TokenMizer
Acts as a proxy for Google Gemini, applying compression, semantic caching, and memory graph features to reduce token consumption and maintain conversational context.
Supports proxying requests to Ollama's locally hosted models, with the same pipeline of compression, caching, and graph memory for efficient and persistent AI interactions.
Provides an OpenAI-compatible proxy endpoint that adds compression, semantic caching, and graph-based memory to any OpenAI model, reducing token usage and enabling session persistence.
The Problem
Every AI session has a context limit. When you hit it:
The model forgets every decision, rationale, and context built over hours
You waste 10–30 minutes re-explaining the project every new session
Large files (CSV, PDF, Excel) eat your entire token budget instantly
Related MCP server: Hippocampus
How TokenMizer Solves It
TokenMizer is a local proxy between your app and any LLM. Every request goes through a pipeline that builds a live knowledge graph, compresses inputs, caches responses, and auto-checkpoints before context runs out.
Your App → TokenMizer (:8000) → Claude / GPT / Gemini / any LLM
│
┌─────────┴──────────────┐
│ 6-Layer Pipeline │
│ L0 File Intel │ CSV/PDF/Excel → schema + sample
│ L1 Compression │ 15–40% input reduction
│ L2 Output Trim │ 5–15% output reduction
│ L3 Semantic Cache │ 100% on repeated queries
│ L4 Graph Memory │ session continuity
│ L5 Prompt Cache │ 90% on repeated system prompts
└────────────────────────┘Architecture
Decision Memory — 4-State Model
Status | Meaning | In Resume |
🟢 | Current — in effect | ✅ Always |
🟡 | Replaced by newer decision | ⚠️ 7 days |
🔴 | Explicitly wrong/cancelled | ⚠️ Always (warning) |
⬜ | Old but valid, not relevant | ❌ Never |
History is never deleted. "Why did we switch from React to Next.js?" — always answerable.
Quick Start
Step 0 — Check Python (need 3.10 or newer)
Open a terminal (Windows: press Win, type "PowerShell", Enter · Mac: Cmd+Space, type "Terminal"):
python --versionYou should see Python 3.10 or higher. If not: install from python.org/downloads (Windows: tick "Add Python to PATH" during install).
Step 1 — Install TokenMizer
pip install "tokenmizer[anthropic,cache]"✅ You should see: Successfully installed tokenmizer-...
Step 2 — Add your API key (get one at console.anthropic.com → API Keys)
Windows PowerShell:
setx TOKENMIZER_ANTHROPIC_API_KEY "sk-ant-YOUR-KEY"then close and reopen the terminal.
Mac/Linux:
export TOKENMIZER_ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-YOUR-KEY(No key? Use free local Ollama instead — see "No API key?" below.)
Step 3 — Start TokenMizer
tokenmizer serve✅ You should see: Proxy: http://localhost:8000/v1/chat/completions
Leave this terminal open — TokenMizer runs here.
Step 4 — Verify it's alive
Open http://localhost:8000 in your browser → the TokenMizer dashboard appears. That's it — the proxy works.
Step 5 — Connect your tool (pick yours)
Cursor: Settings → Models → OpenAI API → Base URL:
http://localhost:8000/v1Claude Desktop / Claude Code: see Claude Code Integration below (copy one JSON block, restart the app)
Your own Python code: see "Use — change one line" below
Something failed? pip not found → reinstall Python with "Add to PATH". Port 8000 busy → tokenmizer serve --port 8001. Anything else → open an issue with the error text — median response < 1 day.
1. Install
Works on Windows, macOS, and Linux (Python 3.10+). Same command everywhere:
# Recommended
pip install "tokenmizer[anthropic,cache]"
# All providers
pip install "tokenmizer[anthropic,openai,gemini,cohere,cache]"# macOS: brew install ollama
# Windows: winget install Ollama.Ollama (or download from ollama.com)
# Linux: curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh
ollama pull llama3
pip install tokenmizer
# then set provider: ollama in tokenmizer.yaml2. Set your API key
macOS / Linux (bash, zsh):
export TOKENMIZER_ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-...Windows (PowerShell):
$env:TOKENMIZER_ANTHROPIC_API_KEY = "sk-ant-..." # current session
setx TOKENMIZER_ANTHROPIC_API_KEY "sk-ant-..." # persistent (new terminals)Other providers: TOKENMIZER_OPENAI_API_KEY, TOKENMIZER_GEMINI_API_KEY, etc. — full table in Supported Providers.
