Skip to main content
Glama
Raoof128

gmail-mcp

by Raoof128

Gmail MCP for Claude

CI License: MIT Node

A Gmail Model Context Protocol server that moves attachments to and from your disk, works across several Google accounts, and puts every mailbox mutation behind a permission model the server enforces rather than the model.

Status: pre-release, deployed and exercised end to end. The Worker, Google OAuth, the 38 Gmail tools and the macOS companion are implemented, and a deployed Worker has completed the whole chain against a real mailbox: dynamic client registration, PKCE, a scoped token, reads, a gated send that refused until the owner approved it, and an attachment round trip to disk. That is not a release. Five external qualification gates remain not_run, release authority is unreachable by construction, and the served build identity is unqualified. See project status below, the release qualification runbook and the companion runbook.

Why this exists

Two gaps in hosted Gmail connectors show up in daily use.

The first is attachments. A connector returns an attachment's name and id but never its bytes, so you cannot save one to disk. Sending is limited to base64 inlined in the tool call, which stops being usable past a few hundred kilobytes.

The second is permission. Once you connect, a prompt-injected email or a confused model can reach every write the connector exposes. There is no middle setting between full access and none.

This project closes both, without depending on any capability of any hosted connector.

Related MCP server: gmail-mcp-server

What it does

Attachments move in both directions, and the bytes never pass through the model's context. A download becomes an opaque staging handle, and a thin local companion exchanges that handle for a file on disk. Uploads use a private snapshot and a server-approved transfer. Attachment bytes stay out of model context.

Several Google accounts sit under one owner, each with its own alias, policy and send limit. Every write names its account. The model never guesses which mailbox you meant.

Every action resolves to allow, ask or deny, and the server decides. Modifiers such as +external and +attachment describe the risk in a specific call, and they raise a built-in default. A level you save on the policy page is final. "Allow everything" there is one grant that replaces an approval per call; you can set any action back to ask or deny later.

ask means a person approves. The call creates a pending action and returns without touching Gmail. The payload is held server-side and hashed, so what you approve is what executes. You approve in your browser, or through MCP URL-mode elicitation where the client supports it. A confirmation code relayed through the model is never accepted.

Nothing can permanently delete mail. No tool exposes it, and the Google scope this server requests cannot perform one.

Design principles

Claude is not the authority. The MCP client is not the authority. Tool annotations are not the authority. The authenticated server-side policy engine is the authority.

Three consequences run through the code.

Identity is never an argument. The acting user comes from the verified bearer token, and ownership is a database foreign key rather than a habit of remembering to filter.

Approval binds to bytes. A pending action stores its canonical (RFC 8785) payload and the hash of those exact bytes. The attachments an operation reserves are read back out of the approved payload, so nobody can swap in a different file between approval and send.

Ambiguity is a state rather than a guess. When a send may have reached Gmail but the result was never recorded, the operation becomes delivery_unknown and says so. It is never retried on its own.

Architecture

Claude (claude.ai / Desktop / Claude Code)
        │  MCP over Streamable HTTP, bearer scoped "mcp"
        ▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Cloudflare Worker  (the authority)       │
│  Gmail tools · Policy engine             │
│  Confirmation engine · Operation journal │
│  Google OAuth · Attachment staging       │
│  Audit log · Approval and policy pages   │
└──────┬─────────────┬──────────────┬──────┘
       │             │              └── KV   OAuth clients and grants
       │             └── R2   attachment bytes, short lived
       └── D1   accounts, policy, approvals, operations, audit
       ▼
   Gmail API

Claude Code / Desktop only
        │  stdio
        ▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Local companion (thin)                   │
│  save_attachment · stage_file            │
│  bearer scoped "staging"                 │
└──────────────┬───────────────────────────┘
               ▼
        Your filesystem, confined to configured roots

The companion knows nothing about Gmail. It moves bytes between staging handles and disk, and enforces the filesystem rules only a process on that filesystem can enforce. Gmail never talks to it.

docs/ARCHITECTURE.md covers this properly. The full design, including the threat model and the reasoning behind each decision, is in the design spec, and docs/README.md maps the rest of the documentation and says which parts are historical.

Project status

Three words are used precisely below and are not interchangeable. Locally verified means a test proves it inside the real Workers runtime or the native suite. Live means it has additionally run against the deployed Worker and real Google infrastructure. not_run means no evidence exists, which is a status rather than a failure.

Component

State

D1 schema, ownership invariants

Locally verified

Policy engine, actions and modifiers

Locally verified

Approval engine, atomic claim

Locally verified; live, a send held until the owner approved it

Operation journal, idempotency

Locally verified

Attachment staging (server side)

Locally verified; live, a PDF staged out of Gmail and read to disk

Audit log, scheduled recovery

Locally verified

MCP endpoint and control tools

Locally verified; live, registration, PKCE and all 38 tools listed

Google OAuth and the approval pages

Locally verified against a synthetic Google; live against Google

The 38 Gmail tools and the send pipeline

Locally verified against a synthetic Gmail; live, a message sent

Local companion and native helper

Locally verified; live, a save to disk and an owner debt repair

The five external qualification gates

not_run, and none can be closed from here

Release authority

Unreachable by construction

The Worker suite runs inside workerd against real D1, R2 and KV emulation with a synthetic Google service. The native suite exercises real files and SQLite; Keychain tests use an isolated adapter.

