Skip to main content
Glama

quote_movers

Read-only

Community tokens and official stablecoins ranked by send count. Returns the x402 payment quote for this read (price, network, asset, pay-to, and the exact URL). It does not return data. To buy, GET the returned URL over HTTP and pay with x402; check get_x402_health first.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "quote_movers"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses a critical non-obvious trait: this call does not return data and only returns a payment quote, which must then be paid over HTTP. Annotations only say readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, so the description adds the essential context about cost, the payment requirement, and the two-step workflow.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is three tight sentences, with the scope stated first and the non-obvious 'does not return data' warning placed before the follow-up instructions. No sentence is redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description still enumerates the response fields (price, network, asset, pay-to, exact URL), and it explains the prerequisite health check and the follow-up payment step. An agent has everything needed to call this tool and act on the result.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, so 4 is the baseline score. The description does not need to explain any inputs, and the schema covers the object shape fully.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: it ranks community tokens and official stablecoins by send count, and returns an x402 payment quote rather than data. It is clear, but sibling differentiation is only implicit; it does not explain how this differs from quote_prices, search_tokens, or the other quote_* tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives a concrete follow-up procedure: send an HTTP GET to the returned URL and pay with x402, and check get_x402_health first. It does not state when to choose this over related quote_ or search tools, but the usage context is unambiguous.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources