ToGMAL MCP Server
Enables crowdsourced evidence collection for improving LLM limitation detection through taxonomy building and community-contributed examples of problematic AI behaviors
Uses Pydantic for data validation and structured analysis of LLM prompts and responses in the taxonomy system
Built as a Python-based MCP server that analyzes LLM interactions for safety issues and maintains a taxonomy of generative model limitations
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@ToGMAL MCP Serveranalyze this response for medical advice issues"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
ToGMAL MCP Server
Taxonomy of Generative Model Apparent Limitations
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides real-time, privacy-preserving analysis of LLM interactions to detect out-of-distribution behaviors and recommend safety interventions.
Overview
ToGMAL helps prevent common LLM pitfalls by detecting:
🔬 Math/Physics Speculation: Ungrounded "theories of everything" and invented physics
🏥 Medical Advice Issues: Health recommendations without proper sources or disclaimers
💾 Dangerous File Operations: Mass deletions, recursive operations without safeguards
💻 Vibe Coding Overreach: Overly ambitious projects without proper scoping
📊 Unsupported Claims: Strong assertions without evidence or hedging
Related MCP server: ChuangSi AI Model Content Protection
Key Features
Privacy-Preserving: All analysis is deterministic and local (no external API calls)
Low Latency: Heuristic-based detection for real-time analysis
Intervention Recommendations: Suggests step breakdown, human-in-the-loop, or web search
Taxonomy Building: Crowdsourced evidence collection for improving detection
Extensible: Easy to add new detection patterns and categories
Installation
Prerequisites
Python 3.10 or higher
pip package manager
Install Dependencies
pip install mcp pydantic httpx --break-system-packagesInstall the Server
# Clone or download the server
# Then run it directly
python togmal_mcp.pyUsage
Available Tools
1. togmal_analyze_prompt
Analyze a user prompt before the LLM processes it.
Parameters:
prompt(str): The user prompt to analyzeresponse_format(str): Output format -"markdown"or"json"
Example:
{
"prompt": "Build me a complete theory of quantum gravity that unifies all forces",
"response_format": "json"
}Use Cases:
Detect speculative physics theories before generating responses
Flag overly ambitious coding requests
Identify requests for medical advice that need disclaimers
2. togmal_analyze_response
Analyze an LLM response for potential issues.
Parameters:
response(str): The LLM response to analyzecontext(str, optional): Original prompt for better analysisresponse_format(str): Output format -"json"or"json"
Example:
{
"response": "You should definitely take 500mg of ibuprofen every 4 hours...",
"context": "I have a headache",
"response_format": "json"
}Use Cases:
Check for ungrounded medical advice
Detect dangerous file operation instructions
Flag unsupported statistical claims
3. togmal_submit_evidence
Submit evidence of LLM limitations to improve the taxonomy.
Parameters:
category(str): Type of limitation -"math_physics_speculation","ungrounded_medical_advice", etc.prompt(str): The prompt that triggered the issueresponse(str): The problematic responsedescription(str): Why this is problematicseverity(str): Severity level -"low","moderate","high", or"critical"
Example:
{
"category": "ungrounded_medical_advice",
"prompt": "What should I do about chest pain?",
"response": "It's probably nothing serious, just indigestion...",
"description": "Dismissed potentially serious symptom without recommending medical consultation",
"severity": "high"
}Features:
Human-in-the-loop confirmation before submission
Generates unique entry ID for tracking
Contributes to improving detection heuristics
4. togmal_get_taxonomy
Retrieve entries from the taxonomy database.
Parameters:
category(str, optional): Filter by categorymin_severity(str, optional): Minimum severity to includelimit(int): Maximum entries to return (1-100, default 20)offset(int): Pagination offset (default 0)response_format(str): Output format
Example:
{
"category": "dangerous_file_operations",
"min_severity": "high",
"limit": 10,
"offset": 0,
"response_format": "json"
}Use Cases:
Research common LLM failure patterns
Train improved detection models
Generate safety guidelines
5. togmal_get_statistics
Get statistical overview of the taxonomy database.
Parameters:
response_format(str): Output format
Returns:
Total entries by category
Severity distribution
Database capacity status
Detection Heuristics
Math/Physics Speculation
Detects:
"Theory of everything" claims
Unified field theory proposals
Invented equations or particles
Modifications to fundamental constants
Patterns:
- "new equation for quantum gravity"
- "my unified theory"
- "discovered particle"
- "redefine the speed of light"Ungrounded Medical Advice
Detects:
Diagnoses without qualifications
Treatment recommendations without sources
Specific drug dosages
Dismissive responses to symptoms
Patterns:
- "you probably have..."
- "take 500mg of..."
- "don't worry about it"
- Missing citations or disclaimersDangerous File Operations
Detects:
Mass deletion commands
Recursive operations without safeguards
Operations on test files without confirmation
No human-in-the-loop for destructive actions
Patterns:
- "rm -rf" without confirmation
- "delete all test files"
- "recursively remove"
- Missing safety checksVibe Coding Overreach
Detects:
Requests for complete applications
Massive line count targets (1000+ lines)
Unrealistic timeframes
Scope without proper planning
Patterns:
- "build a complete social network"
- "5000 lines of code"
- "everything in one shot"
- Missing architectural planningUnsupported Claims
Detects:
Absolute statements without hedging
Statistical claims without sources
Over-confident predictions
Missing citations
Patterns:
- "always/never/definitely"
- "95% of doctors agree" (no source)
- "guaranteed to work"
- Missing uncertainty languageRisk Levels
Calculated based on weighted confidence scores:
LOW: Minor issues, no immediate intervention needed
MODERATE: Worth noting, consider additional verification
HIGH: Significant concern, interventions recommended
CRITICAL: Serious risk, multiple interventions strongly advised
Intervention Types
Step Breakdown
Complex tasks should be broken into verifiable components.
