session-watcher
This server manages the lifecycle of the Session Watcher dashboard server.
start_watcher: Start (or reuse) the dashboard server and get its URL. It never returns metric values.
stop_watcher: Stop the managed dashboard server.
watcher_status: Check whether the server is running and get its URL.
Adapter-ready integration for Hermes coding agent (pending implementation) to monitor session transcripts and provide restart recommendations.
Session Watcher
LLM context economics, in your terminal.
Session Watcher treats your prompt cache as inventory — it uses EOQ theory to measure whether the current context is still worth carrying, tracking restart pressure so you can decide when to hand off.
What it does
Session Watcher reads your Claude Code transcript in real time and answers one question: is this session still worth carrying?
Most context tools optimize how you consume tokens — Headroom compresses, /compact shrinks, RTK filters. Session Watcher tracks when the cost curve is drifting, giving you the data to decide. They compose: run any pruning strategy you like, SW measures the cost curve so you can decide when to hand off.
SW reads from the transcript, never writes to it. The dashboard and statusline are pure observers; MCP tools return data for you to act on.
Related MCP server: ctxray
How it works
Your coding agent (Claude Code)
│ writes session transcript
▼
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Session Watcher (in-process MCP server) │
│ ─────────────────────────────────────────────────── │
│ harness/claude-code — read rows, emit observations │
│ measurement/engine — B (context belief), epochs │
│ session-watcher — apply frames, run operations │
│ rate-lamp — rent ledger + wallet clock │
│ server.js — Express + SSE dashboard │
│ statusline — one-line shell client │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│ dashboard · statusline · MCP
▼
Your browser / terminal status barThe harness layer is the only part that knows Claude Code: it reads transcript rows, decides the active branch, and emits normalized observations. Everything below it — measurement, dialogue history, handoff — consumes those observations and carries no transcript format, no row shape, and no tool name of any particular agent.
Core model: L = cache_read_input_tokens — the context stock you are renting. B is the rebuild baseline: the session's overhead floor plus the tokens of every file, skill and tool it has pulled in, which is what a restart would have to re-read. g is the growth no path accounts for, a smoothed ΔtotalStock − ΔB. x = L / B is the raw position ratio; the authoritative position is u, which every call advances by its own fraction of the restart interval that held while it ran, so the position records the path travelled rather than a ratio of today's numbers, and each landmark on the x axis is read off the reference skeleton fitted across that path. br = mf × pp is the bill premium — how much you are overpaying relative to ideal restart timing. The restart reminder is separate: it reads the rent the ledger has accumulated, so no revision of the position can withdraw one.
Lamp thresholds are the named constants BR_AMBER and BR_RED in lib/bill-regret.js: below the amber one the lamp is green, between them amber, at or above the red one red. See the paper for the full derivation — EOQ inventory theory mapped to LLM prompt caching.
Quick Start
Requires Node.js ≥ 22.16.
# Try without installing — self-contained demo
npx -y @nomadop/session-watcher demo
# Replay your own transcript
npx -y @nomadop/session-watcher replay ~/.claude/projects/<project>/<session>.jsonlOpens a browser dashboard. The demo uses a pre-built anonymized session; replay uses your real transcript. Both are read-only — nothing is modified or uploaded.
Install
Plugin (recommended)
# 1. Add the marketplace (one-time)
claude plugin marketplace add nomadop/session-watcher
# 2. Install the plugin
claude plugin install session-watcher@session-watcherOr from within a Claude Code session:
/plugin marketplace add nomadop/session-watcher
/plugin install session-watcher@session-watcher
/reload-pluginsThis registers:
MCP tools — available in every session
SessionStart hook — points the running watcher at a new session and announces pending handoffs
If you installed or updated in an already-running session, run /reload-plugins to activate.
DSH plugin
@nomadop/session-watcher-dsh runs Session Watcher inside DeepSeek Harness (DSH). It watches every running session of the host it loads into and shares ~/.session-watcher with the Claude Code plugin.
dsh plugin --profile <name> add @nomadop/session-watcher-dshThe Session Watcher tab — a view in the conversation view strip that mounts the dashboard's elements for that session.
