ✅ |
|
Python, Java, TypeScript, C#, C, C++, Go, PHP and Perl comprehension/codegen | ✅ |
|
Optional C/C++ member-call enrichment between grounded symbols; measured coverage limits | 🟡 |
|
SQL schema/query/procedure comprehension, migration folding, UTF-16 and SQL Server | ✅ |
|
SQL migration codegen validated in SQLite or opt-in Docker Postgres | ✅ |
|
Framework endpoints and data-layer edges, including JAX-RS, ASP.NET Core and EF Core | ✅ | |
C/C++ include graphs, C++ routing for included | ✅ |
|
Go packages, calls and interface satisfaction; multi-module build/test selection | ✅ |
|
PHP namespaces/traits/calls, Laravel/Slim/Symfony routes, Eloquent/Doctrine entities; Composer/PHAR PHPUnit | ✅ | |
Perl packages/inheritance/fields/calls, routes and data layer; syntax checks and | ✅ | |
Multi-repo graph across HTTP calls, shared tables and library imports; evidence-derived joins | ✅ |
|
Markdown, reST, text and HTML docs bound to code; PDF and Word/Excel with extras | ✅ |
|
OCR diagrams and transcribe audio/video into reviewed | ✅ opt-in |
|
Document-grounded codegen and committed | ✅ |
|
State report: infrastructure, structure, architecture, coverage and doc drift | ✅ |
|
Graph extraction/export, repo profile and model-assisted audit | ✅ |
|
Measured graph accuracy, regression gate and language-specific caveats in build plans | ✅ |
|
Per-file route/table parity and invented-call detection | 🟡 oracle-dependent |
|
Runtime call recall by executing the repository's tests | 🟡 Python only |
|
Ticket provenance from blame: | ✅ opt-in |
|
Human gates, policy, spend budgets, append-only audit, run export/replay | ✅ | Operations; registry trace/export |
RBAC and multi-tenancy | 🟡 partial |
|
Profile-based capability catalog, convention learning and clarifying questions | ✅ |
|
Agentic tool-use codegen with approved external tools | 🔬 |
|
Local/offline or mixed-provider models, selected per stage | ✅ |
|
PR reviewer/auditor personas, eval harness and cross-run semantic memory | ✅ | Persona registry, |
Live OpenTelemetry tracing joined to the audit log | ✅ opt-in |
|
Consume external MCP tools and database schema | ✅ |
|
Expose Spine tools, prompts and resources to Claude Code, Codex or other MCP hosts | ✅ | Agent guide; stdio or authenticated HTTP |
Domain-grounded build through ontomesh (semantic-spine seam 1) | ✅ opt-in |
|
Drift remediation and shipped-unit registration (seams 3 and 2) | 🟡 operator-gated |
|
Documentation
Question | Guide |
What does a real run look like? | |
How do I install, configure or troubleshoot? | |
How do I build and deliver a feature? | |
How do I use Spine from an assistant? | |
How do I run the pipeline and connect tools? | |
What does each command and flag do? | |
How is the graph built and persisted? | |
How do the platform layers fit together? | |
What is measured, and what are the limits? | |
What can I share with others? |
FAQ
Does it merge code on its own? No. It opens a PR; a human reviews and merges. There are two approval gates — before building and before merging — and safe mode makes no external writes at all.
Where does my code/data go?
To whichever LLM provider you configure — or nowhere external, if you run a local
model (Ollama). Generated code stays in a local branch until you choose --live.
Do I need Docker or a database?
Not for the everyday path (sdlc feature --safe builds one requirement locally).
The autonomous multi-feature pipeline + web dashboard needs Temporal + Postgres —
see the Setup guide.
Which languages and models?
Comprehension and codegen cover Python, Java, TypeScript, C#, C, C++, Go, PHP and Perl — each
front-end going beyond structure into what that stack actually does (Java and C# REST
endpoints, EF Core entities, C's #include graph, C++ templates and namespaces, Go
interface satisfaction by method-set matching). PHP adds a call graph too (namespaces,
classes, interfaces, traits, CALLS), plus Composer/PHAR PHPUnit codegen with changed-file lint.
Perl adds a call graph too (packages, inheritance across its five spellings,
$self/SUPER::/qualified/bare CALLS) — codegen uses perl -c then prove,
with optional cpanm for dependencies. SQL adds data-layer comprehension plus
greenfield migration codegen validated against an ephemeral database. Docs fold in
automatically; media (diagrams, screenshots, recorded reviews) via the opt-in
media extract. Any LiteLLM provider — Anthropic, OpenAI, Bedrock — or a local Ollama
model, and you can set a different model per stage. Extras and details:
SETUP.md.
How is it safe to run on real repos? Write guards on generated files, allow-listed + write-gated external tools, a per-run spend budget, an append-only audit trail, and human approval before any push or merge.
CLI or web UI? Either — they drive the same engine and the same API. Use the CLI for scripting/CI, the web UI for watching runs and approving gates by hand — or ask your assistant, which has the same operator tools over MCP.
Can other tools call it? Yes. It speaks MCP both ways: it can use external MCP servers, and it can run as an MCP server so Claude Code / Codex / your IDE can call the pipeline (with the same gates).
Security and contributing
Spine clones repositories and executes generated code. CI runs code and dependency security checks; report vulnerabilities through SECURITY.md.
Work from develop, add a failing fixture for changed behavior, and run the gate
in CONTRIBUTING.md.
Useful starting points are language front-ends (pkg/*_extractor.py), accuracy
fixtures (corpus/), and the tracked gaps in
STATE-OF-SPINE.
Measure what changed and state what was not checked.
License
MIT License. See LICENSE.
This server cannot be deployed
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Control plane for autonomous software labor. Agents claim objectives over MCP with audit trail.
AI-native git hosting — repos, PRs, issues, CI gates, and AI code review over MCP (60 tools).
MCP server for secureFlows: token-free URL builders and integration-linting tools for AI agents.
MCP server for AI agents to plan, verify, and deploy Cloudflare-native apps.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that equips AI agents with dev workflow tools including GitHub project management, conventional commits, visual regression testing, Jira/Confluence integration, and a persistent memory knowledge graph.5 npmMIT
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server implementing Spec-Driven Development workflows for AI-agent CLIs and IDEs like Claude Code and Cursor, enabling spec-first development with automated workflow guidance and quality checks.1612 npm52MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for AI DevTool workflow, exposing tools and resources for code review, repository chat, and repository operations.1-
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceA policy-aware MCP server for GitHub and GitHub Actions that enables safe AI-assisted infrastructure workflows—inspecting repositories, preparing branches and pull requests, and constrained remote mutations behind explicit preview-bound approval tokens.18MIT