Recommended for:
Math/physics speculation
Large coding projects
Dangerous file operations
Human-in-the-Loop
Critical decisions require human oversight.
Recommended for:
Medical advice
Destructive file operations
High-severity issues
Web Search
Claims should be verified against authoritative sources.
Recommended for:
Medical recommendations
Physics/math theories
Unsupported factual claims
Simplified Scope
Overly ambitious projects need realistic scoping.
Recommended for:
Vibe coding requests
Complex system designs
Feature-heavy applications
Configuration
Character Limit
Default: 25,000 characters per response
CHARACTER_LIMIT = 25000Taxonomy Capacity
Default: 1,000 evidence entries
MAX_EVIDENCE_ENTRIES = 1000Detection Sensitivity
Adjust pattern matching and confidence thresholds in detection functions:
def detect_math_physics_speculation(text: str) -> Dict[str, Any]:
# Modify patterns or confidence calculations
...Integration Examples
Claude Desktop App
Add to your claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"togmal": {
"command": "python",
"args": ["/path/to/togmal_mcp.py"]
}
}
}CLI Testing
# Run the server
python togmal_mcp.py
# In another terminal, test with MCP inspector
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector python togmal_mcp.pyProgrammatic Usage
from mcp.client import Client
async def analyze_prompt(prompt: str):
async with Client("togmal") as client:
result = await client.call_tool(
"togmal_analyze_prompt",
{"prompt": prompt, "response_format": "json"}
)
return resultArchitecture
Design Principles
Privacy First: No external API calls, all processing local
Deterministic: Heuristic-based detection for reproducibility
Low Latency: Fast pattern matching for real-time use
Extensible: Easy to add new patterns and categories
Human-Centered: Always allows human override and judgment
Future Enhancements
The system is designed for progressive enhancement:
Phase 1 (Current): Heuristic pattern matching
Phase 2 (Planned): Traditional ML models (clustering, anomaly detection)
Phase 3 (Future): Federated learning from submitted evidence
Phase 4 (Advanced): Custom fine-tuned models for specific domains
Data Flow
User Prompt
↓
togmal_analyze_prompt
↓
Detection Heuristics (parallel)
├── Math/Physics
├── Medical Advice
├── File Operations
├── Vibe Coding
└── Unsupported Claims
↓
Risk Calculation
↓
Intervention Recommendations
↓
Response to ClientContributing
Adding New Detection Patterns
Create a new detection function:
def detect_new_category(text: str) -> Dict[str, Any]:
patterns = {
'subcategory1': [r'pattern1', r'pattern2'],
'subcategory2': [r'pattern3']
}
# Implement detection logic
return {
'detected': bool,
'categories': list,
'confidence': float
}Add to CategoryType enum
Update analysis functions to include new detector
Add intervention recommendations if needed
Submitting Evidence
Use the togmal_submit_evidence tool to contribute examples of problematic LLM behavior. This helps improve detection for everyone.
Limitations
Current Constraints
Heuristic-Based: May have false positives/negatives
English-Only: Patterns optimized for English text
Context-Free: Doesn't understand full conversation history
No Learning: Detection rules are static until updated
Not a Replacement For
Professional judgment in critical domains (medicine, law, etc.)
Comprehensive code review
Security auditing
Safety testing in production systems
License
MIT License - See LICENSE file for details
Support
For issues, questions, or contributions:
Open an issue on GitHub
Submit evidence through the MCP tool
Contact: [Your contact information]
Citation
If you use ToGMAL in your research or product, please cite:
@software{togmal_mcp,
title={ToGMAL: Taxonomy of Generative Model Apparent Limitations},
author={[Your Name]},
year={2025},
url={https://github.com/[your-repo]/togmal-mcp}
}Acknowledgments
Built using:
Inspired by the need for safer, more grounded AI interactions.
This server cannot be deployed
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Deterministic runtime safety for AI agents: scan PII, gate tool actions, verify LLM output.
Sentiment, toxicity, entity extraction, PII, translation, summary, QA, fraud scoring, safety audit.
Hallucination & safety checks for LLM/Agent outputs: claim-level fact-check with citations.
Jailbreak-proof AI guardrails. Automated Reasoning SMT solver, not an LLM. ZK proofs included.
Related MCP Servers
AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceIntegrates AI safety analysis, red-teaming, and prompt auditing directly into MCP-compatible clients like Claude Desktop and Cursor IDE, allowing real-time analysis of prompts and detection of jailbreak attempts.283Apache 2.0- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides real-time content safety protection for large language models by detecting and preventing risks in both input and output content across multiple dimensions including compliance, ethics, and security.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides real-time content security for large language models by identifying and intercepting risks across compliance, ethics, and safety dimensions. It enables secure input and output monitoring through a customizable policy engine using an SSE-based interface.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides a pre-flight/post-flight firewall for LLM calls with comprehensive detection, classification, policy enforcement, reversible redaction, output safety, and immutable audit logging.1MIT