The composer dock — a pill below the composer showing the lamp, the bill premium and the alert clock, with the position and the context stock in its popover.
Tools — the MCP tools, each answering for the calling agent's own session, except that
watcher_statuscan name another.Skills —
sw-handoff,sw-loadandsw-explain, registered with the host.Handoff across sessions — an agent that starts or resumes gets a message listing the pending handoffs other sessions prepared for its project.
Replay —
npx -y @nomadop/session-watcher replay <path>plays a DSH session log back on the dashboard.
See the DSH plugin docs for the profile to add it to, what the tab and the dock show, the surface they are supported on, and handoffs that cross between the two hosts.
Statusline
The plugin system does not yet support declaring a statusline. Add to your ~/.claude/settings.json:
{
"statusLine": {
"type": "command",
"command": "<plugin-install-path>/dist/statusline.js"
}
}Find your plugin path with:
find ~/.claude/plugins/cache -path '*/session-watcher/*/dist/statusline.js' -printOr check via claude plugin details session-watcher@session-watcher.
Note: the plugin cache path changes on version update. After updating, re-run the command above and update your statusline path.
One compact line:
Context Buckets
The bucket panel shows exactly which files, skills, and tools are consuming your context budget. Each path carries a token count — check or uncheck to preview how the restart cost changes. The U-curve ghost line updates in real time as you toggle.
Handoff
When it's time to restart, handoff preserves the state you want to keep. Run /sw-handoff to prepare a package — selected paths, working summary, next task. Then /clear, and in the fresh session run /sw-load to restore. Only what you chose is rebuilt — less ramp-up, less waste.
MCP Tools
Both plugins register the same tools, except for rotate_session, which only Claude Code registers. The Guarantees page tables them once, with where the two hosts differ.
Agent support
Session Watcher is agent-agnostic. Everything below the harness layer consumes normalized observations, so it never learns which agent produced the session.
Agent | Driver | Status |
Claude Code | JSONL tail (native) | ✅ |
DSH (DeepSeek Harness) | session event log (native) | harness ✅ · plugin ✅ |
OpenCode | adapter-ready | pending |
OpenClaw | adapter-ready | pending |
Hermes | adapter-ready | pending |
Aider | adapter-ready | pending |
Adding a new agent means writing a harness for it under lib/harness/<agent>/: a source driver that turns that agent's own session evidence into normalized observations, a thin measurement projection adapter over the shared lib/measurement-projection.js with the interpreters for the agent's native tools, the dialogue source and history turn rules that read its conversation, and the recovery sentences that tell a reader how to open a turn it cites. The engine, dialogue history, handoff, and every product surface are shared and need no change. See lib/harness/claude-code/ for the reference harness and lib/harness/dsh/ for a second one. PRs welcome.
Paper
Context Is Inventory: A Rent-or-Buy Model for Prompt-Cached LLM Sessions Longju Cheng (2026) · DOI:
10.5281/zenodo.21236704
The paper derives the full theoretical specification: EOQ→LLM mapping, the 41.4% movable-cost bound, the ski-rental restart strategy, and measurements on 1,016 real session transcripts. Read it at the DOI above.
Uninstall
claude plugin uninstall session-watcher@session-watcher
# Remove state directory (optional):
rm -rf ~/.session-watcherTest
npm test # unit + integration (node:test)
npx playwright test # E2E (requires running server)Citation
@unpublished{cheng2026context,
author = {Longju Cheng},
title = {Context Is Inventory: A Rent-or-Buy Model for Prompt-Cached LLM Sessions},
year = 2026,
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.21236704},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21236704},
note = {Preprint}
}Privacy
No remote telemetry.
Transcripts are read locally and never uploaded.
Local aggregate usage and handoff records are stored under
~/.session-watcher.No transcript prose or file contents are stored in telemetry.
