Skip to main content
Glama

Historical Weather Statistics

get_weather_history
Read-only

Returns historical weather statistics for a location and business type, with limitations. Official Anthropic connector IP ranges share 100 free calls per day; official OpenAI connector IP ranges share a separate 100. Other IP addresses receive 10 free calls per day. A combined 300-free-call daily cap covers all pools, including cached results. Resets at midnight UTC; additional calls require $0.10 Solana USDC via x402. Always show the licensing_disclosure to the user verbatim with any results from this tool. Do not comment on insurance pricing, premiums, or whether coverage is advisable.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
locationYesCity and state of the business, e.g. 'Tampa, FL' or 'Kansas City, MO'.
business_typeYesCaller-provided business category for context only, not business-specific loss modeling.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / business_type / enum
      Previous value: -[
      -  "restaurant",
      -  "car_wash",
      -  "retail",
      -  "agriculture",
      -  "event_venue"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "restaurant",
      +  "car_wash",
      +  "retail",
      +  "agriculture",
      +  "event_venue",
      +  "golf_course",
      +  "construction",
      +  "hotel",
      +  "resort",
      +  "marina",
      +  "boat_rental",
      +  "winery",
      +  "vineyard",
      +  "hoa_condo",
      +  "landscaping",
      +  "tour_operator",
      +  "outdoor_retail",
      +  "casino",
      +  "real_estate",
      +  "property_management",
      +  "food_truck",
      +  "delivery_service",
      +  "logistics",
      +  "solar_farm",
      +  "other"
      +]
  2. Added

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, but the description adds substantial behavioral context: tiered free-call quotas, a combined 300-call cap, UTC reset, paid calls via USDC, required licensing disclosure, and content restrictions. It does not describe the actual return format or historical coverage, but the rate/cost/legal behavior is unusually well disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose is front-loaded, but the description is then dominated by lengthy quota, payment, and legal-disclosure text. Those details are relevant, yet the structure emphasizes operational terms over what the statistics contain. It is informative but not tightly concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has only two parameters and no output schema, so the description should clarify what historical statistics are returned, such as time range, metrics, or output shape. Instead it focuses almost entirely on quotas, payment, and legal constraints. Core return behavior remains underspecified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the schema documents both parameters, including the business_type enum and its 'context only' caveat. The description mentions location and business type but adds no meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: returns historical weather statistics for a location and business type. The phrase 'with limitations' is vague, but the core purpose is clear. No sibling tools exist, so sibling differentiation is not applicable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides operational constraints such as free-call quotas, paid overage, licensing disclosure, and a restriction on insurance commentary. However, it does not explicitly say when to use this tool versus alternatives or when not to use it. With no sibling tools, the guidance is implied rather than complete.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources