Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

wallet-tracker

by xyz.cabalspy
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

compare_tokens

Read-only
Statistics for up to 100 tokens in a single request. Use for shortlists, or to
follow up on the most-traded analytics view.

blockchain: solana, bnb, base, eth or rh
mints: up to 100 token addresses
wallet_type: kol, smart or whale (default kol)

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
mintsYesUp to 100 token addresses. Use for shortlists, or to follow up on the most_traded analytics view.
blockchainYesBlockchain. One of: solana, bnb, base, eth, rh. solana has kol, smart and whale wallets; bnb, base, eth and rh have kol and smart. rh is Robinhood Chain, an Ethereum L2.
wallet_typeNoWallet type. kol is a Key Opinion Leader, an influencer whose calls move markets. smart is a wallet selected for its track record. whale is a large holder, Solana only.kol

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / blockchain / description
      Previous value: -"Blockchain. One of: solana, bnb, base, eth, rh. solana has kol, smart and whale wallets; bnb, base and rh have kol and smart; eth has kol only. rh is Robinhood Chain, an Ethereum L2."New value: +"Blockchain. One of: solana, bnb, base, eth, rh. solana has kol, smart and whale wallets; bnb, base, eth and rh have kol and smart. rh is Robinhood Chain, an Ethereum L2."
  2. Changed5 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / blockchain / description
      Added value: +"Blockchain. One of: solana, bnb, base, eth, rh. solana has kol, smart and whale wallets; bnb, base and rh have kol and smart; eth has kol only. rh is Robinhood Chain, an Ethereum L2."
    • addedInput schema / properties / mints / description
      Added value: +"Up to 100 token addresses. Use for shortlists, or to follow up on the most_traded analytics view."
    • addedInput schema / properties / mints / maxItems
      Added value: +100
    • addedInput schema / properties / wallet_type / description
      Added value: +"Wallet type. kol is a Key Opinion Leader, an influencer whose calls move markets. smart is a wallet selected for its track record. whale is a large holder, Solana only."
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": true,
+  "title": "compare_tokensDictOutput",
+  "type": "object"
+}
  3. Added

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds the 100-token batch constraint and the default wallet_type, but does not describe what 'statistics' actually contains, rate limits, or behavior on invalid mints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads the purpose sentence, then lists parameters compactly. Minimal waste, though the parameter list partially duplicates schema content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return values needn't be explained, and annotations cover the safety profile. The description plus structured fields give an agent enough to call it correctly, though the nature of the returned statistics remains unspecified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all three parameters, including the blockchain list, wallet_type meaning, and defaults. The description largely restates those same enumerated values without adding syntax or format detail.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific resource (token statistics) and a clear scope (up to 100 tokens per request), which distinguishes it from the single-token get_token_stats sibling. However it doesn't explicitly frame the 'comparison' angle that the name implies, leaving a small gap.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives two concrete usage contexts: 'shortlists' and following up on the most-traded analytics view. It doesn't name a specific alternative tool or list exclusions, so it stops short of full guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All wallet-tracker toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources