job-application-tracker-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to job-application-tracker-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude to organize a job search by registering openings, advancing applications through a status funnel, measuring conversion rates between stages, and flagging applications that have gone quiet and need follow-up. Data is kept locally in SQLite, so no external account or server is required.5MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceManages job applications, companies, roles, statuses, deadlines, and reminders through natural language queries.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables tracking of job applications and freelance leads through an MCP interface, with tools to add and update items, list and summarize the pipeline, flag stale entries, and draft follow-up messages grounded in each item's logged notes using locally stored JSON data.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA privacy-first MCP server for locally managing job, fellowship, and graduate-school applications. It offers tools for tracking application status, analyzing role fit, generating LaTeX CV/cover letters, interview prep, and discovering public jobs from ATS APIs.81MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables users to screen pasted job offers against a personal skills profile kept in local Markdown files, returning a fit verdict with evidence and deal-breakers while tallying missing skills into a recurring gap radar. It also tracks each offer through its application lifecycle and renders a one-page CV tailored to a specific offer from existing CV data, without scraping, network access, or its own AI.9MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude to record job applications in a local JSON file and then list them, change their status (applied, replied, interview, rejected, offer), and surface stale applications that need a follow-up. Requires no database or account, and validates every input so saves stay clean.41MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct action on the application lifecycle: create, change stage, view upcoming dates, and export. There is no plausible confusion between update_status and add_application since one requires an id and only mutates the stage. list_upcoming and export_report both read data but differ clearly in output shape and purpose.
All four tools follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern (add_application, update_status, list_upcoming, export_report). Verbs are distinct and predictable in meaning. No style mixing or vague naming.
Four tools is on the thin side but each earns its place in a small tracker workflow. The surface is intentionally minimal rather than padded with redundant operations. A slightly richer set (e.g. a get/list-all tool) would round it out without bloat.
Core create/update/view/export flows exist, but there is no way to list or fetch all applications directly, no delete/archive operation, and no way to edit company, role, deadline, or source after creation (only the stage and notes). Agents must use export_report as a workaround to see the full list, and cannot correct mistakes.