Server Quality Checklist

Tool Scores

• get_local_timeA
  3.7/5.0
  Behavior3/5

  Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

  Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, indicating a safe read operation. The description adds value by specifying that the data comes from 'your local machine' and its purpose for assisting users, which provides useful context beyond the annotations. However, it does not disclose additional behavioral traits like performance or error handling.

  Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

  Conciseness5/5

  Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

  The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the core functionality and followed by a brief explanation of its utility. Every sentence adds value without redundancy, making it efficient and well-structured.

  Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

  Completeness4/5

  Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

  Given the tool's low complexity (0 parameters, read-only, with output schema), the description is complete enough for its purpose. It explains what the tool returns and why it's useful, and with an output schema present, it does not need to detail return values. However, it could be more explicit about sibling differentiation.

  Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

  Parameters4/5

  Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

  The input schema has 0 parameters with 100% coverage, so no parameter documentation is needed. The description does not mention parameters, which is appropriate. Baseline is 4 for zero parameters, as the description does not need to compensate for any gaps.

  Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

  Purpose4/5

  Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

  The description clearly states the tool's purpose with a specific verb ('Returns') and resource ('current local time and timezone information from your local machine'). It distinguishes from the sibling 'get_utc' by specifying 'local' time, though not explicitly naming the alternative. The description avoids tautology by explaining what the tool does rather than restating the name.

  Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

  Usage Guidelines3/5

  Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

  The description implies usage context by stating 'This helps you understand what time it is for the user you're assisting,' which suggests when to use it. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus the sibling 'get_utc' or provide any exclusions. The guidance is present but not comprehensive.

  Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

• get_utcA
  4.5/5.0
  Behavior4/5

  Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

  Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, indicating a safe read operation. The description adds useful context about accuracy ('accurate UTC time') and the universal time reference aspect, though it doesn't mention potential network dependencies or rate limits.

  Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

  Conciseness5/5

  Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

  The description is efficiently structured with three sentences that each add value: stating the core function, explaining the benefit, and clarifying the parameter. No wasted words.

  Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

  Completeness5/5

  Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

  Given the tool's simplicity (one optional parameter), presence of readOnlyHint annotation, and existence of an output schema, the description provides complete context for effective use without needing to explain return values.

  Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

  Parameters4/5

  Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

  With 0% schema description coverage, the description compensates by explaining the 'server' parameter's purpose ('NTP server address') and default value, adding meaningful semantics beyond the bare schema.

  Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

  Purpose5/5

  Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

  The description clearly states the specific action ('Returns accurate UTC time') and resource ('from an NTP server'), distinguishing it from the sibling tool 'get_local_time' by emphasizing universal time reference regardless of local timezone.

  Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

  Usage Guidelines4/5

  Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

  The description provides clear context for when to use this tool ('provides a universal time reference regardless of local timezone'), which implicitly differentiates it from 'get_local_time', but doesn't explicitly state when not to use it or name alternatives.

  Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.