Skip to main content
Glama

list_wallets

Read-only
Browse the wallets CabalSpy tracks for a chain and wallet type. Use this to

answer which KOLs or smart money wallets are covered at all. Always pass a

limit; the full list runs into the thousands.



blockchain: solana, bnb, base, eth or rh

wallet_type: kol, smart or whale

limit: wallets per page (default 50)

cursor: pagination cursor from the previous response

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoHow many entries to return. Keep it small: large results are trimmed to fit the context window anyway.
cursorNoPagination cursor taken from the previous response. Leave empty for the first page.
blockchainYesBlockchain. One of: solana, bnb, base, eth, rh. solana has kol, smart and whale wallets; bnb, base and rh have kol and smart; eth has kol only. rh is Robinhood Chain, an Ethereum L2.
wallet_typeYesWallet type. kol is a Key Opinion Leader, an influencer whose calls move markets. smart is a wallet selected for its track record. whale is a large holder, Solana only.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed7 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / blockchain / description
      Added value: +"Blockchain. One of: solana, bnb, base, eth, rh. solana has kol, smart and whale wallets; bnb, base and rh have kol and smart; eth has kol only. rh is Robinhood Chain, an Ethereum L2."
    • addedInput schema / properties / cursor / description
      Added value: +"Pagination cursor taken from the previous response. Leave empty for the first page."
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Added value: +"How many entries to return. Keep it small: large results are trimmed to fit the context window anyway."
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit / maximum
      Added value: +200
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit / minimum
      Added value: +1
    • addedInput schema / properties / wallet_type / description
      Added value: +"Wallet type. kol is a Key Opinion Leader, an influencer whose calls move markets. smart is a wallet selected for its track record. whale is a large holder, Solana only."
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "title": "list_walletsDictOutput",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Changed7 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / blockchain / description
      Removed value: -"Blockchain network: solana, bnb, base or eth."
    • removedInput schema / properties / blockchain / examples
      Removed value: -[
      -  "solana"
      -]
    • removedInput schema / properties / cursor / description
      Removed value: -"Pagination cursor from the previous response. Omit for the first page."
    • removedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Removed value: -"Max number of wallets per page."
    • removedInput schema / properties / wallet_type / description
      Removed value: -"Wallet category: kol, smart or whale."
    • removedInput schema / properties / wallet_type / examples
      Removed value: -[
      -  "kol"
      -]
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -{
      -  "additionalProperties": true,
      -  "title": "list_walletsDictOutput",
      -  "type": "object"
      -}New value: +null
  3. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, which align with the 'Browse' verb. The description adds behavioral context: pagination via cursor, explanation of wallet types per chain (e.g., eth only has kol), and the warning about large result sets.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences plus a parameter list. It is front-loaded with purpose and usage. The parameter list is somewhat redundant with the schema, but overall it remains compact and informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the output schema exists, the description need not explain return values. It covers purpose, usage guidelines, parameter details, and pagination. No gaps remain for an agent to invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds value by emphasizing the limit parameter ('Always pass a limit'), detailing which wallet types exist per blockchain, and clarifying the cursor's purpose. This goes beyond the schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool browses wallets tracked by CabalSpy for a given chain and wallet type, specifically to check coverage of KOLs, smart money, or whale wallets. This verb ('Browse') and resource ('wallets') combination distinguishes it from sibling tools like compare_wallets or get_wallet_holdings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description advises to always pass a limit due to potentially large lists, and implies this tool is for browsing available wallets. While it doesn't explicitly state when not to use or name alternative tools, the context makes the intended use clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources