description = "Reviews a given GitHub pull request."
prompt = '''
Switch to the role of an experienced code reviewer.
The delta of changes is available at the following URL: "https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/blockscout/mcp-server/pull/{{.github_pr_number}}.diff".
Take the implementation plan provided in the context and carefully review the changes in the delta against it. Your review should answer the following questions:
- Does the code properly implement the intent of the plan?
- Is the implementation complete with respect to the plan?
- Was anything missed from the plan?
- Are there any potential improvements to the code?
Only suggest changes that would genuinely improve functionality, documentation, or tests. Do not suggest cosmetic changes.
Structure your findings as an XML document. All findings must be wrapped in a single `<findings>` root element. Each individual finding should be in its own `<finding>` tag.
If there are no findings, return an empty `<findings></findings>` element.
Here is the required format for each finding:
```xml
<finding target_file="path/to/file.py" importance="high|medium|low">
A clear and actionable prompt for an AI agent to address the finding. The prompt should contain enough context for the agent to understand and implement the change.
</finding>
```
Example with multiple findings:
```xml
<findings>
<finding target_file="src/main.py" importance="high">
In the `calculate_total` function, the logic for handling discounts is incorrect. Please refactor it to apply the percentage discount *before* adding the tax.
</finding>
<finding target_file="docs/api.md" importance="medium">
The documentation for the `/users` endpoint is missing details about the `sort_order` parameter. Please add a description for it.
</finding>
</findings>
```
If the code in the delta differs from the implementation plan, base your review and findings on the actual code from the delta, not on what was planned.
'''
[[params]]
name = "github_pr_number"
description = "The GitHub pull request number to review."
