Skip to main content
Glama

Òtítọ́

Models generate the change. Otito proves whether it is safe to merge.

CI npm license: MIT node Listed on mcpservers.org

otito demo

Otito is a local-first, deterministic, model-agnostic trust layer for AI-assisted development. It builds task-aware repository context before an agent edits, scores how much a change actually touches, and gates merge readiness against the exact staged tree — with no server, no account, and no code leaving the machine.

It does not replace Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, or any native agent harness. It runs beside them and keeps working as the models change underneath.

A passing local gate is never an automatic merge approval: hosted CI, GitHub review, CODEOWNERS, and the human release decision remain separate authorities.

Install

npm install -g @bashbop/otito
otito doctor

Or without installing: npx -y @bashbop/otito doctor.

Related MCP server: Graft

What it does

Rank what a change actually touches, from the request alone — no model, no embeddings, no network:

$ otito impact . "add refund handling to checkout" --top 3

  concepts: money flow

   1.  src/payment/checkout.service.ts    score 155
       |- role: required
       |- path matches: checkout
       |- symbol matches: checkout, refund
       |- concept match: money flow (×1.4 + 6.0)
       |- risk: money flow

   2.  src/payment/stripe.webhook.ts    score 6
       |- role: advisory
       |- concept match: money flow (×1.4 + 6.0)

Gate the exact staged tree, and say precisely why:

$ otito gate . --staged --base origin/main --request "add refund handling to checkout" --min-convergence 80

  [OK]    Changed files          1 changed file found.
  [OK]    Staged snapshot        Changed-file scope and convergence evidence are captured from the exact staged Git tree.
     |- Tree: 7d0b513dd256877d6bd309a6406468a9b1eaeedc
     |- Base: b776f04fcfbd02c8ce8d63e1a0c2450be58de039
  [OK]    Secret safety          No secret file paths and no credential values found in the changed content.
  [WARN]  Risk review            Risk-sensitive files changed; maintainer review should be explicit.
     |- src/payment/checkout.service.ts
  [OK]    Convergence            Task and diff satisfy the convergence requirement.
     |- Score: 100/100 (aligned)
     |- Receipt handle: rcpt_a8d31efae06e
     |- Subject tree: 7d0b513dd256877d6bd309a6406468a9b1eaeedc

  VERDICT  WARN

The convergence score is the part a model cannot grade for itself: it compares the stated intent against the files the diff actually changed, and produces a receipt bound to the exact base, parent, and staged-tree identity.

Everyday commands

Goal

Command

Inspect one repo

otito repo . --json

Build a code map

otito map . --json

Prepare task context for an agent

otito context "add a new MCP tool" --path .

Rank change blast radius

otito impact . "add refund handling" --top 12

Score intent vs. execution

otito converge "add refunds" --path . --base HEAD --staged

Gate an exact staged change

otito gate . --staged --run-validation

Gate a product change across repos

otito workspace-gate ../web ../api --request "ship change"

Review local changes

otito pr . --base origin/main --out .otito/pr-review.md

Index and search local projects

otito index ~/projects --discover then otito search "events controller"

Generate an agent harness

otito harness . --out .otito/harness.md

Run the MCP server

otito mcp

Score Agent Experience

otito ax . "add a new MCP tool"

Every command takes --json, and otito help lists the full set with flags.

MCP

Otito ships a stdio MCP server exposing 13 toolsrepo_inspect, repo_map, repo_index, repo_search, context_pack, change_impact, agent_experience, convergence_score, review_context, review_gate, review_verdict, workspace_report, and repo_harness.

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "otito": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@bashbop/otito", "mcp"]
    }
  }
}

Published in the MCP Registry as io.github.BASHBOP/otito. Repo-map lookups use an external per-user cache and never write into the inspected repository. Host-specific setup for Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Gemini CLI, and Kimi Code is in MCP and Agent Workflows.

How it compares

Approach

Strengths

Where otito differs

Sourcegraph / Cody context

Powerful hosted code search and embedding-based context across an org

Local-first and deterministic: no server, no account, no code leaves the machine, and the same query always yields the same packet

Hand-written CLAUDE.md / rules files

Curated, intent-rich guidance

Hand-written context goes stale; otito regenerates context from the actual code (symbols, imports, routes, tests) on every run and complements a short CLAUDE.md

grep / ripgrep

Fast, universal text matching

otito ranks whole files by task intent across paths, symbols, exports, and tests, then adds patterns and validation commands — a context packet, not a list of matching lines

Documentation

Full command reference, agent workflows, release process, evaluation method, and the design theses behind the trust layer:

bashbop.github.io/otito

Contributing

git clone https://github.com/BASHBOP/otito.git
cd otito && npm ci && npm run ci

npm run ci is the full gate: format, lint, typecheck, version check, tests, coverage floors (70% lines / 60% branches / 75% functions), three evaluation corpora, dependency audit, and a packaged-tarball smoke test. Run it before requesting review.

Start with CONTRIBUTING.md and the Code of Conduct. All changes need maintainer review; main requires passing gates and resolved conversations. Otito follows Semantic Versioning — say whether a PR is no-impact, patch, minor, or major.


Part of the toolchain

otito is one of four tools that form a deterministic trust layer for AI-assisted development. Each uses static analysis to answer a question people keep handing to an LLM.

  • otito (this tool), for context: what does this change actually touch?

  • tieline, for contracts: did the front end and back end quietly stop agreeing?

  • bouncer, for compliance: could you defend this to Ofcom?

  • aiglare, for governance: where can the model do something you can't undo?

More at segunolumbe.com. static analysis, never the model.

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Local-first code intelligence MCP server with hybrid BM25 + ONNX vector search, symbol-level impact analysis, diff-aware PR review with risk scoring, and persistent memory tied to git state.
    36
    64 npm
    79
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Local-first codebase context engine that parses code into a ranked dependency graph and serves it to AI tools via MCP for deep structural understanding.
    5
    15 npm
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Turn your codebase into AI context — entirely on your machine. Single-binary MCP server with AST parsing, call graph, and local embeddings.
    26
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Local-first MCP server that indexes all projects on your machine and provides coding agents with briefings about each project's stack, services, and run instructions, so they can start sessions with context across all repos. No cloud, no accounts, no telemetry.
    8 npm
    MIT