Removing
~/.session-watcherdeletes all local state, except the Turn Notes a DSH session prepared and has not yet submitted successfully, which sit under the system temp directory.
License
MIT
Available Tools
3 toolsstart_watcherARead-only
Start (or reuse) the Session Watcher dashboard server; returns its URL. Never returns metric values.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The annotation readOnlyHint: true suggests no state mutation, but the description says 'start' which implies a side effect (launching a server). This contradiction lowers transparency. The description does add that it never returns metric values, but does not explain reuse behavior or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise and front-loaded, using a single sentence to convey all essential information with no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given zero parameters, no output schema, and only readOnlyHint annotation, the description is mostly complete: it states the return (URL) and what it does not return (metric values). However, it omits details on reuse behavior and whether starting creates a new process or reuses an existing one, leaving minor ambiguity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100%. The description provides no parameter details, which is acceptable as there are none. Baseline for 0 parameters is 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool starts or reuses a Session Watcher dashboard server and returns its URL, explicitly noting it never returns metric values. This differentiates from siblings like stop_watcher and watcher_status, which are distinct actions.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage to obtain the watcher URL but lacks explicit guidance on when to use versus stop_watcher or watcher_status, nor does it mention prerequisites or context. Usage is implied rather than clearly directed.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
stop_watcherBRead-only
Stop the managed Session Watcher server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Description claims 'Stop' (a mutation) while annotations set readOnlyHint=true, a direct contradiction. No additional behavioral traits disclosed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded, no redundant information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Missing details on behavior (e.g., confirmation, return value, side effects). The contradiction further reduces completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so schema covers everything. Description adds no extra meaning, which is acceptable; baseline for 0 parameters is 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'Stop' and the resource 'managed Session Watcher server', distinguishing it from siblings 'start_watcher' and 'watcher_status'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives; lacks context such as prerequisites or dependencies.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
watcher_statusARead-only
Report whether the Session Watcher server is running and its URL.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint: true, so the description adds value by specifying the output (status and URL) but does not disclose additional behavioral traits beyond that.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no extraneous words, front-loaded with the key action and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is simple with no parameters or output schema. The description fully covers its purpose and output, and sibling tools provide operational context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100%. The description needs no parameter explanation, achieving baseline for zero-parameter tools.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool reports whether the Session Watcher server is running and its URL, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools (start/stop) by focusing on status.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for checking server status, and siblings provide context for start/stop operations. However, it lacks explicit when-not or alternative guidance.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
3 tool updates
v0.3.0- First observed
start_watcher - First observed
stop_watcher - First observed
watcher_status
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a distinct purpose: starting, stopping, or checking status of the watcher server. No overlap or ambiguity.
All names use snake_case and follow a verb_noun or noun_noun pattern consistently, though 'watcher_status' is a noun phrase while the others are imperative verbs.
Three tools is within the typical 3-15 range and perfectly scoped for the server's purpose of managing a session watcher dashboard.
The tool set covers the full lifecycle of the watcher server: start, stop, and status check. No obvious gaps for the stated purpose.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Shared memory for coding agents. Stop re-explaining your codebase every session.
Adaptive plan/build/review cycles for AI coding assistants, persisted across sessions.
Shared memory across AI dev tools: each session hands its context to the next, not starting cold.
Memory for coding agents: the decisions, the dead ends, and where the last session stopped.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceStructured session journals for AI agents. Persistent memory across sessions -- no more repeating dead ends.836 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceContext intelligence for AI coding sessions. 7 MCP tools to score, compare, compress, build, and scan prompts across 9 AI tools. Rule-based, <5ms/prompt, all analysis runs locally.47MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenancePersistent memory and session intelligence for AI coding assistants. Auto-tracks mistakes, decisions, and context via hooks. Mines your full session history for patterns, predictions, and cross-session search.2116MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceNever start from zero. Persistent session intelligence for AI coding assistants.57 npm1MIT