Skip to main content
Glama

Finder Jobs

Get vacancy

get_vacancy
Read-onlyIdempotent

Get details of one vacancy by its Finder id (from search_vacancies). For Russia pass country="ru" (ids from finder.work): title, employer, city, salary, description (up to 1500 chars) and the finder.work page url where the user can apply.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesVacancy id from search_vacancies results
countryNoPass 'ru' for Russian (finder.work) vacancies; leave empty for other countries

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idNo
urlNo
cityNo
errorNo
titleNo
activeNo
salaryNo
countryNo
excerptNo
employerNo
posted_atNo
workplaceNo
experienceNo
descriptionNo
employment_typeNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / country
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": "",
      +  "description": "Pass 'ru' for Russian (finder.work) vacancies; leave empty for other countries",
      +  "title": "Country",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / id / description
      Added value: +"Vacancy id from search_vacancies results"
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "properties": {
      +    "active": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "boolean"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ],
      +      "default": null,
      +      "title": "Active"
      +    },
      +    "city": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ],
      +      "default": null,
      +      "title": "City"
      +    },
      +    "country": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ],
      +      "default": null,
      +      "title": "Country"
      +    },
      +    "description": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ],
      +      "default": null,
      +      "title": "Description"
      +    },
      +    "employer": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ],
      +      "default": null,
      +      "title": "Employer"
      +    },
      +    "employment_type": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ],
      +      "default": null,
      +      "title": "Employment Type"
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ],
      +      "default": null,
      +      "title": "Error"
      +    },
      +    "excerpt": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ],
      +      "default": null,
      +      "title": "Excerpt"
      +    },
      +    "experience": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ],
      +      "default": null,
      +      "title": "Experience"
      +    },
      +    "id": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "integer"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ],
      +      "default": null,
      +      "title": "Id"
      +    },
      +    "posted_at": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ],
      +      "default": null,
      +      "title": "Posted At"
      +    },
      +    "salary": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ],
      +      "default": null,
      +      "title": "Salary"
      +    },
      +    "title": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ],
      +      "default": null,
      +      "title": "Title"
      +    },
      +    "url": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ],
      +      "default": null,
      +      "title": "Url"
      +    },
      +    "workplace": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ],
      +      "default": null,
      +      "title": "Workplace"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "title": "VacancyDetails",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive and closed-world, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds useful substance about the returned payload (title, employer, city, salary, description capped at 1500 chars, and an apply URL), though an output schema exists, so this is additive but modest.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single dense sentence that front-loads the core action and id source, with the Russia-specific rule and return contents following. Slightly packed, but every clause carries information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema, annotations, and fully documented params, the description only needs to add the id provenance and country nuance, which it does. Minor gaps remain (no error behavior for an invalid id, no explicit statement that country only affects Russian listings' source), keeping it from a 5.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both parameters are already documented in the schema; the description merely restates the id origin and the 'ru' country rule. Baseline 3 is appropriate since the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource (get details of ONE vacancy) and implicitly contrasts with the sibling search_vacancies by naming it as the id source, so an agent can tell retrieval-by-id apart from search. The scope is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives the prerequisite (id must come from search_vacancies) and the conditional rule for the country parameter ('ru' for Russia, empty otherwise), which is clear usage context. It does not state when NOT to use it or name an alternative retrieval path, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources