Skip to main content
Glama

mt_travel_issue_vc

Issue cryptographically signed travel credentials authorizing AI agents to book on behalf of principals with enforced spend limits and segment permissions.

Instructions

Issue a TravelAgentCredential (W3C Verifiable Credential) for a booking agent.

Creates a cryptographically signed credential that authorizes an AI agent to book travel on behalf of a principal (company/human), with enforced segment permissions and spend limits.

Args: agent_did: DID of the travel agent (e.g. "did:base:0x...") principal_did: DID of the authorizing entity (e.g. "did:base:acme-corp") segments: Comma-separated allowed segments (e.g. "hotel,flight,car_rental") spend_limit: Maximum spend amount per booking currency: Currency code (e.g. "USDC") traveler_name: Name of the authorized traveler (optional) validity_days: Number of days the credential is valid (default 30)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
agent_didYes
principal_didYes
segmentsYes
spend_limitYes
currencyYes
traveler_nameNo
validity_daysNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description compensates by explaining cryptographic signing, enforced segment permissions, spend limits, and validity periods, though omits operational details like costs or prerequisites.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-structured with clear opening summary followed by Args section; every sentence provides value without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Comprehensive coverage of all 7 parameters with defaults/optionality noted; output schema exists so return value explanation is unnecessary.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% description coverage; description fully compensates with detailed Args section including examples (e.g., 'did:base:0x...', 'hotel,flight,car_rental') and semantics (e.g., 'Maximum spend amount per booking').

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Explicitly states it issues a TravelAgentCredential for booking agents, distinguishes from siblings via travel-specific details (hotel/flight/car_rental segments) and cryptographic authorization features.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies usage through domain-specific terms (travel, booking) but lacks explicit when-to-use guidance versus siblings like mt_shopping_issue_vc or mt_skill_issue_vc.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/MoltyCel/mol-trust'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server