gta-map-locations

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must cover transparency. It discloses that daily categories show today's spawns, implying time-sensitivity, but does not mention any side effects, permissions, or rate limits. The behavior is adequately described but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence followed by a brief clarifying note about daily categories. Every phrase adds value, and it is front-loaded with the core action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description hints at the return (map link and optional live panel) but lacks specifics like format or structure. For a 2-parameter tool, it is fairly complete, but could be slightly more explicit about what the map link looks like.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds context by explaining that categories are slugs/names referencing gta-map-categories and the purpose of includeLiveData, but does not add significant meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves a map link and optionally live data for GTA Online map categories, with concrete examples like street-dealers and daily spawns. It distinguishes itself from siblings by specifying its unique output.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains when to use (for map links and live panels by category) and notes daily categories show today's spawns. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use or provide direct alternatives, though it references gta-map-categories in the parameter description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.