MCP Terminal Server
Servidor de terminales MCP
Un servidor de ejecución de terminal seguro que implementa el Protocolo de Contexto de Modelo (MCP). Este servidor proporciona capacidades de ejecución controlada de comandos con funciones de seguridad y límites de recursos.
Características
Ejecución de comandos : Ejecute comandos de shell con captura de salida y manejo de errores
Controles de seguridad : restrinja los comandos permitidos y evite la inyección de comandos
Controles de recursos :
Tiempos de espera de comandos
Límites de tamaño máximo de salida
Compatibilidad con el protocolo MCP :
Formato de mensaje MCP estándar
Anuncio de capacidad
Compatibilidad con salida de streaming
Related MCP server: MCP Terminal
Desarrollo
Configuración local
# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/RinardNick/mcp-terminal.git
cd mcp-terminal
# Create and activate virtual environment using uv
uv venv
source .venv/bin/activate # or .venv\Scripts\activate on Windows
# Install development dependencies
uv pip install -e ".[dev]"Publicación en PyPI
# Build the package
uv pip install build
python -m build
# Upload to PyPI
uv pip install twine
python -m twine upload dist/*Pruebas con MCP Inspector
La herramienta MCP Inspector se puede utilizar para probar la implementación del servidor:
# Install inspector
npm install -g @modelcontextprotocol/inspector
# Test server
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector python3 src/mcp_terminal/server.py --allowed-commands "python,pip,git,ls,cd"Ejecución de pruebas
# Run all tests
pytest tests/
# Run specific test file
pytest tests/test_terminal.py
# Run with coverage
pytest --cov=mcp_terminal tests/Uso con Claude Desktop
Una vez que el paquete se publica en PyPI:
Instalar UV (si aún no está instalado):
pip install uvInstalar el paquete usando UV :
uv pip install mcp-terminalConfigurar Claude Desktop : edite el archivo de configuración de Claude Desktop (normalmente en
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.jsonen macOS):{ "mcpServers": { "terminal": { "command": "uv", "args": [ "pip", "run", "mcp-terminal", "--allowed-commands", "python,pip,git,ls,cd", "--timeout-ms", "30000", "--max-output-size", "1048576" ] } } }
Implementación del protocolo
El servidor implementa el Protocolo de Contexto de Modelo (MCP) con las siguientes capacidades:
Anuncio de capacidades
{
"protocol": "1.0.0",
"name": "terminal",
"version": "1.1.0",
"capabilities": {
"execute": {
"description": "Execute a terminal command",
"parameters": {
"command": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The command to execute"
}
},
"returns": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"exitCode": { "type": "number" },
"stdout": { "type": "string" },
"stderr": { "type": "string" },
"startTime": { "type": "string" },
"endTime": { "type": "string" }
}
}
}
}
}Formato del mensaje
Pedido :
{
"type": "execute",
"data": {
"command": "echo 'hello world'"
}
}Respuesta :
{
"type": "result",
"data": {
"command": "echo 'hello world'",
"exitCode": 0,
"stdout": "hello world\n",
"stderr": "",
"startTime": "2024-01-20T12:34:56.789Z",
"endTime": "2024-01-20T12:34:56.790Z"
}
}Error :
{
"type": "error",
"data": {
"message": "command not allowed"
}
}Consideraciones de seguridad
Validación de comandos :
Sólo se pueden ejecutar los comandos permitidos
Los operadores de Shell están bloqueados
Se evitan los intentos de inyección de comandos
Protección de recursos :
Los tiempos de espera de los comandos evitan que se cuelguen
Los límites de tamaño de salida evitan el agotamiento de la memoria
Manejo de errores para todos los casos de falla
Mejores prácticas :
Establezca siempre
allowed-commandsen producciónUtilice límites de tamaño y tiempo de espera conservadores
Supervisar los registros de ejecución de comandos
Contribuyendo
Bifurcar el repositorio
Crea tu rama de funciones (
git checkout -b feature/amazing-feature)Confirme sus cambios (
git commit -m 'Add some amazing feature')Empujar a la rama (
git push origin feature/amazing-feature)Abrir una solicitud de extracción
Licencia
Este proyecto está licenciado bajo la licencia MIT: consulte el archivo de LICENCIA para obtener más detalles.
Available Tools
1 toolrun_commandC
Run a terminal command with security controls.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| allowedCommands | No | Optional list of allowed command executables | |
| command | Yes | The command to execute | |
| maxOutputSize | No | Maximum output size in bytes (default: 1MB) | |
| timeoutMs | No | Maximum execution time in milliseconds (default: 30 seconds) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. While it mentions 'security controls' which suggests safety features, it doesn't specify what those controls are, what permissions are required, whether commands run in a sandbox, what happens on failure, or any rate limits. The description provides minimal behavioral context beyond the basic purpose.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise - a single sentence that communicates the core purpose and a key characteristic ('with security controls'). Every word earns its place, and there's no unnecessary verbiage or repetition. It's front-loaded with the essential information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a command execution tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is insufficient. It doesn't explain what the tool returns (success/failure indicators, output format, error handling), doesn't detail the security controls mentioned, and provides minimal behavioral context. Given the potential complexity and risks of command execution, more completeness is needed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has 100% description coverage, so all parameters are documented in the structured schema. The description adds no additional parameter information beyond what's already in the schema descriptions. The baseline score of 3 is appropriate when the schema does the heavy lifting for parameter documentation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb ('Run') and resource ('a terminal command'), specifying it's for executing commands in a terminal environment. It adds the qualifier 'with security controls' which provides important context about the tool's nature. However, without sibling tools, it cannot demonstrate differentiation from alternatives.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus other approaches or alternatives. It doesn't mention prerequisites, typical use cases, or scenarios where this tool would be preferred over direct terminal access or other execution methods. The 'security controls' mention hints at a context but doesn't provide explicit usage rules.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
1 tool update
v1.0.0- First observed
run_command
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined as running terminal commands with security controls, making it distinct by default.
The single tool follows a clear verb_noun pattern (run_command), which is consistent and predictable. Since there are no other tools to compare against, it inherently maintains perfect naming consistency.
A single tool for a terminal server is too few for the apparent scope, as terminal operations typically involve multiple actions (e.g., list files, navigate directories, monitor processes). This minimal set feels thin and incomplete for the domain.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for a terminal server domain. While run_command covers command execution, there are obvious gaps such as listing files, checking system status, or managing processes, which will likely cause agent failures in typical terminal workflows.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Enable secure connectivity between Sentry issues and debugging data, and LLM clients, using a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server.
Run commands and read/write files on your servers over Termalin's keyless tunnels (hosted MCP).
MCP server for mandates, delegation, policy-gated execution, credential grants, and audit.
A comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants to interact with yo…
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA secure shell command execution server implementing the Model Context Protocol (MCP). This server allows remote execution of whitelisted shell commands with support for stdin input.1195MIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceA server that enables AI assistants to execute terminal commands and retrieve outputs via the Model Context Protocol (MCP).327MIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceA secure server that implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to enable controlled execution of authorized shell commands with stdin support.1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA secure Model Context Protocol server that allows AI assistants to execute terminal commands with controlled directory access and command permissions. It features a robust security architecture including whitelisting, session IDs, and categorized command levels to ensure safe system interaction.8MIT