Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It states 'build an unsigned vote tx' but does not disclose permissions, side effects (likely none), or what to do with the output. Lacks details on the transactional flow.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, efficient and to the point. Could be slightly more structured but not wasteful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (4 params, no output schema, many siblings), the description is too minimal. It doesn't explain what an unsigned tx is, how to use the built transaction, or how this fits in the multisig workflow.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is high (75%) and description restates the vote and transactionIndex purpose but adds no new meaning beyond schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it builds an unsigned vote transaction to approve or reject a proposal at a given transactionIndex. The verb 'build' and resource 'vote tx' are specific, and it distinguishes from siblings like execute tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies this tool is for creating an unsigned vote, and that there is an execute counterpart, but does not explicitly state when to use this vs alternatives or provide a workflow hint.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.