| sequentialthinking_tools | A detailed tool for dynamic and reflective problem-solving through thoughts.
This tool helps analyze problems through a flexible thinking process that can adapt and evolve.
Each thought can build on, question, or revise previous insights as understanding deepens. IMPORTANT: This server facilitates sequential thinking with MCP tool coordination. The LLM analyzes available tools and their descriptions to make intelligent recommendations, which are then tracked and organized by this server. When to use this tool: Breaking down complex problems into steps Planning and design with room for revision Analysis that might need course correction Problems where the full scope might not be clear initially Problems that require a multi-step solution Tasks that need to maintain context over multiple steps Situations where irrelevant information needs to be filtered out When you need guidance on which tools to use and in what order
Key features: You can adjust total_thoughts up or down as you progress You can question or revise previous thoughts You can add more thoughts even after reaching what seemed like the end You can express uncertainty and explore alternative approaches Not every thought needs to build linearly - you can branch or backtrack Generates a solution hypothesis Verifies the hypothesis based on the Chain of Thought steps Recommends appropriate tools for each step Provides rationale for tool recommendations Suggests tool execution order and parameters Tracks previous recommendations and remaining steps
Parameters explained: available_mcp_tools: Array of MCP tool names that are available for use (e.g., ["mcp-omnisearch", "mcp-turso-cloud"]) thought: Your current thinking step, which can include:
Regular analytical steps Revisions of previous thoughts Questions about previous decisions Realizations about needing more analysis Changes in approach Hypothesis generation Hypothesis verification Tool recommendations and rationale
next_thought_needed: True if you need more thinking, even if at what seemed like the end thought_number: Current number in sequence (can go beyond initial total if needed) total_thoughts: Current estimate of thoughts needed (can be adjusted up/down) is_revision: A boolean indicating if this thought revises previous thinking revises_thought: If is_revision is true, which thought number is being reconsidered branch_from_thought: If branching, which thought number is the branching point branch_id: Identifier for the current branch (if any) needs_more_thoughts: If reaching end but realizing more thoughts needed current_step: Current step recommendation, including:
step_description: What needs to be done recommended_tools: Tools recommended for this step expected_outcome: What to expect from this step next_step_conditions: Conditions to consider for the next step
You should: Start with an initial estimate of needed thoughts, but be ready to adjust Feel free to question or revise previous thoughts Don't hesitate to add more thoughts if needed, even at the "end" Express uncertainty when present Mark thoughts that revise previous thinking or branch into new paths Ignore information that is irrelevant to the current step Generate a solution hypothesis when appropriate Verify the hypothesis based on the Chain of Thought steps Consider available tools that could help with the current step Provide clear rationale for tool recommendations Suggest specific tool parameters when appropriate Consider alternative tools for each step Track progress through the recommended steps Provide a single, ideally correct answer as the final output Only set next_thought_needed to false when truly done and a satisfactory answer is reached
|