gmail-mcp
Provides Gmail integration for sending and receiving email with attachment staging, support for multiple Google accounts, and server-enforced permission controls on mailbox mutations.
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@gmail-mcpSave the attachment from the latest email to my Desktop."
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Gmail MCP for Claude
A Gmail Model Context Protocol server that moves attachments to and from your disk, works across several Google accounts, and puts every mailbox mutation behind a permission model the server enforces rather than the model.
Status: pre-release, deployed and exercised end to end. The Worker, Google OAuth, the 38 Gmail tools and the macOS companion are implemented, and a deployed Worker has completed the whole chain against a real mailbox: dynamic client registration, PKCE, a scoped token, reads, a gated send that refused until the owner approved it, and an attachment round trip to disk. That is not a release. Five external qualification gates remain
not_run, release authority is unreachable by construction, and the served build identity isunqualified. See project status below, the release qualification runbook and the companion runbook.
Why this exists
Two gaps in hosted Gmail connectors show up in daily use.
The first is attachments. A connector returns an attachment's name and id but never its bytes, so you cannot save one to disk. Sending is limited to base64 inlined in the tool call, which stops being usable past a few hundred kilobytes.
The second is permission. Once you connect, a prompt-injected email or a confused model can reach every write the connector exposes. There is no middle setting between full access and none.
This project closes both, without depending on any capability of any hosted connector.
Related MCP server: gmail-mcp-server
What it does
Attachments move in both directions, and the bytes never pass through the model's context. A download becomes an opaque staging handle, and a thin local companion exchanges that handle for a file on disk. Uploads use a private snapshot and a server-approved transfer. Attachment bytes stay out of model context.
Several Google accounts sit under one owner, each with its own alias, policy and send limit. Every write names its account. The model never guesses which mailbox you meant.
Every action resolves to allow, ask or deny, and the server decides. Modifiers such as +external
and +attachment describe the risk in a specific call, and they raise a built-in default. A level you
save on the policy page is final. "Allow everything" there is one grant that replaces an approval per
call; you can set any action back to ask or deny later.
ask means a person approves. The call creates a pending action and returns without touching Gmail. The
payload is held server-side and hashed, so what you approve is what executes. You approve in your browser,
or through MCP URL-mode elicitation where the client supports it. A confirmation code relayed through the
model is never accepted.
Nothing can permanently delete mail. No tool exposes it, and the Google scope this server requests cannot perform one.
Design principles
Claude is not the authority. The MCP client is not the authority. Tool annotations are not the authority. The authenticated server-side policy engine is the authority.
Three consequences run through the code.
Identity is never an argument. The acting user comes from the verified bearer token, and ownership is a database foreign key rather than a habit of remembering to filter.
Approval binds to bytes. A pending action stores its canonical (RFC 8785) payload and the hash of those exact bytes. The attachments an operation reserves are read back out of the approved payload, so nobody can swap in a different file between approval and send.
Ambiguity is a state rather than a guess. When a send may have reached Gmail but the result was never
recorded, the operation becomes delivery_unknown and says so. It is never retried on its own.
Architecture
Claude (claude.ai / Desktop / Claude Code)
│ MCP over Streamable HTTP, bearer scoped "mcp"
▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Cloudflare Worker (the authority) │
│ Gmail tools · Policy engine │
│ Confirmation engine · Operation journal │
│ Google OAuth · Attachment staging │
│ Audit log · Approval and policy pages │
└──────┬─────────────┬──────────────┬──────┘
│ │ └── KV OAuth clients and grants
│ └── R2 attachment bytes, short lived
└── D1 accounts, policy, approvals, operations, audit
▼
Gmail API
Claude Code / Desktop only
│ stdio
▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Local companion (thin) │
│ save_attachment · stage_file │
│ bearer scoped "staging" │
└──────────────┬───────────────────────────┘
▼
Your filesystem, confined to configured rootsThe companion knows nothing about Gmail. It moves bytes between staging handles and disk, and enforces the filesystem rules only a process on that filesystem can enforce. Gmail never talks to it.
docs/ARCHITECTURE.md covers this properly. The full design, including the threat model and the reasoning behind each decision, is in the design spec, and docs/README.md maps the rest of the documentation and says which parts are historical.
Project status
Three words are used precisely below and are not interchangeable. Locally verified means a test
proves it inside the real Workers runtime or the native suite. Live means it has additionally run
against the deployed Worker and real Google infrastructure. not_run means no evidence exists, which
is a status rather than a failure.
Component | State |
D1 schema, ownership invariants | Locally verified |
Policy engine, actions and modifiers | Locally verified |
Approval engine, atomic claim | Locally verified; live, a send held until the owner approved it |
Operation journal, idempotency | Locally verified |
Attachment staging (server side) | Locally verified; live, a PDF staged out of Gmail and read to disk |
Audit log, scheduled recovery | Locally verified |
MCP endpoint and control tools | Locally verified; live, registration, PKCE and all 38 tools listed |
Google OAuth and the approval pages | Locally verified against a synthetic Google; live against Google |
The 38 Gmail tools and the send pipeline | Locally verified against a synthetic Gmail; live, a message sent |
Local companion and native helper | Locally verified; live, a save to disk and an owner debt repair |
The five external qualification gates |
|
Release authority | Unreachable by construction |
The Worker suite runs inside workerd against real D1, R2 and KV emulation with a synthetic Google service. The native suite exercises real files and SQLite; Keychain tests use an isolated adapter.
What is not established
Five guarantees are external to this repository and remain not_run. A tested refusal path proves the
system refuses without evidence; it does not produce the evidence.
Counting them is easy to get wrong, so the relationship is written out. Three open feasibility decisions are recorded in Plan 6 feasibility: the provider commit barrier, writer quiescence together with deployment exclusion, and peak isolate memory. Those three decisions cover four guarantees, because quiescence and exclusion are decided together and refused separately. Restore execution and reconciliation is the fifth, and it is not a feasibility question but a missing controller.
Gate | Why it cannot be closed from here |
Peak isolate memory | 128 MB is per isolate, shared and reused; sampled metrics cannot bound it |
Restore execution and reconciliation | no restore controller exists, so no restore request can be issued |
Authoritative writer quiescence | cancelling in-flight queries does not exclude a delayed or cross-host write |
Cross-host deployment exclusion | a local lock does not exclude another laptop, CI runner or operator |
Provider commit barrier | the provider does not expose whether a lost response committed |
None of these may be closed with an operator boolean, an elapsed timeout, a successful request, Node RSS or a mocked receipt. The full-project gauntlet is canonical for their classification and the evidence behind it.
Two further guarantees hold by construction rather than by a check, which is stronger while it lasts
and weaker the moment the code arrives. There is no restore request to be uncertain about, and release
authority is unreachable because assessRelease reports release as only fail or not_run and always
carries implementation_incomplete as a blocker. Both owe requalification on the day a controller appears.
The guarantees that are established, with the implementation site behind each, are in docs/INVARIANTS.md. Current test counts live in the changelog and nowhere else, so they cannot drift apart.
Getting started
Use Node 22.18 or newer for the companion. Its native helper requires macOS 26.6 or newer, Xcode command-line tools and a local APFS or HFS volume.
git clone https://github.com/Raoof128/gmail-mcp.git
cd gmail-mcp
npm install
npm run verifynpm run verify runs formatting, linting, type checking and the TypeScript suites across all four
workspaces. CI runs exactly this. It does not compile or test Swift, so npm run verify:native is a
separate gate that runs swift test and a release build on a supported Mac.
Running the server
Every route is behind real identity. There is no development bearer: a client obtains a token through the OAuth flow, and the browser pages need a Google login as the configured owner.
cp worker/.dev.vars.example worker/.dev.vars
npm run migrate:local --workspace workerCreate the Google OAuth client and set the owner following
the Google Cloud runbook. Because the Worker builds its redirect URIs and
audiences as https://<WORKER_HOSTNAME>, the OAuth flows do not complete against a plain-HTTP
wrangler dev; deploy a dev Worker for manual checks. The test suite drives every flow, including the
races, against an in-memory Google inside the real Workers runtime, so run the gate from the repository
root:
npm run verifyPoint a client at the deployed endpoint and it discovers authorization on its own:
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector https://<WORKER_HOSTNAME>/mcpLocal companion
Set up the companion after registering its client on the Worker Accounts
page. It exposes list_roots, stage_file and save_attachment, and refuses overwrites.
A save that loses the exclusive rename holds its reservation against a 25 MiB budget until the helper
collects the leftover temporary. When the collector cannot verify what it would remove, that charge stays
and every later save answers spool_budget. gmail-mcp-companion debt lists whatever is charged with
the remedy that fits it, and debt --scope SCOPE --release HANDLE clears a charge in the one state where
a human safely can. Releasing repairs accounting only: the receipt still says publication_unknown,
because dropping a charge learns nothing about the destination.
Repository layout
shared/ Contracts both halves depend on: action names, error codes, zod schemas
worker/ The Cloudflare Worker: all of the authority
src/auth/ token scope and audience, consent, companion registration
src/crypto/ canonical JSON (RFC 8785), hashing, AES-GCM keyring
src/policy/ recipient trust, argument limits, the policy engine
src/approval/ pending actions and the atomic claim
src/operations/ the external-side-effect journal, the send pipeline, recovery
src/staging/ attachment ingest, reads, reservations and lifecycle
src/google/ the Google OIDC client, account connect, tokens, the Gmail client
src/tools/ the 38 tools and the one gate they all pass through
src/mime/ RFC 2047 and 2231 encoding, the message as a stream
src/web/ the owner console: accounts, policy, audit, approval, login
src/mcp/ the MCP server and the control tools
migrations/ D1 schema, append-only
companion/ TypeScript stdio client
native/ the Swift helper: Darwin filesystem calls, SQLite, Keychain
scripts/ qualification: build identity, evidence graph, release assessment
docs/ Architecture, the invariant index, runbooks, the design spec, and the development recorddocs/README.md is the map: which documents describe the system now, and which are dated records of what was true when they were written.
Security
SECURITY.md has the threat model, the boundary of what this does not defend against, and how to report a vulnerability. Please do not open a public issue for a security report.
Contributing
CONTRIBUTING.md covers the development loop, how this project tests, and what makes a change easy to review. The Code of Conduct governs participation.
License
MIT.
This server cannot be deployed
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Email infrastructure for AI agents — send, receive, search, and reply to email over MCP.
MCP server connecting AI agents to 100+ apps (Gmail, Slack, Notion, GitHub) via one-click OAuth.
Email inboxes for AI agents: send, receive, reply, search, and manage threaded email over MCP.
Programmable email inbox for AI agents — JMAP, PoW auth, stdio MCP server.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Gmail MCP server that enables Claude to send, search, and read emails using either Gmail API or SMTP/IMAP backend.340 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA production-ready MCP server that connects Claude AI to Gmail, enabling full email management through natural language.111 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA custom MCP server that gives Claude full Gmail control — send directly, read, reply, search, label, and delete emails.111 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA local MCP server that gives Claude access to multiple Gmail accounts simultaneously for search, read, draft, send, label, and a scheduled cross-inbox digest, with enforced send policies per mailbox.MIT