cafecito
OfficialProvides tools for coordinating AI agents working on a Git repository, enabling parallel landing of independent changes and regenerative merge for collisions.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@cafecitoland my changes on main"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
cafecito ☕
An integration control plane for AI agent fleets. Prove independence when you can. Re-derive when you can't. Never resolve a conflict.
Status: v0.8 — a working single-repo control plane. The physics is validated (phase0/, bench/); the engine, MCP server, fleet (
swarm/watch), PR gateway (ingest), memoized gates, and wave-parallel landing all run for real — and every feature since v0.1 landed through cafecito itself. Not yet: multi-repo, webhooks/hosted App, containers. Sharp edges remain.

34 unedited seconds: three agents branch from the same commit; two commute and land in
parallel, the third collides and is regenerated from both intents by a live reconciler call —
gated, trailer-stamped, main green. Run it yourself: examples/demo.sh.
Quickstart
pipx install git+https://github.com/cafecitohq/cafecito # or: pip install . from a clone
cafecito init --repo /path/to/your/repo --test-cmd "python3 -m pytest -q"
claude mcp add cafecito -- cafecito serve --repo /path/to/your/repoOr skip the wiring and summon the fleet directly:
cafecito swarm "add rate limiting to the API, a retry helper, and tests for both" --agents 3
cafecito watch # in another terminal: the live fleet dashboardswarm plans the goal into independent tasks, pre-claims leases, runs the agents in
parallel, and lands everything through the gate — commuting changes in parallel, collisions
regenerated, contradictions escalated to you. watch shows it happening live:

(Real recording: one sentence → three agents → three gated landings → green main, 31s.
Reproduce it: python3 examples/demo_swarm.py.)
Since v0.1, every feature of cafecito has been landed through cafecito — the story (including the release we broke and what it taught us) is in docs/building-itself.md.
Any MCP-capable agent then coordinates through four tools: sync (get the landed tip or a
ready worktree), reserve (advisory leases on symbols before starting work), submit (land a
committed changeset), status. Commuting changesets land immediately; collisions are
regenerated from both intents by a reconciler; every landing passes a real test gate; main
is materialized as a normal git branch (cafecito/main). Agents never rebase and never see a
conflict marker. Humans drive it from the shell: cafecito submit | status | log | advance —
or keep opening ordinary GitHub PRs and let cafecito ingest land them through the plane.
Symbol-level write sets for Python, TypeScript/JavaScript, and Go (stdlib scanners —
anything unanalyzable widens safely to file granularity); other languages land at file
granularity today. Verification facts: with gate_mode: full, every landing gates on the whole test
suite — but verdicts are content-addressed by input closure, so only tests the landing
actually touched execute; the rest inherit facts. Generated files (lockfiles etc.)
skip merging and the reconciler:
declare cafecito init --generated "package-lock.json=npm install --package-lock-only" and
conflicts re-run the generator against the merged sources — in our TypeScript corpus that
was 58 of 60 real conflicts. Prove it locally: python3 -m cafecito.tests.smoke.
Related MCP server: Geond Agent Protocol
The problem
Run five coding agents against one repo and you'll watch them gridlock: the first merge to
main forces every other agent to rebase, rerun tests, and rejoin the queue. Merge queues
serialize integration, so fleet throughput is capped at 1 / CI-duration no matter how many
agents you run — and CI spend grows quadratically as everyone re-tests everyone else's rebases.
The bottleneck isn't git's storage; it's three assumptions from the human era:
Line-based merge semantics — the system can't distinguish "independent" from "colliding," so it assumes collision.
Whole-repo serialization — every landing invalidates every other candidate.
Integration coupled to CI wall-clock — position changes in the queue trigger full re-tests whose results were already knowable.
The bet
Agent fleets invert the cost model of software integration: generation is nearly free; verification and coherence are scarce. Once regenerating code costs pennies, merging text is the wrong operation. cafecito is built on two primitives that follow:
Commutativity-proven parallel landing. Changesets carry symbol-level write sets. Provably disjoint changes land in parallel — no rebase, no re-test (verification results are content-addressed facts, not rituals). Only true collisions serialize.
Regenerative merge. When changes truly collide, no one "resolves the conflict": a fresh agent regenerates the overlapping region once, from both changes' intents and acceptance tests, gated by CI.
Coordination also moves earlier: agents take short leases on symbols at intent time, so contention is discovered before work is wasted, not at merge time.
Git stays as the interop boundary — main is always materialized as a normal git branch for
humans, CI, and deploy tooling. Agents talk to the control plane through an MCP server and
never run git rebase.
Vocabulary, used strictly throughout: changesets land; collisions commute, regenerate, or escalate; merge is reserved for git's textual mechanism and the market category it replaces (see SPEC.md §1.1).
Repository layout
Path | What | Status |
Falsification experiments A (commutativity rate) and B (regenerative-merge success rate) on real repos | active | |
Protocol: changesets, leases, landed log, verification facts, MCP surface | v0 — all surfaces implemented | |
The product: oracle (py/ts/js/go/json write sets), engine (commute/regenerate/escalate, memoized gates, wave-parallel admission), MCP server, | v0.8 | |
TypeScript / Python client SDKs | design | |
Git gateway: materialized branch, | shipped in cafecito/ | |
MergeBench — a real 33-agent burst: 5.5h serial queue vs 1.37h cafecito (10-min CI), 93.5 vs 16.2 CI-hours, landed for real with green main | active | |
Full project plan, roadmap, and competitive analysis | living doc |
Run the Phase 0 experiments
cd phase0
python3 run_corpus.py --repos <clones...> # A + conflict scan, many repos
python3 experiment_a.py --repo <path-to-clone> --since 2024-06-01 # commutativity rate
python3 find_conflicts.py --repo <path-to-clone> # attributed conflict corpus
python3 experiment_b.py --repo <path-to-clone> --max-pairs 5 # regenerative merge
python3 validate_b.py --repo <path-to-clone> # dual test-suite validation
python3 agent_corpus.py --repo <clone> --targets <files...> # uncoordinated-fleet corpusPython 3.10+ and git ≥ 2.38. Stdlib only — no dependencies. See phase0/README.md for methodology and current numbers.
License
Apache-2.0. Contributions require DCO sign-off — see CONTRIBUTING.md.
"cafecito" started as the codename and won the vote to stay. The coffee is load-bearing. Home: cafeci.to · code: github.com/Cafecitohq/cafecito
This server cannot be installed
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Latest Blog Posts
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Cafecitohq/cafecito'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server