MolTrust

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Lacking annotations, the description only adds the semantic meaning of the score range (1=untrusted, 5=highly trusted) but omits side effects, persistence, or authentication requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise and well-structured with purpose front-loaded, followed immediately by parameter definitions without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Minimum viable coverage given the simple schema; while output schema exists (covering returns), the description lacks behavioral context (mutability, costs) that would aid agent decision-making.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Compensates effectively for 0% schema description coverage by clearly defining all three parameters (from_did, to_did, score) and their purposes in the Args section.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the specific action (submitting a 1-5 star trust rating between agents) with distinct verb and resource, though could better differentiate from sibling endorsement tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides no explicit guidance on when to use this versus alternatives like mt_endorse_agent or moltrust_reputation, nor when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.