3. Start
tokenmizer serve
# → Proxy: http://localhost:8000/v1/chat/completions
# → Dashboard: http://localhost:8000
# → API docs: http://localhost:8000/docs4. Use — change one line
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
api_key="your-key",
base_url="http://localhost:8000/v1", # ← only this changes
)
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-6",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Let's build an auth service"}],
extra_body={"session_id": "my-project"}, # enables graph memory
)✅ Streaming works (v0.3+):
stream: truegives real SSE passthrough for Anthropic, OpenAI, DeepSeek, Mistral, OpenRouter, Grok and Ollama. Cursor and Continue.dev work with default settings — no config changes needed.
Claude Code Integration
Option A — Plugin (recommended)
# Add TokenMizer as a plugin marketplace
/plugin marketplace add Shweta-Mishra-ai/tokenmizer
# Install
/plugin install tokenmizer@Shweta-Mishra-ai/tokenmizerThen use skills directly:
/tokenmizer:checkpoint my-project → save session to graph memory
/tokenmizer:resume my-project → load previous session (300 tokens)
/tokenmizer:resume my-project full → full 600-token context
/tokenmizer:analyze /data/sales.csv → analyze file (99% token savings)
/tokenmizer:stats → token savings reportOption B — MCP server (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, Zed)
mcp-name: io.github.Shweta-Mishra-ai/tokenmizer
Add this mcpServers block to your client's MCP config file:
{
"mcpServers": {
"tokenmizer": {
"command": "tokenmizer-mcp",
"env": { "TOKENMIZER_URL": "http://localhost:8000" }
}
}
}Where the config file lives:
Client | Config file |
Claude Desktop (Windows) |
|
Claude Desktop (macOS) |
|
Claude Code |
|
Cursor | Settings → MCP → Add server (same JSON) |
VS Code / Zed | their MCP settings — same |
OpenAI Codex CLI |
|
[mcp_servers.tokenmizer]
command = "tokenmizer-mcp"
env = { TOKENMIZER_URL = "http://localhost:8000" }Then restart the client. Keep tokenmizer serve running for the
checkpoint/resume/stats tools (file analysis works without it).
If tokenmizer-mcp isn't on your PATH, use "command": "python",
"args": ["-m", "tokenmizer.mcp.server"] instead.
Other Tools
Cursor / Continue.dev / any OpenAI-compatible tool:
API Base URL: http://localhost:8000/v1Session Resume
tokenmizer checkpoint my-project
tokenmizer resume my-projectGoal: Build FastAPI auth service with JWT + PostgreSQL
Done: Project setup | User model | Login endpoint | Fix 422 | 18 tests passing
In progress: Refresh token rotation
Decided: PostgreSQL (concurrent writes) | bcrypt | Redis for refresh tokens
Changed: ~~React~~ → Next.js (better SEO)
Files: api/auth.py, api/models.py, config.py
Continue: Implement token refresh endpoint247 tokens replaces 25,000+ tokens of conversation history.
File Intelligence
from tokenmizer.filters.file_intelligence import FileIntelligence
fi = FileIntelligence()
result = fi.process(open("sales.csv","rb").read(), "sales.csv",
token_budget=500, query="which regions underperforming")
# 412,000 tokens → 447 tokens (99.9% saved)File | Savings |
CSV (50k rows) | 99.9% |
PDF (200 pages) | 98.8% |
Excel (10 sheets) | 99.7% |
JSON (1k items) | 95% |
Works Alongside Caveman & CodeBurn
TokenMizer complements — does not replace — these tools:
Tool | What it does |
Caveman | Output tokens shorter (~65%) |
CodeBurn | Input context trimming |
TokenMizer | Graph memory + resume + file intelligence + cache |
Tip: If using Caveman, set
terse_output: enabled: falseintokenmizer.yamlto avoid conflicting system prompts.
Supported Providers
Model strings pass through unchanged — the newest models work out of the box:
claude-fable-5, claude-opus-4-8, claude-sonnet-5, claude-haiku-4-5,
GPT-4o/o-series, Gemini 1.5/2.0, and any Ollama/OpenRouter model.
