ideogram-mcp
ideogram-mcp is an MCP server that lets you generate, edit, remix, reframe, background-replace, upscale, and describe images through Ideogram's v1 API from any MCP client over stdio.
Generate images from text prompts with Ideogram 3.0 or 4.0, including aspect ratio/resolution, rendering speed, style type, seed, negative prompt, and copyright detection.
Edit images with mask-based inpainting (black = edit, white = keep).
Remix/transform an image with a new prompt and adjustable image weight (0-100).
Reframe/outpaint an image to one of 69 target resolutions.
Replace an image background while preserving the foreground subject.
Upscale images with guided enhancement and resemblance/detail controls.
Describe an image as text using V_2 or V_3 describe models.
Apply style controls: up to 3 style reference images, a character reference image with optional mask, style codes, style presets, and preset/custom color palettes.
Use local .png/.jpg/.jpeg/.webp inputs up to 25 MB each (50 MB total per multi-file request) and save outputs to a configured directory with guarded downloads and validation.
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@ideogram-mcpGenerate a realistic image of an astronaut holding a flower"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
@qmediat.io/ideogram-mcp
MCP server for the Ideogram platform through its v2 API: every image and video model Ideogram sells through one API key — Ideogram 4.5, 4.0, 3.0, 2a and 2.0, GPT Image, Nano Banana, P-Image, Z-Image, the Topaz upscalers; Seedance 2.5 and 2, Kling 3, MiniMax H3 for video — for generate, precise edit, inpaint, remix, reframe, replace background, remove background, remove object, upscale, describe, layerize and video (from a prompt, an image or references), the commercial tools (ad localizer, resizer and variations, colorways, ghost mannequin, material swap, model pose variants, sketch to render), the utilities (magic prompt, layerize logos, provenance, snap mask), plus the account's usage, invoices and keys and custom-model training, from Claude Code, Claude Desktop or any MCP client over stdio. Every call can be priced first (the API's own dry run), long jobs are returned by id and collected later, and any other operation the release serves is one validated raw call away. Built from Ideogram's OpenAPI specification (ADR-0001).
Why this server?
The platform, not one model —
modelon every tool, with each model's own fields (a field the model does not take is refused, naming the models that do). The model lists and fields come from Ideogram's specification, so a new model is a reviewed snapshot update, not a rewritePrice before you pay —
ideogram_quoteasks the API what exactly this call would cost (USD and credits; nothing generated or billed)Private by default — every curated tool whose model takes
privatesends it astrueunless you set it (on remove background, replace background and theautomodels the API's own default is your plan's setting); a model without the field (reframe with Ideogram 3.0, remove object) follows the API's own behaviour, andideogram_apisends what you give itNever billed twice — a job is returned the moment Ideogram accepts it; the tool waits up to
wait_sand otherwise hands back thegeneration_idforideogram_generation. A request is resent only when it never left the machine or got a 429Everything else, validated —
ideogram_operationslists what the API offers;ideogram_apicalls any served operation by id, checked against its own schema firstGuarded I/O — per-operation upload limits checked before any file is read, streamed downloads with a 50 MB cap (512 MB for a video) from allow-listed HTTPS hosts, typed 402/429 errors that say what to do (details)
2 runtime dependencies —
@modelcontextprotocol/sdk+zod; nativefetch
Related MCP server: ideogram-mcp-server
Quick Start
Requires Node.js 22 or newer and an IDEOGRAM_API_KEY — create one in Ideogram's API dashboard at ideogram.ai/platform → API Keys → Create key (setup guide).
claude mcp add --scope user ideogram -e IDEOGRAM_API_KEY=your-api-key -e IDEOGRAM_OUTPUT_DIR=/tmp/ideogram-output -- npx -y @qmediat.io/ideogram-mcpor by hand (below). npm install -g @qmediat.io/ideogram-mcp installs the ideogram-mcp command, which can replace the npx line in any config.
Configuration
Claude Code
Add to ~/.claude.json → mcpServers:
{
"ideogram": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@qmediat.io/ideogram-mcp"],
"env": {
"IDEOGRAM_API_KEY": "your-api-key",
"IDEOGRAM_OUTPUT_DIR": "/tmp/ideogram-output"
}
}
}Claude Desktop
Add to claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"ideogram": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@qmediat.io/ideogram-mcp"],
"env": {
"IDEOGRAM_API_KEY": "your-api-key",
"IDEOGRAM_OUTPUT_DIR": "/tmp/ideogram-output"
}
}
}
}Environment Variables
Variable | Required | Default | Description |
| Yes | — | Your Ideogram API key (ideogram.ai/platform → API Keys) |
| No |
| Any folder where you want images saved. Use absolute paths (e.g. |
Available Tools
Tool | What it does | Models |
| Images from a text prompt |
|
| Edit an image at its exact size: a prompt, an optional mask (black = edit), up to 4 reference images, |
|
| Repaint the masked part of an image (black = repaint) |
|
| The 1.x name of | as inpaint |
| New images from a source image and a prompt |
|
| Extend an image to a new size (outpainting) |
|
| A new background, the subject kept |
|
| The foreground as a transparent PNG |
|
| Remove what the mask marks (white = remove) and fill the gap |
|
| Enlarge an image |
|
| Describe an image: words ( |
|
| A video from a prompt: duration, aspect ratio, resolution, audio per model; saved as mp4 (give |
|
| A video from a start image (and an end image): files, URLs or assets |
|
| A video guided by reference images, MP3/WAV clips (2-30 s on Seedance 2.5, 2-15 s elsewhere) and videos stored with Ideogram, in prompt order; at least one reference image or video |
|
| A flat image as an editable design: the text-free base image (saved) and the detected text blocks (JSON: text, position, font, size, colour); optional |
|
| Translate an ad's copy into one language, keeping layout, logos and product; | one operation ( |
| Reframe an ad to a platform's exact ad size inside its safe zone | one operation ( |
| Vary an ad along one axis: people, setting, group_size or scene | one operation ( |
| Recolor a product photo: up to 4 masks paired with hex colours | one operation ( |
| A garment on an invisible mannequin from its photos, in the view asked | one operation ( |
| Apply reference materials to the masked regions of a product photo | one operation ( |
| Re-pose the model of a fashion image by instruction | one operation ( |
| Render a fashion sketch as a product photo | one operation ( |
| Rewrite a prompt into an Ideogram 4.0 structured JSON prompt (nothing generated) | one operation ( |
| Detect and remove reference logos from a flat design: the base image saved, the layers listed | one operation ( |
| Check whether an image was created by Ideogram (free) | one operation ( |
| Snap a hand-drawn mask to the object it marks; the PNG saved | one operation ( |
| The price of a call: | every operation that offers a dry run (not describe, ad variations, pose variants, sketch to render, nor the v1 utilities) |
| Collect a generation by | — |
| Billed usage as Ideogram reports it: buckets of line items summed per product and currency, the buckets handed on (the shape ai-cost reads); default the last 7 days by day | — |
| The organization's invoices with their line items (organization-admin key) | — |
| The organization's API keys, redacted (organization-admin key) | — |
| Your training datasets: the list (searched by name) or one with its files and models | — |
| Images, .txt captions and .zip archives into a dataset (an existing one, or a new one from a name); local paths or public https URLs | — |
| Train a custom model from a dataset of 15–100 images; hyperparameters route to the advanced operation |
|
| Your custom models and the shared ones, or one with its training runs; a completed model's | — |
| What the API offers: families, operations, fields, limits | — |
| Any served operation by id, including the ones the documentation index does not list (the reframe models | — |
Each model's fields are listed in the tool's schema (one variant per model) and in docs/API-REFERENCE.md, generated from the specification. Image inputs are local file paths or public https URLs (or Ideogram asset identifiers where a model takes them); each operation's own upload limits apply, checked each file against its field's limit before any is read, the whole encoded request against the request cap before it is sent.
A client without files: URL inputs and inline images
Any file field (image, images, mask, the reference and style images, the font files) takes a public https://
URL beside a local path: the file is fetched under the field's own limit and types, from a public host only (no IP
address, no local name, no private address, no redirect), inside the call's budget, one input after another.
inline_images: true on any tool that saves images returns each saved image under 3.75 MB, up to 10 MB per result,
as image content beside the text (the others stay by path), so a client that cannot read this machine's files still
sees the result. Both are off unless asked.
Usage, invoices, webhooks
ideogram_usage asks GET /v2/account/usage for a range (RFC 3339 times; 1d buckets over at most 92 days, 1h
over at most 168 hours — the tool refuses a longer one before asking; the api and app sources) and answers with
the sums per product, unit and currency — decimal strings, never floats; an amount it cannot read is counted, not
summed — and writes the buckets exactly as Ideogram sent them to a JSON file in the output directory (named by the
query, readable by the owner only — the line items carry member emails and key prefixes; printed too when under
64 KB): the shape a cost tool reads. The invoices and the API keys are written and shown the same way, and so is an
answer off its specification (reported as such, never as a success). All three account tools need an API key owned by an organization
admin (Ideogram answers 404 to any other key, and the tool says so with Ideogram's words).
Ideogram signs its webhooks with Ed25519: the canonical message is request_id\nuser_id\ntimestamp\nsha256_hex(body),
the signature travels in X-Ideogram-Webhook-Signature (the key id in X-Ideogram-Webhook-Key-Id), the public keys
are the JWKS at GET https://api.ideogram.ai/v1/.well-known/jwks.json (public; cache up to 24 h). Where request_id,
user_id and timestamp travel is not stated by the specification (it names the two signature headers only): take
them from the delivery as Ideogram's webhook documentation says. The receiver — not this server, which has no public
URL — verifies with the helper this package ships; a delivery whose timestamp is more than maxAgeS (300 s by
default; Infinity turns it off) from now is refused as a replay — the signature alone never expires:
import { verifyWebhook } from "@qmediat.io/ideogram-mcp/dist/webhooks.js";
const kid = verifyWebhook(
{ body, requestId, userId, timestamp, signature: headers["x-ideogram-webhook-signature"], keyId: headers["x-ideogram-webhook-key-id"] },
jwks,
{ maxAgeS: 300 },
);
if (kid === null) reject(); // the key id that verified, else nullTraining a custom model
Drop a folder of references: ideogram_dataset_upload {"name": "brand refs", "files": ["…/1.png", "…/1.txt", "…/more.zip"]}
creates the dataset and uploads the assets (a caption sidecar x.txt goes with x.png; an archive may hold both),
ideogram_train {"dataset_id": "…", "model_name": "Brand Refs"} starts an Ideogram 4.0 training ("model": "ideogram-3"
for 3.0; training_steps, lora_rank, ema, learning_rate — and for 4.0 batch_size, base_variant,
wandb_project — route to the advanced operation), ideogram_models {"model_id": "…"} follows it, and a COMPLETED
model's custom_model_uri generates through ideogram_generate with model: "ideogram-4-custom-model". Training is
billed by Ideogram per its plan; the tools say what was started, never start it twice.
Waiting, and collecting later
A generation is sent asynchronously and returned the moment Ideogram accepts it. The tool then waits up to wait_s seconds (default 45, at most 50: MCP clients time a call out at 60 s), polling at 2 s, ×1.5, up to 30 s apart. A job still running at the end of the wait comes back as its generation_id: ideogram_generation {"generation_id": "…"} collects it later, in this session or another. Sending the request again would start — and bill — a second job.
Every tool call has one budget, fixed when it starts: 55 s (the caller's 60 s minus a margin), ended earlier by the
caller's own cancellation (a client that times out or a user who cancels). Every request, retry sleep (Retry-After
included), poll and download of the call is judged against what remains of it, so nothing of a call outlives its caller
and a request that creates work is never resent after the caller has given up: a POST is resent only when the time left
also covers an attempt as long as the one just rejected. A download the budget cuts is listed as not saved beside the
generation id; ideogram_generation saves it in a new call. What that leaves open: an upload that needs more than 55 s
cannot be served inside one MCP call at all; a request the budget cuts while it is in flight is reported as possibly
accepted (never resent); and a job the API accepts after the caller gave up keeps an id nobody receives — a limit of
the 60 s client, not of this server.
Prices
ideogram_quote sends exactly the request the tool would send, with Ideogram's dry_run: the answer is the price in USD and credits (at your account's credit rate), exact or an estimate with its upper bound; nothing is generated, stored or billed. Describe has no dry run, so it cannot be quoted. A completed generation shows the cost Ideogram reports for it. This server keeps no price table: prices are the API's, per request.
Compatibility with 1.x
Calls written for 1.x keep working through 2.x, and the result says what was mapped:
1.x input | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| refused (v2 has no FLASH) — |
| lowercase |
|
|
|
|
A 1.x field that the chosen v2 model does not take is refused with the models that take it (the changelog has the full table).
The raw call
ideogram_api runs any operation this release serves — the curated ones and every other /v2/image operation (the reframe models the documentation index does not list) — by its id, with its parameters kept in their places: {"operation": "…", "params": {"path": {}, "query": {}, "body": {}}, "files": [{"field": "image", "path": "…"}], "dry_run": false}. The parameters are checked against the operation's own schema and rules before anything is sent. Operations Ideogram's documentation does not list need allow_undocumented: true; web-app (Bearer) and internal operations are refused; the undocumented get_asset_reference_usage of the account family too; the customer-specific tools (skechers, swan, sole-swap) and the spec-only workflows run here and only here, behind allow_undocumented; the v1 model variants (ernie, flux-2 klein, the Ideogram 4.0 tiers, the P-Image tiers, design and graphic v3/v4) run here without opt-in — Ideogram documents them in its v1 reference (prefer an _async twin where one exists: a synchronous v1 generation must finish inside the call's budget); nothing is planned for a later release (plan).
Security
A defensive, minimal-dependency design:
SSRF protection — downloads over HTTPS only, from allow-listed hosts, redirects blocked; a URL given as an input is fetched from a public host only (no IP literal, no local name, no private or special-purpose address after resolution, no redirect), under the call's budget, over a connection pinned to the address that was judged (a DNS rebinding reaches nothing)
Symlink rejection —
lstat()rejects a symlinked input file before reading (a symlinked parent directory is resolved)Upload limits per operation — each file checked with
stat()against its field's limit before any is read; the local file name is never sent (a file goes as<field>.<ext>) — except a training asset's own name (never its directory), which the API pairs captions byStreamed, capped downloads — written to disk with a byte counter, stopped at 50 MB (512 MB for a video), the partial file removed; a video that cannot download within the call's budget (55 s) is "Not saved" with its link, for you to fetch before it expires;
image/*orvideo/mp4requiredSchema validation — inputs against each model's generated schema before any request; a success response the specification's schema rejects is reported as a contract mismatch, never as a success
Input paths — the model may name any readable image file on the machine for upload; run the server as a user whose readable images you are willing to send to Ideogram
Full details in SECURITY.md.
Development
git clone https://github.com/qmediat/ideogram-mcp.git
cd ideogram-mcp
npm install
npm run build
npm run typecheck
npm run lint # structure rules, repeated blocks, the baseline ratchet (docs/SYSTEMIC.md §1)
npm run format # Prettier (npm run lint checks it)
npm test # builds, then every test against a fake API (no key, no network); with IDEOGRAM_API_KEY set, the live dry-run suite runs too (below)The specification snapshot drives the code: npm ci --prefix scripts/spec-gen && npm run spec:generate regenerates
src/generated/ (CI checks it with npm run spec:check), npm run docs:api the API reference, npm run spec:pull
compares the live specification with the snapshot. These scripts need Node.js 22.18 or newer (type stripping), and so
does npm run lint (its Babel 8 parser: 22.18+ or 24.11+).
With IDEOGRAM_API_KEY set, test/live-dry-run.test.mjs quotes every curated model at no cost and writes the prices
to docs/PRICES-<date>.md.
