MCP-PDF2MD
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@MCP-PDF2MDconvert this PDF from https://example.com/report.pdf to markdown"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
MCP-PDF2MD
MCP-PDF2MD Service
An MCP-based high-performance PDF to Markdown conversion service powered by the Mistral AI OCR API, supporting batch processing for local files and URL links with structured output.
Key Features
Format Conversion: Convert PDF files to structured Markdown format.
Multi-source Support: Process both local PDF files and remote PDF URLs.
MCP Integration: Seamlessly integrates with LLM clients like Claude Desktop.
Structure Preservation: Aims to maintain the original document structure, including headings, paragraphs, and lists.
Image Extraction: Automatically extracts images from the PDF and saves them locally.
High-Quality Extraction: Leverages Mistral AI's state-of-the-art OCR for high-quality text and layout information extraction.
Related MCP server: PDF Reader MCP Server
System Requirements
Python 3.10+
uvfor environment and package management (recommended)
Quick Start
Clone the repository and enter the directory:
git clone https://github.com/zicez/mcp-pdf2md.git cd mcp-pdf2mdInstall dependencies with uv:
uv syncConfigure environment variables:
Create a
.envfile in the project root directory and set your Mistral AI API key:MISTRAL_API_KEY=your_mistral_api_key_hereStart the service:
uv run pdf2md
Command Line Arguments
The server supports the following command line arguments:
--output-dir: Specify the directory to save converted Markdown files and images. Defaults to./downloads.
Example:
uv run pdf2md --output-dir /path/to/my/outputClaude Desktop Configuration
Add the following configuration in Claude Desktop:
Windows:
{
"mcpServers": {
"pdf2md": {
"command": "uv",
"args": [
"--directory",
"C:\\path\\to\\mcp-pdf2md",
"run",
"pdf2md",
"--output-dir",
"C:\\path\\to\\output"
],
"env": {
"MISTRAL_API_KEY": "your_mistral_api_key_here"
}
}
}
}Linux/macOS:
{
"mcpServers": {
"pdf2md": {
"command": "uv",
"args": [
"--directory",
"/path/to/mcp-pdf2md",
"run",
"pdf2md",
"--output-dir",
"/path/to/output"
],
"env": {
"MISTRAL_API_KEY": "your_mistral_api_key_here"
}
}
}
}Note about API Key Configuration: You can set the API key in two ways:
In the
.envfile within the project directory (recommended for development).In the Claude Desktop configuration as shown above (recommended for regular use).
If you set the API key in both places, the one in the Claude Desktop configuration will take precedence.
MCP Tools
The server provides the following MCP tools:
convert_pdf_url(url: str): Converts a PDF from a URL to Markdown. Supports single URLs or multiple URLs separated by spaces, commas, or newlines.convert_pdf_file(file_path: str): Converts a local PDF file to Markdown. Supports single or multiple file paths separated by spaces, commas, or newlines.
Getting a Mistral AI API Key
This project relies on the Mistral AI API for PDF content extraction. To obtain an API key:
Visit the Mistral AI Platform and create an account.
Navigate to the "API Keys" section in your workspace.
Create a new secret key.
Copy the generated API key.
Use this key as the value for
MISTRAL_API_KEY.
License
MIT License - see the LICENSE file for details.
Credits
This project uses the Mistral AI OCR API.
Available Tools
2 toolsconvert_pdf_fileA
Convert a local PDF file to Markdown. Output is saved in a new folder named after the PDF in its original directory.
Args:
file_path: Path to a local PDF file or multiple paths separated by spaces, commas, or newlines.