Provider | Env var |
Anthropic (Claude) |
|
OpenAI |
|
Google Gemini |
|
DeepSeek |
|
Mistral |
|
Grok (xAI) |
|
Cohere |
|
OpenRouter |
|
Ollama | No key — free, local |
Configuration
# tokenmizer.yaml
provider: anthropic
default_model: claude-sonnet-4-6
graph_checkpoint:
enabled: true
trigger_at_percent: 0.85
use_llm_extraction: false # true = 80%+ recall, needs key (~$0.001/turn)
compression:
enabled: true
cache:
enabled: true
max_size: 10000
state_backend: memory # memory | redis (production)All settings via env vars: TOKENMIZER_PROVIDER, TOKENMIZER_API_KEY, etc.
Docker
# Quick start
docker-compose up tokenmizer
# With Redis (production)
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-... docker-compose up
# With proxy auth
TOKENMIZER_API_KEY=strong-key docker-compose upAPI Reference
Endpoint | Method | Description |
| POST | OpenAI-compatible proxy |
| GET | Get resume context |
| POST | Manual checkpoint |
| POST | Mark decision as invalid |
| GET | Session graph stats |
| GET | Interactive graph page — open, drag, zoom, share |
| GET | Token savings analytics |
| GET | Health check |
| GET | Swagger UI |
Security
API key auth —
TOKENMIZER_API_KEY(constant-time comparison)Secret/PII redaction applied once at ingestion, before graph storage, checkpoint storage, AND every LLM call (main chat and the background extraction model — these are separate, the redaction gap between them was a real bug, now fixed)
Session-isolated cache (sensitive data never shared across sessions)
Basic prompt-injection keyword filter — catches copy-pasted jailbreak templates only; not a security boundary against a motivated adversary. See SECURITY.md for exactly what it does and doesn't catch.
CORS restricted to configured origins by default
Benchmarks
python benchmarks/checkpoint_accuracy/runner_v2.py
pytest tests/ -vBenchmark v2 — Graph vs plain Summary (3 sessions, heuristic-only, measured 2026-07-02 on v0.2.4):
Method | Task Recall | Decision Recall | File Recall | Info Preserved |
TokenMizer Graph | 76% | 85% | 100% | 87% |
Plain Summary baseline | 76% | 70% | 92% | 79% |
Δ advantage | 0% | +15% | +8% | +8% |
Avg resume size: 254 tokens vs ~1,500+ tokens of raw history. (n=3 synthetic sessions — small sample; treat as directional, reproduce with the command above.)
Enable use_llm_extraction: true for hybrid extraction (LLM + heuristic merge).
On LLM/hybrid recall numbers — read this before trusting any percentage
here: earlier versions of this README quoted "90-100% hybrid recall"
sourced from runner_v3.py's MockLLMProvider. That mock sampled its
fake output directly from the same ground-truth dict used to score
recall — circular by construction, guaranteed to look good regardless of
what the real extraction logic did. It measured nothing about actual LLM
extraction quality. That number has been removed rather than replaced
with a better-sounding one we can't back up.
What runner_v3.py now actually does:
Default mode verifies
HybridExtractor.merge()'s logic contract against fixtures with deliberately known overlap (corroborated / LLM-only / heuristic-only items) — confirms merge never drops an item either source found, and applies confidence tiers (0.95 corroborated, 0.80 LLM-only, 0.65 heuristic-only) correctly. This is a real, non-circular check, but it's a logic-contract test, not a recall measurement.--livemode calls a real configured provider (ANTHROPIC_API_KEYorOPENAI_API_KEY) and scores its actual output against ground truth. This is the only path that produces a number meaningful enough to put in a table. Run it yourself — we're not publishing a live-mode number here because n=3 sessions is too small a sample to generalize, and publishing one without a large, ongoing benchmark would just be swapping one unsubstantiated number for another.
Heuristic-only numbers above (76-100%) ARE real, deterministic,
reproducible measurements — runner_v2.py runs actual heuristic
extraction against actual ground truth with no LLM and no mocking
involved, which is why those numbers are presented with confidence
and the LLM ones currently are not.
Why TokenMizer and not X?