Run locally:
IDEOGRAM_API_KEY=your-key node dist/index.jsContributing
See CONTRIBUTING.md for architecture guidelines and PR requirements.
Trademarks and affiliation
Ideogram is a trademark of Ideogram. This is an independent, community-maintained integration published by Quantum Media Technologies sp. z o.o.; it is not affiliated with, sponsored by or endorsed by Ideogram. Use of the Ideogram API through this server is subject to Ideogram's own terms and to your own API key or account.
License
MIT — Quantum Media Technologies
Made by Quantum Media Technologies · more open source from qmediat
Available Tools
7 toolsideogram_describeA
Generate a text description of an image (Ideogram's describe endpoint). Accepts a local file path.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| image | Yes | Local file path of the image to describe | |
| describe_model_version | No | Model version to use (default: V_3) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden. It discloses the input shape ('local file path') and the output category ('text description'), but says nothing about permissions, whether the source file is modified, cost, or how model version changes results. Adequate but thin for an unannotated tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two short sentences, front-loaded with the action, with no filler. The second sentence is somewhat redundant with the schema's image parameter, which keeps it from a 5.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is simple (2 params, 1 required, no output schema), and the description covers action, input, and output type, which is largely sufficient. Minor gaps around model-version tradeoffs and output format remain, but nothing an agent needs to invoke it is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so both parameters (image path and describe_model_version enum) are already documented in the schema. The description's 'Accepts a local file path' merely restates the schema and adds no new semantics, matching the baseline of 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific verb+resource ('generate a text description of an image') and names the backing endpoint, which clearly separates it from the image-mutation siblings (generate, edit, upscale, reframe). It stops short of explicitly contrasting itself with those siblings, but the purpose is unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Usage is implied: call this when you need a caption/description of an existing image rather than a new or edited one. There is no explicit when-to-use/when-not statement or named alternative, but the sibling set makes the selection fairly obvious.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
ideogram_editB
Edit specific areas of an image using mask-based inpainting. Requires source image, mask (black=edit, white=keep), and prompt; takes the style and character references, style codes, preset and palette (no exact resolution: inpaint keeps the source size).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| mask | Yes | Local file path of the mask image (black = regions to edit, white = keep) | |
| seed | No | Reproducibility seed | |
| image | Yes | Local file path of the source image to edit | |
| prompt | Yes | Description of desired changes | |
| num_images | No | Number of variations (1-8, default: 1) | |
| style_type | No | Visual style (the API default is GENERAL when omitted) | |
| style_codes | No | 8-character hexadecimal style codes from Ideogram | |
| magic_prompt | No | Auto-enhance prompts (default: AUTO) | |
| style_preset | No | A named style preset as Ideogram lists them | |
| color_palette | No | A preset palette by name, or explicit colours with weights (not both) | |
| rendering_speed | No | Speed/quality tradeoff (default: DEFAULT) | |
| style_reference_images | No | Local image files whose style the result follows (up to 3, 25 MB each) | |
| character_reference_mask | No | Grayscale mask of the character reference (same dimensions); needs character_reference_image | |
| character_reference_image | No | Local image file of a character to keep consistent (one image; Ideogram bills character references at its own rate) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the burden and does disclose useful behavior: mask semantics, required inputs, and that inpainting keeps the source resolution. However, it omits return format, side effects, auth/cost context, and other operational traits an agent would need for a mutation-style image edit.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is front-loaded with the core purpose and avoids filler. It is somewhat dense with semicolons and parentheticals, but every clause contributes relevant information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a 14-parameter tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is adequate but incomplete: it does not explain what the tool returns or how many images/variations are produced. The rich input schema covers parameters, reducing the burden, but output and operational context remain gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all 14 parameters in detail. The description summarizes optional style/character inputs and adds the resolution caveat, but adds little parameter-level meaning beyond what the structured schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Edit specific areas of an image using mask-based inpainting.' This is clear and method-specific, distinguishing it practically from upscale/reframe/background-replacement siblings, but it does not explicitly name or compare against any sibling tool.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Usage is implied by the mask-based inpainting method and the listed required inputs (source image, mask, prompt), but there is no explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or alternative-tool guidance. The agent can infer the context but is not routed between this and siblings.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
ideogram_generateB
Generate images from text prompts with Ideogram 3.0 (default) or 4.0 (model: '4.0'). 3.0 takes aspect ratios or an exact resolution, style types, style and character reference images, style codes, presets, colour palettes and custom models.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| seed | No | Reproducibility seed (0-2,147,483,647) | |
| model | No | Ideogram model: 3.0 (default; every parameter below) or 4.0 (text prompt, resolution, rendering_speed except FLASH, enable_copyright_detection — the other parameters are refused) | |
| prompt | Yes | Image description (1-10,000 characters) | |
| num_images | No | Number of images to generate (1-8, default: 1) | |
| resolution | No | Exact output resolution: one of Ideogram 3.0's 69 sizes, or any WIDTHxHEIGHT for model 4.0; not with aspect_ratio | |
| style_type | No | Visual style (the API default is GENERAL when omitted) | |
| style_codes | No | 8-character hexadecimal style codes from Ideogram | |
| aspect_ratio | No | Output aspect ratio (default: 1x1) | |
| magic_prompt | No | Auto-enhance prompts (default: AUTO) | |
| style_preset | No | A named style preset as Ideogram lists them | |
| color_palette | No | A preset palette by name, or explicit colours with weights (not both) | |
| negative_prompt | No | What to exclude from the generated image | |
| rendering_speed | No | Speed/quality tradeoff. FLASH=fastest, QUALITY=best (default: DEFAULT) | |
| custom_model_uri | No | A custom (trained) model: model/<name>/version/<version> | |
| style_reference_images | No | Local image files whose style the result follows (up to 3, 25 MB each) | |
| character_reference_mask | No | Grayscale mask of the character reference (same dimensions); needs character_reference_image | |
| character_reference_image | No | Local image file of a character to keep consistent (one image; Ideogram bills character references at its own rate) | |
| enable_copyright_detection | No | true runs Ideogram's copyright detection on this request; false leaves the organisation setting in force (it cannot switch an organisation-wide detection off) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden, yet it offers no cost, rate-limit, latency, or output-handling information. The feature list for 3.0 largely duplicates what the schema already documents, adding minimal behavioral insight beyond the default-model note.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences with the model/version distinction front-loaded. The second sentence is a somewhat loose enumeration, but it stays short and every clause maps to real capability.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For an 18-parameter generative tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is thin: it says nothing about return values, asynchronous generation, or billing implications of reference images. It does not compensate for the absent structured context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so each of the 18 parameters is already documented in detail. The description's parameter mentions (aspect ratios, resolution, style codes, presets, palettes) restate schema content without adding format or interaction detail, so the baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific verb+resource ('Generate images from text prompts') and identifies the two model versions with the default flagged. It doesn't differentiate itself from siblings like ideogram_edit or ideogram_remix, but the core purpose is unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
It notes that 3.0 is the default and that 4.0 is opt-in via model: '4.0', and lists what 3.0 supports, which implicitly guides model choice. However it never states when to prefer 4.0 over 3.0, nor when to use this tool versus edit/remix/upscale siblings.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
ideogram_reframeB
Extend an image to a new resolution via outpainting. Specify target resolution (e.g. 1024x1024, 1536x640).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| seed | No | Reproducibility seed | |
| image | Yes | Local file path of the source image to reframe | |
| num_images | No | Number of variations (1-8, default: 1) | |
| resolution | Yes | Target resolution (e.g. 1024x1024, 1536x640). See Ideogram docs for all 69 valid resolutions. | |
| rendering_speed | No | Speed/quality tradeoff (default: DEFAULT) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only says the operation is outpainting; it does not state whether the original file is modified, what kind of result is returned, whether output is saved to disk, or how the reframed image is delivered.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two short sentences, no filler, and the core action is front-loaded. The example target resolutions are helpful and directly relevant to the required resolution parameter.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema and no annotations, the description should explain what the tool returns or produces after outpainting, but it does not. It also omits behavior around num_images and rendering_speed, leaving an agent without enough context to fully understand the call's result.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% and each parameter already has a description, so the baseline is 3. The description adds only an example resolution format, which the schema's enum already covers, and provides no additional meaning for seed, num_images, or rendering_speed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Extend an image to a new resolution via outpainting.' This clearly communicates the core operation and distinguishes it from siblings like upscale, edit, and remix by naming the outpainting technique.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage context through 'extend an image to a new resolution via outpainting,' but it never explicitly says when to choose this over siblings or when not to use it. No alternatives are named, leaving the agent to infer selection from the verb alone.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
ideogram_remixC
Transform an image with a new prompt while preserving characteristics. Control influence with image_weight (0-100); takes the style and character references, style codes, preset, palette and an exact resolution.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| seed | No | Reproducibility seed | |
| image | Yes | Local file path of the source image to remix | |
| prompt | Yes | New creative direction | |
| num_images | No | Number of variations (1-8, default: 1) | |
| resolution | No | Exact output resolution (one of Ideogram's 69 sizes); not with aspect_ratio | |
| style_type | No | Visual style (the API default is GENERAL when omitted) | |
| style_codes | No | 8-character hexadecimal style codes from Ideogram | |
| aspect_ratio | No | Output aspect ratio | |
| image_weight | No | Original image influence (0-100, default: 50) | |
| magic_prompt | No | Auto-enhance prompts (default: AUTO) | |
| style_preset | No | A named style preset as Ideogram lists them | |
| color_palette | No | A preset palette by name, or explicit colours with weights (not both) | |
| negative_prompt | No | What to exclude | |
| rendering_speed | No | Speed/quality tradeoff (default: DEFAULT) | |
| style_reference_images | No | Local image files whose style the result follows (up to 3, 25 MB each) | |
| character_reference_mask | No | Grayscale mask of the character reference (same dimensions); needs character_reference_image | |
| character_reference_image | No | Local image file of a character to keep consistent (one image; Ideogram bills character references at its own rate) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It hints at what inputs are accepted (style/character references, style codes, preset, palette, exact resolution) but says nothing about cost, permissions, latency, rate limits, or what the tool returns. The one genuinely behavioral detail, image_weight influencing fidelity to the source, is thin for a 17-parameter generation tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two tight sentences with the core action front-loaded and the control knob second. The second sentence is a bit of a parameter list, but nothing is padded or redundant in a wasteful way.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a 17-parameter image-generation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is inadequate: it omits how the tool differs from sibling remix/edit tools, does not explain interactions among the style inputs, and says nothing about results or cost despite character references carrying billing implications.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents every parameter including ranges and mutual exclusions (resolution vs aspect_ratio). The description adds the image_weight (0-100) range, which merely repeats the schema, and otherwise only names a subset of the parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb and resource: transform an image with a new prompt while preserving its characteristics. It reads clearly as an image-to-image remix, but never names or contrasts itself with the closest siblings (ideogram_edit, ideogram_generate), leaving the agent to infer the boundary.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
There is no when-to-use guidance, no when-not-to-use, and no mention of alternatives. The only usage-flavored sentence is about tuning image_weight, which is a knob, not a selection criterion between this tool and ideogram_edit or ideogram_generate.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
ideogram_replace_backgroundB
Replace the background of an image while preserving the foreground subject. Describe the new background in the prompt.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| seed | No | Reproducibility seed | |
| image | Yes | Local file path of the source image | |
| prompt | Yes | Description of the new background | |
| num_images | No | Number of variations (1-8, default: 1) | |
| magic_prompt | No | Auto-enhance prompts (default: AUTO) | |
| rendering_speed | No | Speed/quality tradeoff (default: DEFAULT) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure. It does state one behavioral trait—preserving the foreground subject—which is helpful, but it does not disclose the output format, whether the input file is modified or a new file is generated, or any side effects. This is insufficient for a mutation tool with no schema description of return values.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that states the core action and the prompt requirement with no filler. It is appropriately concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with six parameters and no output schema, the description is quite sparse. It does not mention that the output is an image, how many variations are produced by default, or the effect of optional parameters like 'num_images' or 'rendering_speed'. These are present in the schema but the description does not tie them together for the agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description's instruction to 'Describe the new background in the prompt' essentially repeats the schema's definition of the 'prompt' parameter, adding no new insight. No other parameters are mentioned in the description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Replace'), names the resource ('background of an image'), and adds a distinguishing constraint ('preserving the foreground subject'). This clearly differentiates it from siblings like ideogram_generate or ideogram_describe, so an agent can select it correctly.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description only states what the tool does and how to use the prompt, but does not provide any explicit guidance on when to choose this tool over alternatives like ideogram_edit or ideogram_reframe. Usage is only implied by the tool's name and purpose, with no exclusion or alternative routing.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
ideogram_upscaleB
Upscale an image to higher resolution with guided enhancement. Control resemblance (0-100) and detail (0-100).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| seed | No | Reproducibility seed | |
| image | Yes | Local file path of the image to upscale | |
| detail | No | Detail to add (0-100, default: 50) | |
| prompt | No | Guide the upscaling enhancement | |
| num_images | No | Number of variations (1-8, default: 1) | |
| resemblance | No | Similarity to original (0-100, default: 50) | |
| magic_prompt | No | Auto-enhance prompts (AUTO/ON/OFF) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries full responsibility. It mentions 'guided enhancement' and the resemblance/detail controls but does not disclose side effects, output format, or whether the original image is modified. It lacks any mention of rate limits or auth requirements.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single concise sentence that front-loads the core purpose and mentions the two most relevant controls. Every word earns its place, with no fluff or repetition.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with 7 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is grossly insufficient. It omits crucial details such as how the output is returned, how to use the prompt, what magic_prompt does, and any side effects or prerequisites. An agent would struggle to invoke this correctly without additional context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema covers all parameters (100% coverage), so the baseline is 3. The description adds marginal value by highlighting resemblance and detail as key controls, but it does not explain the prompt, seed, num_images, or magic_prompt parameters beyond what the schema already provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific verb ('Upscale') and resource ('an image to higher resolution'), and the 'guided enhancement' phrase adds context. It clearly distinguishes from sibling tools like generate, edit, or remix, which perform different actions.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus the other ideogram tools. It does not mention that this is for upscaling only, nor does it exclude other use cases or reference alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
3 tool updates
v1.2.0- Changed
ideogram_edit9 fields changed- added
Input schema / additionalPropertiesAdded value: +false - added
Input schema / properties / character_reference_imageAdded value: +{ + "description": "Local image file of a character to keep consistent (one image; Ideogram bills character references at its own rate)", + "minLength": 1, + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / character_reference_maskAdded value: +{ + "description": "Grayscale mask of the character reference (same dimensions); needs character_reference_image", + "minLength": 1, + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / color_paletteAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "name": { + "description": "A preset palette", + "enum": [ + "EMBER", + "FRESH", + "JUNGLE", + "MAGIC", + "MELON", + "MOSAIC", + "PASTEL", + "ULTRAMARINE" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "name" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "members": { + "description": "Explicit colours, most dominant first", + "items": { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "color_hex": { + "description": "The colour, #RRGGBB", + "pattern": "^#[0-9A-Fa-f]{6}$", + "type": "string" + }, + "color_weight": { + "description": "Its share of the palette (0.05-1)", + "maximum": 1, + "minimum": 0.05, + "type": "number" + } + }, + "required": [ + "color_hex" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "maxItems": 10, + "minItems": 1, + "type": "array" + } + }, + "required": [ + "members" + ], + "type": "object" + } + ], + "description": "A preset palette by name, or explicit colours with weights (not both)" +} - changed
Input schema / properties / mask / descriptionPrevious value: -"Local file path of the mask image (black=edit, white=keep, min 10% black)"New value: +"Local file path of the mask image (black = regions to edit, white = keep)" - added
Input schema / properties / style_codesAdded value: +{ + "description": "8-character hexadecimal style codes from Ideogram", + "items": { + "pattern": "^[0-9A-Fa-f]{8}$", + "type": "string" + }, + "maxItems": 8, + "minItems": 1, + "type": "array" +} - added
Input schema / properties / style_presetAdded value: +{ + "description": "A named style preset as Ideogram lists them", + "maxLength": 100, + "minLength": 1, + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / style_reference_imagesAdded value: +{ + "description": "Local image files whose style the result follows (up to 3, 25 MB each)", + "items": { + "minLength": 1, + "type": "string" + }, + "maxItems": 3, + "minItems": 1, + "type": "array" +} - changed
Input schema / properties / style_type / descriptionPrevious value: -"Visual style (default: AUTO)"New value: +"Visual style (the API default is GENERAL when omitted)"
- Changed
ideogram_generate12 fields changed- added
Input schema / additionalPropertiesAdded value: +false - added
Input schema / properties / character_reference_imageAdded value: +{ + "description": "Local image file of a character to keep consistent (one image; Ideogram bills character references at its own rate)", + "minLength": 1, + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / character_reference_maskAdded value: +{ + "description": "Grayscale mask of the character reference (same dimensions); needs character_reference_image", + "minLength": 1, + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / color_paletteAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "name": { + "description": "A preset palette", + "enum": [ + "EMBER", + "FRESH", + "JUNGLE", + "MAGIC", + "MELON", + "MOSAIC", + "PASTEL", + "ULTRAMARINE" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "name" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "members": { + "description": "Explicit colours, most dominant first", + "items": { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "color_hex": { + "description": "The colour, #RRGGBB", + "pattern": "^#[0-9A-Fa-f]{6}$", + "type": "string" + }, + "color_weight": { + "description": "Its share of the palette (0.05-1)", + "maximum": 1, + "minimum": 0.05, + "type": "number" + } + }, + "required": [ + "color_hex" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "maxItems": 10, + "minItems": 1, + "type": "array" + } + }, + "required": [ + "members" + ], + "type": "object" + } + ], + "description": "A preset palette by name, or explicit colours with weights (not both)" +} - added
Input schema / properties / custom_model_uriAdded value: +{ + "description": "A custom (trained) model: model/<name>/version/<version>", + "pattern": "^model\\/[^/\\s]+\\/version\\/[^/\\s]+$", + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / enable_copyright_detectionAdded value: +{ + "description": "true runs Ideogram's copyright detection on this request; false leaves the organisation setting in force (it cannot switch an organisation-wide detection off)", + "type": "boolean" +} - added
Input schema / properties / modelAdded value: +{ + "description": "Ideogram model: 3.0 (default; every parameter below) or 4.0 (text prompt, resolution, rendering_speed except FLASH, enable_copyright_detection — the other parameters are refused)", + "enum": [ + "3.0", + "4.0" + ], + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / resolutionAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "enum": [ + "512x1536", + "576x1408", + "576x1472", + "576x1536", + "640x1344", + "640x1408", + "640x1472", + "640x1536", + "704x1152", + "704x1216", + "704x1280", + "704x1344", + "704x1408", + "704x1472", + "736x1312", + "768x1088", + "768x1216", + "768x1280", + "768x1344", + "800x1280", + "832x960", + "832x1024", + "832x1088", + "832x1152", + "832x1216", + "832x1248", + "864x1152", + "896x960", + "896x1024", + "896x1088", + "896x1120", + "896x1152", + "960x832", + "960x896", + "960x1024", + "960x1088", + "1024x832", + "1024x896", + "1024x960", + "1024x1024", + "1088x768", + "1088x832", + "1088x896", + "1088x960", + "1120x896", + "1152x704", + "1152x832", + "1152x864", + "1152x896", + "1216x704", + "1216x768", + "1216x832", + "1248x832", + "1280x704", + "1280x768", + "1280x800", + "1312x736", + "1344x640", + "1344x704", + "1344x768", + "1408x576", + "1408x640", + "1408x704", + "1472x576", + "1472x640", + "1472x704", + "1536x512", + "1536x576", + "1536x640" + ], + "type": "string" + }, + { + "pattern": "^\\d{3,4}x\\d{3,4}$", + "type": "string" + } + ], + "description": "Exact output resolution: one of Ideogram 3.0's 69 sizes, or any WIDTHxHEIGHT for model 4.0; not with aspect_ratio" +} - added
Input schema / properties / style_codesAdded value: +{ + "description": "8-character hexadecimal style codes from Ideogram", + "items": { + "pattern": "^[0-9A-Fa-f]{8}$", + "type": "string" + }, + "maxItems": 8, + "minItems": 1, + "type": "array" +} - added
Input schema / properties / style_presetAdded value: +{ + "description": "A named style preset as Ideogram lists them", + "maxLength": 100, + "minLength": 1, + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / style_reference_imagesAdded value: +{ + "description": "Local image files whose style the result follows (up to 3, 25 MB each)", + "items": { + "minLength": 1, + "type": "string" + }, + "maxItems": 3, + "minItems": 1, + "type": "array" +} - changed
Input schema / properties / style_type / descriptionPrevious value: -"Visual style (default: AUTO)"New value: +"Visual style (the API default is GENERAL when omitted)"
- Changed
ideogram_remix9 fields changed- added
Input schema / additionalPropertiesAdded value: +false - added
Input schema / properties / character_reference_imageAdded value: +{ + "description": "Local image file of a character to keep consistent (one image; Ideogram bills character references at its own rate)", + "minLength": 1, + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / character_reference_maskAdded value: +{ + "description": "Grayscale mask of the character reference (same dimensions); needs character_reference_image", + "minLength": 1, + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / color_paletteAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "name": { + "description": "A preset palette", + "enum": [ + "EMBER", + "FRESH", + "JUNGLE", + "MAGIC", + "MELON", + "MOSAIC", + "PASTEL", + "ULTRAMARINE" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "name" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "members": { + "description": "Explicit colours, most dominant first", + "items": { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "color_hex": { + "description": "The colour, #RRGGBB", + "pattern": "^#[0-9A-Fa-f]{6}$", + "type": "string" + }, + "color_weight": { + "description": "Its share of the palette (0.05-1)", + "maximum": 1, + "minimum": 0.05, + "type": "number" + } + }, + "required": [ + "color_hex" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "maxItems": 10, + "minItems": 1, + "type": "array" + } + }, + "required": [ + "members" + ], + "type": "object" + } + ], + "description": "A preset palette by name, or explicit colours with weights (not both)" +} - added
Input schema / properties / resolutionAdded value: +{ + "description": "Exact output resolution (one of Ideogram's 69 sizes); not with aspect_ratio", + "enum": [ + "512x1536", + "576x1408", + "576x1472", + "576x1536", + "640x1344", + "640x1408", + "640x1472", + "640x1536", + "704x1152", + "704x1216", + "704x1280", + "704x1344", + "704x1408", + "704x1472", + "736x1312", + "768x1088", + "768x1216", + "768x1280", + "768x1344", + "800x1280", + "832x960", + "832x1024", + "832x1088", + "832x1152", + "832x1216", + "832x1248", + "864x1152", + "896x960", + "896x1024", + "896x1088", + "896x1120", + "896x1152", + "960x832", + "960x896", + "960x1024", + "960x1088", + "1024x832", + "1024x896", + "1024x960", + "1024x1024", + "1088x768", + "1088x832", + "1088x896", + "1088x960", + "1120x896", + "1152x704", + "1152x832", + "1152x864", + "1152x896", + "1216x704", + "1216x768", + "1216x832", + "1248x832", + "1280x704", + "1280x768", + "1280x800", + "1312x736", + "1344x640", + "1344x704", + "1344x768", + "1408x576", + "1408x640", + "1408x704", + "1472x576", + "1472x640", + "1472x704", + "1536x512", + "1536x576", + "1536x640" + ], + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / style_codesAdded value: +{ + "description": "8-character hexadecimal style codes from Ideogram", + "items": { + "pattern": "^[0-9A-Fa-f]{8}$", + "type": "string" + }, + "maxItems": 8, + "minItems": 1, + "type": "array" +} - added
Input schema / properties / style_presetAdded value: +{ + "description": "A named style preset as Ideogram lists them", + "maxLength": 100, + "minLength": 1, + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / style_reference_imagesAdded value: +{ + "description": "Local image files whose style the result follows (up to 3, 25 MB each)", + "items": { + "minLength": 1, + "type": "string" + }, + "maxItems": 3, + "minItems": 1, + "type": "array" +} - changed
Input schema / properties / style_type / descriptionPrevious value: -"Visual style (default: AUTO)"New value: +"Visual style (the API default is GENERAL when omitted)"
7 tool updates
v1.0.3- First observed
ideogram_describe - First observed
ideogram_edit - First observed
ideogram_generate - First observed
ideogram_reframe - First observed
ideogram_remix - First observed
ideogram_replace_background - First observed
ideogram_upscale
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool targets a clearly distinct image operation: generation, description, background replacement, upscaling, masked inpainting, remixing, and outpainting. Although all modify images, the required inputs (mask, image_weight, target resolution) and descriptions make the boundaries unambiguous.
All tool names follow a consistent pattern: ideogram_ prefix plus a clear verb or verb_noun (generate, describe, replace_background, upscale, edit, remix, reframe). No mixing of conventions or case styles.
Seven tools is a well-scoped set for an image generation and editing API, covering core generation and advanced manipulation without bloat or notable omissions. Each tool earns its place.
The surface covers the full lifecycle of image creation and transformation: text-to-image, image description, background replacement, upscaling, masked editing, remixing, and outpainting. No obvious operational gaps for the stated Ideogram domain.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Generate AI images and videos from any compatible MCP client.
Generate images, video, audio and short films with 140+ AI models from any MCP client.
Generate AI images, video, music, and sound effects, and upscale them, from any MCP client.
Use AI models for chat, image, and video generation from Claude Code and other MCP hosts.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseDqualityDmaintenanceEnables image generation, editing, and description using Ideogram AI's models through natural language.453 npm4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables LLM applications to generate, edit, describe, upscale, remix, reframe, and replace backgrounds in images using the Ideogram AI API.17 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Ideogram V3 model line enabling image editing, reframing, remixing, and text-to-image generation with task polling and pricing checks through RunAPI.753 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables image generation, editing, and composition using any OpenAI-compatible Images API within MCP clients, Dify, and n8n, delivering results as image blocks, structured fields, or resource links.4MIT