Returns:
A dictionary with the conversion results.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| file_path | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It describes the conversion process, output format (Markdown), and storage behavior (saved in a new folder), but doesn't mention error handling, performance characteristics, file size limits, or permission requirements. It provides basic operational context but lacks comprehensive behavioral details.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is efficiently structured with three focused sentences: purpose statement, parameter explanation, and return value description. Each sentence adds distinct value without redundancy. The information is front-loaded with the core functionality stated first.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's moderate complexity (file conversion with storage implications), no annotations, and an output schema present, the description covers the essential operations well. It explains what the tool does, parameter usage, and mentions the return format (though output schema handles details). However, it could better address error cases or limitations given the file system operations involved.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must fully compensate. It explains the 'file_path' parameter meaningfully, specifying it accepts 'a local PDF file or multiple paths separated by spaces, commas, or newlines,' which adds crucial semantic information beyond the schema's basic type declaration. However, it doesn't detail path format requirements or validation rules.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the specific action ('Convert a local PDF file to Markdown') and the resource ('PDF file'), distinguishing it from the sibling tool 'convert_pdf_url' which handles URLs rather than local files. The description explicitly mentions the output format and storage location, making the purpose unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear context for when to use this tool (for local PDF files) versus the sibling tool (for URLs), though it doesn't explicitly state 'when not to use' or mention alternative tools beyond the sibling. The guidance is sufficient to differentiate use cases but lacks explicit exclusions or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
convert_pdf_urlA
Convert a PDF from a URL to Markdown. The output is saved in the directory specified by --output-dir.
Args:
url: A single PDF URL or multiple URLs separated by spaces, commas, or newlines.
Returns:
A dictionary with the conversion results.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It discloses key behavioral traits: the conversion output is saved to a directory (--output-dir), and it handles multiple URLs. However, it misses details like error handling, rate limits, authentication needs, or file format specifics.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured and front-loaded with the core purpose, followed by specific sections for Args and Returns. Every sentence adds value without redundancy, making it efficient and easy to parse.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's moderate complexity (conversion with output handling), no annotations, and an output schema present, the description is mostly complete. It covers purpose, parameters, and output behavior, but lacks some contextual details like prerequisites or error scenarios that could enhance agent understanding.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It adds meaningful semantics: the 'url' parameter can be a single URL or multiple URLs separated by spaces, commas, or newlines, which clarifies usage beyond the basic schema. It doesn't detail URL validation or examples, keeping it from a perfect score.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose: converting PDFs from URLs to Markdown with specific output behavior. It uses precise verbs ('Convert', 'saved') and distinguishes from the sibling tool convert_pdf_file by specifying URL-based input rather than file-based input.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implicitly indicates when to use this tool (for URL-based PDF conversion) versus the sibling convert_pdf_file (for file-based conversion). However, it lacks explicit guidance on when not to use it or detailed alternatives beyond the sibling tool name.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
2 tool updates
- First observed
convert_pdf_file - First observed
convert_pdf_url
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one handles local PDF files, while the other handles PDFs from URLs. There is no overlap in functionality, and the descriptions explicitly differentiate between file-based and URL-based inputs, making misselection unlikely.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'convert_pdf_' as the prefix, followed by 'file' or 'url'. This predictable naming scheme makes it easy to understand their roles and maintain consistency across the tool set.
With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a PDF conversion domain, as it lacks operations like batch processing, configuration adjustments, or error handling tools. While the core conversion is covered, the limited scope may restrict agent workflows, placing it in the borderline range.
The server covers the basic conversion functionality for both local files and URLs, but there are notable gaps such as no tools for managing output directories, handling conversion errors, or providing status updates. This incomplete surface could lead to agent failures in more complex scenarios.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
High-fidelity PDF to structured Markdown conversion and document field extraction.
Convert PDF, DOCX, HTML, and URLs to clean, LLM-ready markdown with tables preserved
Convert documents and web pages to clean Markdown: PDF, DOCX, XLSX, EPUB, scanned files, any URL.
PDF URLs to per-page text, tables as rows, Markdown, metadata and OCR for scanned pages.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to extract and read content from PDF documents using Mistral AI's OCR capabilities. Provides intelligent caching and returns clean markdown text for easy integration with AI workflows.21MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables reading and extracting content from PDF documents including text (as Markdown), images, tables, and metadata from both local files and URLs, with OCR support for scanned documents.2-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceConverts documents (PDF, Word, PPT, images, HTML) to Markdown via MinerU API. Supports URL and local file inputs with OCR, formula/table recognition, and automatic large file handling.55MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceConverts documents and images to Markdown using Mistral AI's OCR, enabling AI-powered document processing via MCP-compatible clients like Claude Desktop.2742MIT