What is not established

Five guarantees are external to this repository and remain not_run. A tested refusal path proves the system refuses without evidence; it does not produce the evidence.

Counting them is easy to get wrong, so the relationship is written out. Three open feasibility decisions are recorded in Plan 6 feasibility: the provider commit barrier, writer quiescence together with deployment exclusion, and peak isolate memory. Those three decisions cover four guarantees, because quiescence and exclusion are decided together and refused separately. Restore execution and reconciliation is the fifth, and it is not a feasibility question but a missing controller.

Gate

Why it cannot be closed from here

Peak isolate memory

128 MB is per isolate, shared and reused; sampled metrics cannot bound it

Restore execution and reconciliation

no restore controller exists, so no restore request can be issued

Authoritative writer quiescence

cancelling in-flight queries does not exclude a delayed or cross-host write

Cross-host deployment exclusion

a local lock does not exclude another laptop, CI runner or operator

Provider commit barrier

the provider does not expose whether a lost response committed

None of these may be closed with an operator boolean, an elapsed timeout, a successful request, Node RSS or a mocked receipt. The full-project gauntlet is canonical for their classification and the evidence behind it.

Two further guarantees hold by construction rather than by a check, which is stronger while it lasts and weaker the moment the code arrives. There is no restore request to be uncertain about, and release authority is unreachable because assessRelease reports release as only fail or not_run and always carries implementation_incomplete as a blocker. Both owe requalification on the day a controller appears.

The guarantees that are established, with the implementation site behind each, are in docs/INVARIANTS.md. Current test counts live in the changelog and nowhere else, so they cannot drift apart.

Getting started

Use Node 22.18 or newer for the companion. Its native helper requires macOS 26.6 or newer, Xcode command-line tools and a local APFS or HFS volume.

git clone https://github.com/Raoof128/gmail-mcp.git
cd gmail-mcp
npm install
npm run verify

npm run verify runs formatting, linting, type checking and the TypeScript suites across all four workspaces. CI runs exactly this. It does not compile or test Swift, so npm run verify:native is a separate gate that runs swift test and a release build on a supported Mac.

Running the server

Every route is behind real identity. There is no development bearer: a client obtains a token through the OAuth flow, and the browser pages need a Google login as the configured owner.

cp worker/.dev.vars.example worker/.dev.vars
npm run migrate:local --workspace worker

Create the Google OAuth client and set the owner following the Google Cloud runbook. Because the Worker builds its redirect URIs and audiences as https://<WORKER_HOSTNAME>, the OAuth flows do not complete against a plain-HTTP wrangler dev; deploy a dev Worker for manual checks. The test suite drives every flow, including the races, against an in-memory Google inside the real Workers runtime, so run the gate from the repository root:

npm run verify

Point a client at the deployed endpoint and it discovers authorization on its own:

npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector https://<WORKER_HOSTNAME>/mcp

Local companion

Set up the companion after registering its client on the Worker Accounts page. It exposes list_roots, stage_file and save_attachment, and refuses overwrites.

A save that loses the exclusive rename holds its reservation against a 25 MiB budget until the helper collects the leftover temporary. When the collector cannot verify what it would remove, that charge stays and every later save answers spool_budget. gmail-mcp-companion debt lists whatever is charged with the remedy that fits it, and debt --scope SCOPE --release HANDLE clears a charge in the one state where a human safely can. Releasing repairs accounting only: the receipt still says publication_unknown, because dropping a charge learns nothing about the destination.

Repository layout

shared/     Contracts both halves depend on: action names, error codes, zod schemas
worker/     The Cloudflare Worker: all of the authority
  src/auth/        token scope and audience, consent, companion registration
  src/crypto/      canonical JSON (RFC 8785), hashing, AES-GCM keyring
  src/policy/      recipient trust, argument limits, the policy engine
  src/approval/    pending actions and the atomic claim
  src/operations/  the external-side-effect journal, the send pipeline, recovery
  src/staging/     attachment ingest, reads, reservations and lifecycle
  src/google/      the Google OIDC client, account connect, tokens, the Gmail client
  src/tools/       the 38 tools and the one gate they all pass through
  src/mime/        RFC 2047 and 2231 encoding, the message as a stream
  src/web/         the owner console: accounts, policy, audit, approval, login
  src/mcp/         the MCP server and the control tools
  migrations/      D1 schema, append-only
companion/  TypeScript stdio client
  native/          the Swift helper: Darwin filesystem calls, SQLite, Keychain
scripts/    qualification: build identity, evidence graph, release assessment
docs/       Architecture, the invariant index, runbooks, the design spec, and the development record

docs/README.md is the map: which documents describe the system now, and which are dated records of what was true when they were written.

Security

SECURITY.md has the threat model, the boundary of what this does not defend against, and how to report a vulnerability. Please do not open a public issue for a security report.

Contributing

CONTRIBUTING.md covers the development loop, how this project tests, and what makes a change easy to review. The Code of Conduct governs participation.

License

MIT.

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A production-ready MCP server that connects Claude AI to Gmail, enabling full email management through natural language.
    111 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A custom MCP server that gives Claude full Gmail control — send directly, read, reply, search, label, and delete emails.
    111 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    A local MCP server that gives Claude access to multiple Gmail accounts simultaneously for search, read, draft, send, label, and a scheduled cross-inbox digest, with enforced send policies per mailbox.
    MIT