Skip to main content
Glama
umshere

UIFlowchartCreator

by umshere
OverviewSchemaRelated ServersScoreDiscussions
TypeScript

Server Quality Checklist

67%
Profile completionA complete profile improves this server's visibility in search results.

  • Latest release: v1.0.0

  • Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined as generating UI flow diagrams from React/Angular repositories, making it distinct by default.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool follows a clear verb_noun pattern (generate_ui_flow), and with no other tools to compare, consistency is inherently perfect. There are no deviations or mixed conventions to evaluate.

    Tool Count2/5

    One tool is too few for a server named 'UIFlowchartCreator', which implies a broader scope of UI flowchart creation and management. A single tool feels thin and limits functionality, such as missing operations for editing, exporting, or analyzing existing diagrams.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete for the domain of UI flowchart creation. While generate_ui_flow covers initial diagram generation, there are significant gaps: no tools for updating, deleting, exporting, or viewing diagrams, and no lifecycle coverage beyond creation.

  • Average 3.1/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

    See the Tool Scores section below for per-tool breakdowns.

    • No issues in the last 6 months
    • No commit activity data available
    • No stable releases found
    • No critical vulnerability alerts
    • No high-severity vulnerability alerts
    • No code scanning findings
    • CI status not available

  • This repository is licensed under ISC License.

  • This repository includes a README.md file.

  • No tool usage detected in the last 30 days. Usage tracking helps demonstrate server value.

    Tip: use the "Try in Browser" feature on the server page to seed initial usage.

  • Add a glama.json file to provide metadata about your server.

  • If you are the author, simply .

    If the server belongs to an organization, first add glama.json to the root of your repository:

    {
  "$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/server.json",
  "maintainers": [
    "your-github-username"
  ]
}

    Then . Browse examples.

  • Add related servers to improve discoverability.

How to sync the server with GitHub?

Servers are automatically synced at least once per day, but you can also sync manually at any time to instantly update the server profile.

To manually sync the server, click the "Sync Server" button in the MCP server admin interface.

How is the quality score calculated?

The overall quality score combines two components: Tool Definition Quality (70%) and Server Coherence (30%).

Tool Definition Quality measures how well each tool describes itself to AI agents. Every tool is scored 1–5 across six dimensions: Purpose Clarity (25%), Usage Guidelines (20%), Behavioral Transparency (20%), Parameter Semantics (15%), Conciseness & Structure (10%), and Contextual Completeness (10%). The server-level definition quality score is calculated as 60% mean TDQS + 40% minimum TDQS, so a single poorly described tool pulls the score down.

Server Coherence evaluates how well the tools work together as a set, scoring four dimensions equally: Disambiguation (can agents tell tools apart?), Naming Consistency, Tool Count Appropriateness, and Completeness (are there gaps in the tool surface?).

Tiers are derived from the overall score: A (≥3.5), B (≥3.0), C (≥2.0), D (≥1.0), F (<1.0). B and above is considered passing.

Tool Scores

  • Behavior2/5

    Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

    No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions scanning codebases to identify components and relationships, but fails to describe critical behaviors like output format (e.g., diagram type, file format), performance implications (e.g., time to analyze large repos), error handling, or authentication needs for GitHub access. This leaves significant gaps for an agent to use the tool effectively.

    Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

    Conciseness4/5

    Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

    The description is concise and front-loaded, stating the core purpose in the first sentence. Both sentences are relevant, with the second elaborating on the scanning process. There's no unnecessary information, though it could be slightly more structured (e.g., separating purpose from behavior).

    Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

    Completeness2/5

    Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

    Given the complexity of analyzing codebases and generating diagrams, with no annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain what the output looks like (e.g., a visual diagram, JSON data), how errors are handled, or any limitations (e.g., supported React/Angular versions). This makes it inadequate for an agent to fully understand the tool's behavior and results.

    Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

    Parameters3/5

    Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

    Schema description coverage is 100%, with all parameters well-documented in the schema itself. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what's in the schema (e.g., it doesn't explain how 'fileExtensions' affect analysis or clarify 'repoPath' usage). With high schema coverage, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate, as the description doesn't compensate but also doesn't detract.

    Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

    Purpose4/5

    Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

    The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Generate a UI flow diagram by analyzing React/Angular repositories.' It specifies the verb ('generate'), resource ('UI flow diagram'), and scope ('React/Angular repositories'), making it easy to understand what the tool does. However, without sibling tools, it cannot demonstrate differentiation from alternatives, preventing a perfect score.

    Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

    Usage Guidelines3/5

    Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

    The description implies usage by mentioning 'React/Angular repositories,' suggesting it's for analyzing codebases in those frameworks. However, it lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus other analysis tools, prerequisites, or exclusions. No sibling tools are provided, so no alternative comparisons are possible.

    Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

GitHub Badge

Glama performs regular codebase and documentation scans to:

  • Confirm that the MCP server is working as expected.
  • Confirm that there are no obvious security issues.
  • Evaluate tool definition quality.

Our badge communicates server capabilities, safety, and installation instructions.

Card Badge

uiflowchartcreator MCP server

Copy to your README.md:

Score Badge

uiflowchartcreator MCP server

Copy to your README.md:

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/umshere/uiflowchartcreator'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server