gta-gun-van

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden. It clearly indicates a read-only operation (providing location/map) with no side effects mentioned. It does not explicitly state safety or non-destructiveness, but the nature of the tool makes this obvious.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that conveys essential information without any wordiness. Every part earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero parameters and no output schema, the description is completely sufficient. It tells the user exactly what the tool provides (location, map, items). No additional details are needed for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, and schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 4. The description adds meaning beyond the empty schema by explaining what the tool returns.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool provides 'Today's GTA Online Gun Van location + map' and specifies the contents (daily discounted weapons, armor, MkII ammo). The verb 'provides' and resource 'Gun Van location + map' are specific and distinguish it from sibling tools like gta-drug-vehicle or gta-exotic-exports.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'Today's' implies daily freshness, guiding use for current-day info. However, no explicit alternatives or when-not-to-use guidance is given. For a simple info tool, this is adequate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.