Skip to main content
Glama
JayLathiaTR

MCP Leave Management

by JayLathiaTR

MCP Leave Management

A local Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that simulates a leave management workflow for employees and managers. The server is designed for local demos, connector testing, and iterative MCP tool development with Claude Desktop.

It supports employee discovery, leave balance checks, leave application, manager review flows, full approvals, partial approvals, and rejections against a seeded in-memory dataset.

Features

  • MCP server over stdio using the official @modelcontextprotocol/sdk

  • Employee and manager directory tools

  • Leave application with date validation and balance checks

  • Manager approval workflow scoped to the manager's own team

  • Partial approval support with separate approved and rejected day counts

  • Automatic leave balance deduction for approved days

  • Seeded demo data across Engineering, Finance, and HR

Related MCP server: HR Assistant Agent

Tool Catalog

The server currently exposes these MCP tools:

Tool

Purpose

ping

Health check for the MCP server

list_all_employees

List all people in the system, including managers with a position flag

list_all_managers

List managers only

check_leave_balance

Show available Annual, Sick, and Unpaid leave for a person

apply_leave

Submit a new leave request after validating dates and balance

list_employee_leaves

Show all leave requests for a specific person

list_pending_approvals

Show pending leave requests for a manager's direct team

approve_leave

Fully approve a pending leave request

partial_approve_leave

Approve part of a pending leave request and reject the remainder

reject_leave

Fully reject a pending leave request

Approval Rules

  • Leave duration is calculated as inclusive days between startDate and endDate

  • Dates must be in YYYY-MM-DD format

  • End date cannot be earlier than start date

  • Employees cannot submit leave beyond their available balance

  • Managers cannot approve more leave days than the employee currently has available

  • Managers can only review leave requests for employees who report to them directly

  • Partial approvals deduct only the approved number of days from the employee's balance

Seed Data

The demo dataset includes:

  • 14 employees

  • 7 managers

  • Departments: Engineering, Finance, HR

  • Sample names from multiple regions including Indian and Mexican names for demo variety

All data is stored in-memory in src/data.ts. Restarting the server resets all leave requests and balances back to the seeded state.

Project Structure

.
├── src/
│   ├── data.ts
│   └── index.ts
├── package.json
├── package-lock.json
├── tsconfig.json
└── README.md

Prerequisites

  • Node.js 18 or later

  • npm

  • Claude Desktop, if you want to test the server as an MCP connector

Local Setup

Install dependencies:

npm install

Run a type check:

npm run check

Build the server:

npm run build

Run the compiled server:

npm start

Run the server directly from TypeScript during development:

npm run dev

Claude Desktop Configuration

This server uses stdio transport. Claude Desktop should launch the process for you. You do not need to start the server manually before connecting it.

Example Claude Desktop MCP configuration:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "leave-management": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": [
        "C:/path/to/mcp-leave-management/dist/index.js"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Recommended workflow:

  1. Run npm run build

  2. Point Claude Desktop to node plus dist/index.js

  3. Reconnect Claude Desktop after each rebuild when you want it to load the latest server code

Development Notes

  • The project is configured as an ESM package with type: module

  • MCP SDK imports use explicit .js subpaths for correct runtime resolution in Node ESM

  • dev uses tsx for a simpler local ESM TypeScript workflow

  • build outputs compiled files to dist/

Reference Architecture

This repository is a leaf MCP server in a broader enterprise MCP pattern. In the target model, CoCounsel acts as the principal MCP client, determines which domain boundaries are relevant and allowed for the current user, and then engages the appropriate domain orchestration MCP servers.

flowchart TD
  U[User Request and Persona]
  U --> A[CoCounsel<br/>Principal MCP Client]

  A --> P[Persona and Policy Check]
  P --> B[HR Domain MCP Orchestration]
  P --> C[Cloud Audit Suite MCP Orchestration]

  B --> B1[Leave Management MCP]
  B --> B2[HR Query MCP]
  B --> B3[Payroll MCP]

  C --> C1[Engagement Manager MCP]
  C --> C2[Guided Assurance MCP]
  C --> C3[Other Audit Domain MCPs]

  B1 --> S1[HR or Leave Systems]
  B2 --> S2[HR Data Sources]
  B3 --> S3[Payroll Systems]

  C1 --> S4[Engagement Systems]
  C2 --> S5[Assurance Frameworks and Evidence Sources]
  C3 --> S6[Other Audit Systems]

In this model:

  • CoCounsel operates at the cross-domain layer and decides which domains should be enabled for the current request

  • domain orchestration MCP servers define domain boundaries, high-level domain skill context, and access-scoped capability exposure

  • domain orchestration MCP servers may re-expose leaf tools directly, add light curation, or add a small number of domain-native abstractions

  • leaf MCP servers encapsulate focused systems and capabilities

  • this leave management server fits under the HR domain orchestration layer

Example access model:

  • an internal HR user may be allowed to use both the HR domain orchestration MCP and the Cloud Audit Suite orchestration MCP

  • an external auditor or client may only be allowed to use the Cloud Audit Suite orchestration MCP

  • if the request does not match any enabled domain, CoCounsel can answer directly without invoking a domain MCP

Why the orchestration layer exists:

  • to establish a domain boundary rather than exposing every leaf MCP globally

  • to carry domain-level skill or semantic context that helps CoCounsel choose the correct domain

  • to enable persona-aware access control at the domain level

  • to leave room for future domain workflows without forcing them into the principal client

Example Scenarios

Employee flow

  1. Call list_all_employees

  2. Call check_leave_balance for a selected employee

  3. Call apply_leave

  4. Call list_employee_leaves to verify the request is pending

Manager flow

  1. Call list_all_managers

  2. Call list_pending_approvals for a manager

  3. Call approve_leave, partial_approve_leave, or reject_leave

  4. Call check_leave_balance again to verify the resulting balance

Limitations

  • Data is in-memory only and is reset when the server restarts

  • No persistence or database integration yet

  • No authentication or role-based access beyond seeded manager-to-employee mappings

  • Partial approvals are day-count based, not date-specific within a leave range

Scripts

Script

Description

npm run dev

Run the MCP server from TypeScript using tsx

npm run check

Run TypeScript type checking without emitting output

npm run build

Compile the server to dist/

npm start

Run the compiled server from dist/index.js

Tech Stack

  • TypeScript

  • Node.js

  • @modelcontextprotocol/sdk

  • zod

F
license - not found
-
quality - not tested
C
maintenance

Maintenance

Maintainers
Response time
Release cycle
Releases (12mo)
Commit activity

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/JayLathiaTR/mcp-leave-management'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server