wallet-tracker

compare_wallets

Read-only

Statistics for up to 100 wallets in a single request. Much cheaper than calling

get_wallet_tracker repeatedly. Use when the user names several wallets, or to

follow up on a leaderboard.



blockchain: solana, bnb, base, eth or rh

addresses: up to 100 wallet addresses

wallet_type: kol, smart or whale (default kol)

period: 6h, 1d, 7d or 30d (default 7d)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`period`	No	Statistics window: 6h, 1d, 7d or 30d. Longer windows return far more data and get trimmed harder, so prefer the shortest window that answers the question.	7d
`addresses`	Yes	Up to 100 wallet addresses. Far cheaper than calling get_wallet_tracker once per wallet.
`blockchain`	Yes	Blockchain. One of: solana, bnb, base, eth, rh. solana has kol, smart and whale wallets; bnb, base and rh have kol and smart; eth has kol only. rh is Robinhood Chain, an Ethereum L2.
`wallet_type`	No	Wallet type. kol is a Key Opinion Leader, an influencer whose calls move markets. smart is a wallet selected for its track record. whale is a large holder, Solana only.	kol

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No arguments

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, and the description aligns with these. It adds context beyond annotations, such as data trimming for longer periods and advising shortest window for best results.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (few sentences plus parameter list) with no wasted words. It is front-loaded with purpose and usage, then parameter details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given an output schema exists (not shown), the description need not explain return values. It covers performance (cheaper than get_wallet_tracker), parameter constraints, and usage tips. Could mention comparative nature but output schema likely covers that.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds meaning beyond schema by explaining wallet_type definitions, per-blockchain wallet availability, and period trimming behavior, which aids correct invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool compares up to 100 wallets in a single request, using specific words like 'statistics' and 'compare'. It also distinguishes from sibling tool 'get_wallet_tracker' by noting cost efficiency.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'Use when the user names several wallets, or to follow up on a leaderboard', providing clear when-to-use context. It implies not to use for single wallets but does not explicitly state exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All wallet-tracker tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct function—comparing tokens vs. wallets, detecting bundles, retrieving historical vs. current signals, etc. Overlap is minimal, and descriptions clearly differentiate similar-sounding tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (compare_, detect_, get_, list_, lookup_), all in snake_case, making it easy to predict and understand the purpose of each tool.

Tool Count4/5

With 21 tools, the set is slightly above the typical 'well-scoped' range, but the breadth of functionality—covering wallet stats, tokens, signals, bundles, and comparisons across multiple blockchains—warrants the number. No tool feels redundant.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers essentially all aspects of wallet tracking: browsing, per-wallet stats/history/holdings/connections, token-level analysis, signals, bundles, leaderboards, and activity metrics. No obvious gaps for the stated purpose.

Resources

Need Help?