Skip to main content
Glama

Domotz MCP Server

License Node.js

A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Domotz network monitoring and management. Enables AI assistants to monitor network devices, view alerts, check device status, and manage network infrastructure.

This is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that connects Claude (or any MCP-compatible AI) to your Domotz environment.

Part of the MSP Claude Plugins ecosystem — a growing suite of AI integrations for the MSP stack. Built by MSPs, for MSPs.

Installation

npm install @wyre-ai/domotz-mcp

Related MCP server: network-mcp-server

Configuration

Set the following environment variables:

Variable

Required

Description

DOMOTZ_API_KEY

Yes

Your Domotz API key

DOMOTZ_REGION

No

API region: us or eu (default: us)

MCP_TRANSPORT

No

Transport mode: stdio (default) or http

Usage

Running with Claude Desktop

Add to your Claude Desktop claude_desktop_config.json:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "domotz-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["@wyre-ai/domotz-mcp"],
      "env": {
        "DOMOTZ_API_KEY": "your-domotz-api-key"
      }
    }
  }
}

Running with Claude Code (CLI)

claude mcp add domotz-mcp \
  -e DOMOTZ_API_KEY=your-value \
  -- npx -y @wyre-ai/domotz-mcp

Docker

docker build -t domotz-mcp .
docker run \
  -e DOMOTZ_API_KEY=your-value \
  -p 8080:8080 domotz-mcp

Available Domains

Agents

Manage Domotz monitoring agents

Alerts

View and manage network alerts

Devices

Device discovery and status monitoring

Metrics

Network performance metrics

Network

Network topology and configuration

Power

Power management for managed devices

Development

# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/WYRE-AI/domotz-mcp.git
cd domotz-mcp

# Install dependencies
npm install

# Build
npm run build

# Run tests
npm test

Contributing

Contributions are welcome! Please see CONTRIBUTING.md if present, or open an issue to discuss changes.

License

Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. See LICENSE for details.

Available Tools

2 tools
domotz_navigateA

Navigate to a domain to access Domotz tools. Domains: agents (collectors/sites), devices (network devices), metrics (SNMP/variables), network (topology/interfaces), alerts (alert profiles), power (PDU/outlets).

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
domainYesThe domain to navigate to

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must bear full burden. It only says 'navigate to a domain to access tools' without disclosing behavioral traits like side effects, authentication needs, or what happens after navigation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences: first states purpose, second lists domains. No wasted words, front-loaded with key information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given only one parameter with full schema coverage and no output schema, the description provides sufficient context for a navigation tool. Could mention expected return or effect, but minimalism is acceptable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 100% coverage with an enum and description. The description adds value by mapping each domain to underlying tools (e.g., 'agents (collectors/sites)'), providing context beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Navigate to a domain to access Domotz tools' with a specific verb and resource, and lists all possible domains, distinguishing it from the sibling tool 'domotz_status' which likely checks status.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage (when you want to access a specific domain) but does not explicitly state when to use it vs. the sibling tool or any exclusions/alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

domotz_statusA

Check Domotz API connection status and available domains.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No parameters

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It indicates a read-only check operation, which is appropriate, but lacks details on backend calls, authentication, or performance implications.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no extraneous words. Perfectly concise for a simple tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a parameterless tool with no output schema, the description covers the essential purpose. However, it omits details about the response format or what 'available domains' means, which could be slightly improved.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, so the description adds no parameter meaning. Baseline is 4 because no parameter documentation is needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Check') and clearly specifies the resource ('Domotz API connection status and available domains'). It distinguishes itself from the sibling 'domotz_navigate' tool by focusing on status rather than navigation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when needing to verify connectivity or list domains, but provides no explicit guidance on when to avoid this tool or compare with siblings like 'domotz_navigate'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. 2 tool updatesv1.0.4
    • First observeddomotz_navigate
    • First observeddomotz_status

TDQS

A3.8/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation5/5

The two tools have completely distinct purposes: one navigates to various domains, the other checks API status. No overlap or ambiguity.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tools follow the same 'domotz_verb' pattern with simple, clear verbs: 'navigate' and 'status'. Consistent and predictable.

Tool Count2/5

With only 2 tools covering a wide range of domains (agents, devices, metrics, network, alerts, power), the tool surface is too thin for the apparent scope. Likely requires heavy parameterization in a single tool.

Completeness2/5

The server only provides navigation to domains and status check, but no actual CRUD or action tools for those domains. This is severely incomplete for practical management tasks.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • F
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    An MCP server that connects AI assistants to the NinjaOne remote monitoring and management platform via the REST API v2. It provides tools for device inventory, organization management, alert handling, maintenance scheduling, and automated job execution.
    22
    1
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server for network operations that lets AI assistants interact with Cisco/Juniper network devices through safe, well-defined tools like compliance audits and configuration backups.
    MIT