Echo RunPod
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Echo RunPod list my active RunPod pods"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Echo RunPod
Governed RunPod control plane for ECHO OMEGA PRIME. Version 1.1.1.
One canonical policy source. Thin entry points for Grok, Codex, Echo agents, and ChatGPT-via-Nexus.
Default
Observe and prepare. Do not spend unless the Commander approved a manifest or a bounded full lane is in force. Echo Nexus mutations require confirm: EXECUTE.
Related MCP server: gov-mcp
ChatGPT / MCP
Dedicated resource (do not request echo.write):
live scopes:
echo.searchecho.fetchecho.invoke.readecho.sdk.invokenever:
echo.write,echo.read,echo.runpod.*secret:
vault://runpod/api-keythenRUNPOD_API_KEY
echo.sdk.invoke keeps mutation tools mutating (readOnlyHint: false). They still require confirm: EXECUTE plus an approved manifest or bounded full lane.
Install
See skills/echo-runpod/references/install-verify.md.
Test
PYTHONPATH=. python -m unittest discover -s tests -vUpstream
runpod/runpod-plugins-official v1.1.2
b669407688056642d09d2049df5432cb78ae33f0runpod/runpod-mcp
51d6fd9a0ff16a4eeb7d508972aeb5502f514939
Secrets
vault://runpod/api-key then RUNPOD_API_KEY. Never commit keys.
Available Tools
4 toolsinvoke_sdk_capEcho SDK InvokeADestructive
Invoke an Echo SDK capability by exact capability ID with params. Risky caps require confirm='SDK_INVOKE_APPROVED' unless ECHO_MCP_ALLOW_RISKY_SDK=1. Supports idempotency_key + gate retry/backoff.
Inputs: capability (required), params, reason, confirm, +2 more. Returns: object
readEcho ReadCRead-only
Read a local file/directory or read one exact SDK capability record (includes registration_state).
Inputs: id, path, target, max_bytes, +1 more. Returns: object
searchEcho SearchARead-only
Search local files/directories and/or Echo SDK capability registry (mcp__claude_ai_EchoOmegaPrime__search). target=files|sdk_caps|both. For red/unregistered grounding: target=sdk_caps, query='red unregistered', optional health=red|unknown|unregistered, check_ids for exact registration probes.
Inputs: query (required), root, health, target, +5 more. Returns: object
writeEcho WriteADestructive
Write or append UTF-8 text to a local file path. Idempotent via idempotency_key (or content-hash for overwrite). No delete operation is exposed.
Inputs: path (required), content (required), mode, create_dirs, +1 more. Returns: object
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Loading tool schema changelog…
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
search (query-based discovery) vs read (fetch an exact path/ID) vs write vs invoke_sdk_cap are largely distinct actions, and descriptions clarify the file-vs-SDK-capability duality. However, search and read both span files and SDK capabilities, creating mild overlap an agent could occasionally confuse when deciding whether to look up or fetch a record.
Three tools use terse single verbs (search, read, write) while one uses a fuller verb_noun form (invoke_sdk_cap); all are lowercase snake_case and verb-first. The pattern is readable and mostly consistent, with the one longer name being the only deviation.
Four tools is compact but each earns its place: discovery, read, write, and remote capability invocation cover the core surface of a file+SDK server. It is on the thin side but defensible for the focused scope.
The set exposes read, write/append (idempotent overwrite), search, and SDK invocation, but no delete or directory/list mutation is offered despite the file-oriented surface. Missing delete and any explicit listing/management operation is a notable gap agents will hit when housekeeping files.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Control plane for autonomous software labor. Agents claim objectives over MCP with audit trail.
Governed MCP: agent audit, provenance, deterministic checks, and receipt-backed FragGate execution.
MCP-first control plane for ProAgentStore agents and private instances.
Hosted MCP memory and agent control plane for durable conversations, jobs, and operations.
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceGovernance/control plane for MCP-enabled coding-agent workflows with validation, findings, approvals, budgets, and proof bundles.5511-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enforces runtime governance on AI agent actions — file access, command execution, delegation chains, and permission escalation.MIT

Infraveil MCP serverofficial
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA hardened, self-hosted MCP server that lets AI agents query and govern an Infraveil control plane in-loop, reading state and filing deploy/remediation requests that require human approval.7AGPL 3.0- FlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceDeterministic MCP control plane for native Codex subagents, providing durable state, policy gates, budgets, artifacts, evidence workflow, and recovery for Sol/Terra/Luna hierarchical agent threads.241-