Engineers ask this every time. Honest answers:
Why not just use Git history? Git stores what changed, not why you decided to change it. You can't ask Git "what did we decide about auth?" or "why did we switch from MySQL to PostgreSQL?" TokenMizer stores decisions with trigger, reason, and evidence — not diffs.
Why not RAG (retrieval-augmented generation)?
RAG retrieves relevant chunks — it doesn't model decision state. If you switched from bcrypt to Argon2 mid-session, RAG might retrieve both and confuse the model about which is current. TokenMizer tracks decision supersession explicitly: old decision is marked SUPERSEDED, new decision is ACTIVE. Resume context only includes current state.
Why not a plain summary at the start of each session? Summaries lose structure. You can't query "all superseded decisions" or "what triggered the auth change" from a blob of text. Our benchmark shows graph memory preserves +5% more information than a summary baseline — and unlike summaries, the graph is queryable, editable, and grows incrementally without re-summarizing everything each turn.
Why not Mem0 or Zep? Mem0 and Zep store facts ("user prefers Python"). TokenMizer stores decisions with rationale — the full causal chain: what was decided, what replaced it, why, what evidence triggered the change, and how confidence shifted. If you need "remember my name across sessions," use Mem0. If you need "remember that we switched from PostgreSQL to SQLite because of cost, and here's the evidence," use TokenMizer.
Why not just a longer context window? Longer context = higher cost + slower inference + model attention dilution on long histories. TokenMizer compresses a 50-turn session into ~246 tokens of structured context — not by summarizing, but by extracting what actually matters: goals, active decisions, current tasks, recent errors.
CLI
tokenmizer serve [--port 8000]
tokenmizer checkpoint <session-id>
tokenmizer resume <session-id> [--level standard|full|critical]
tokenmizer statsNote on file analysis:
/tokenmizer:analyze(used from inside Claude Code, see Claude Code Integration above) is real and works — it's a plugin skill (.claude-plugin/skills/analyze/) that callsFileIntelligencedirectly via an inline Python snippet, independent of the CLI/API layer. What does not exist is a baretokenmizer analyze <file>terminal command or a/api/analyzeHTTP endpoint — useful if you want file analysis from a plain shell or a non-Claude-Code tool (Cursor, a script, curl, etc.) rather than inside Claude Code specifically. Found during a documentation accuracy pass: an earlier version of this README listedtokenmizer analyze <file>in this CLI section as if it were acli.pycommand — it never was. Removed from here rather than left in place pointing at something that would fail. Tracked as a real, wanted gap — contributions adding a/api/analyzeendpoint + thin CLI wrapper (following the existing pattern incli.py) are welcome.
Roadmap
Version | Focus |
v0.3 | SSE streaming passthrough (checkpoint on stream close) |
v0.4 | Cross-session memory · embedding-based edge linking |
v0.5 | Per-node storage schema (scale past 200-node graphs) |
Research | Real-transcript benchmark suite → paper (tokenmizer-research) |
Have a use case that doesn't fit? Open an issue — extraction misses have their own issue template.
Contributing
Contributions welcome — this project merges fast (median PR review < 1 day).
git clone https://github.com/Shweta-Mishra-ai/tokenmizer
cd tokenmizer
pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest tests/ -v && ruff check tokenmizer/ # 218 tests, must stay green
python scripts/mcp_e2e_check.py # full-pipeline e2e checkHighest-impact areas right now:
Graph extraction quality — real-world transcripts where extraction misses tasks/decisions (file an extraction-miss issue even if you don't fix it — the failing transcript itself is the contribution)
SSE streaming (v0.3 headline feature)
Benchmark sessions — add a real session + ground truth to
benchmarks/
Every PR runs the full CI gauntlet (tests × 3 Python versions, lint, Docker build). See CONTRIBUTING.md for guidelines and TESTING.md for the test architecture.
Support the project
TokenMizer is built and maintained by one person. If it saved you tokens, time, or a lost session:
⭐ Star the repo — the single best way to help others find it
🐛 Report a bug — especially extraction misses
📣 Share your before/after token numbers (
tokenmizer stats) — real usage data shapes the roadmap
License
MIT © Shweta Mishra
This server cannot be installed
Maintenance
Latest Blog Posts
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Shweta-Mishra-ai/tokenmizer'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server