Skip to main content
Glama

create_utility_account

Create once with an optional unique username (3–48 letters/digits/_/-); omit it to use the stable account ID. Immediately save the private API key and reuse it for every utility request. Identity follows the key; username is a self-declared private label, not a login or recovery credential. Read utility_account to resume; never create a fresh account for each task. 500-credit monthly balance top-up through December 2026; read pricing for current policy. No automatic billing or health registration.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "create_utility_account"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
usernameNo

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / username
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "title": "Username"
      +}
  2. Added

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only declare it is a non-destructive write with open-world scope; the description goes well beyond by disclosing the key-handling contract (save the private API key immediately, identity follows the key), that username is not a login or recovery credential, and the credit/billing posture (500-credit monthly top-up, no automatic billing, no health registration). These are exactly the behavioral facts an agent cannot get from the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the verb, the one-time constraint, and the key-handling imperative, and each sentence is substantive. The credit-policy sentence ('500-credit monthly balance top-up through December 2026') is tangentially related, date-bound, and will go stale, which slightly dilutes an otherwise tight definition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter creation tool whose annotations already cover the safety profile and which has an output schema covering returns, the description supplies everything else an agent needs: one-time-use rule, key persistence, identity model, and how to resume.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description carries the full burden and does: it constrains format (3–48 chars, letters/digits/_/-) and explains the semantics of omission (falls back to the stable account ID). It also clarifies that the value is a self-declared private label rather than an identity credential.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Create ... account') plus scope ('once') and names the sibling that handles resumption ('Read utility_account to resume'), so the agent can distinguish it from utility_account and set_utility_identity without opening any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit when-to-use ('create once', omit username for default), explicit when-not ('never create a fresh account for each task'), and the alternative ('Read utility_account to resume'). Nothing is left to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources