solknife_ct_orphans_list
List a wallet's orphan ZK Proof context-state accounts (left by partial Withdraw or Transfer sagas).
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| owner | Yes | A Solana address in base58, 32-44 chars. |
List a wallet's orphan ZK Proof context-state accounts (left by partial Withdraw or Transfer sagas).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| owner | Yes | A Solana address in base58, 32-44 chars. |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description should convey behavioral traits. It only says 'List', implying read-only, but does not state side effects, permissions, or error behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no fluff, front-loads the key action and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple tool (one param, no output schema), the description covers the core functionality but could briefly note return format or ordering.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and its parameter description is adequate. The tool description adds no extra semantics beyond 'wallet's' which is implied.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (List), the resource (orphan ZK Proof context-state accounts), and the context (left by partial Withdraw or Transfer sagas), distinguishing it from siblings.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies when to use (to find orphan accounts) but does not explicitly state when not to use or mention alternative tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.