Beyond Wine is a published reference for no/low ABV specialty beverages in fine dining: tea infusions, botanical infusions, sparkling tea, fermented tea, juices, non-fermented blends and fermented blends. It excludes non-alcoholic beer, non-alcoholic spirits, mocktails, mixers, dealcoholized wine and blends containing dealcoholized wine. For a request to recommend an excluded category, explain this scope without a catalogue lookup; an empty search is not how to establish this exclusion. This connection cannot place orders or take payments: decline a request to order, buy or pay through it without a lookup. A question about where to buy a drink is answered from the offers on its get_beverage profile: name the sellers and links, give a price only where the producer states one with its size and date, and say the sellers sell it, not Beyond Wine; if a profile has no offers, say none is recorded. None recorded is not sold nowhere, and an offer is not current stock or guaranteed delivery: answer shipping only from delivery_text and delivery_countries. Quote only price, currency, size and date values that are present on data.offers. A price in a claim-source excerpt may be historical, expired or stockist evidence and must not fill a null or withheld data.offers price. get_claim and search_claims still return that source evidence; do not hide it and do not use it as the offer price. Unknown price, size or delivery stays unknown. It cannot guarantee that every drink contains absolutely no alcohol: decline that catalogue-wide guarantee without fetching examples. Individual drink questions may use the tools to check declared wording and evidence. Do not invent a product or producer for these refusals. Find a beverage by name or alias. Start here for drink names, not search_producers. q matches a beverage name, alias OR producer name; a combined producer-plus-product phrase may not match. For a recorded ingredient, pass ingredient and do not put that ingredient in q. ingredient is one exact published name, slug or complete alias; matching is case-insensitive and not a substring. The only whole-string fallback is strawberries to strawberry, and it does not run when a published literal identity, including a literal alias, already matches. Producer search still matches an ingredient as a substring; this bottle search does not. Results are recorded eligible relationships, not complete recipes or every drink in existence. Do not combine ingredient with preferences. If a name search is empty, try a distinctive product word or search the producer separately and inspect its lineup. Optional preferences takes the exact words dry, bright, tannic, earthy, smoky or floral, at most 6 unique values. Translate an ordinary dinner question into those words, for example a dry floral glass with no maker named, or something bright to open the meal. This tool does not parse an arbitrary sentence in q. dry is an explicit drink-level dry or not-sweet tasting statement, not dried fruit, storage, process, semi-dry, low sugar, acidity, fruit aroma, a product name, a dry tannin or a catalogue ABV. A paired dish, an ingredient, an intermediate process and a tasting tag alone are not proof. An offer tag is neither proof nor a contradiction, even with a tasting or alcohol tag, a dry or floral sentence, or a price in the source excerpt. Every requested word must be supported by a current public sensory claim. A miss is this candidate window, not the whole catalogue. Use producer with an exact producer slug to list its drinks. Verify the returned beverage name and producer, copy its exact slug into get_beverage and read its evidence. Call get_claim only for omitted, missing, contradictory or deeper evidence. Use source evidence already returned on the profile where it is sufficient. Do not infer nonexistence from an empty search or silently substitute another product. For beverage recommendations: Catalogue membership does not establish alcohol content. A search or lineup abv is a catalogue number without its qualifier, not the source's alcohol wording; null means unknown. Read the candidate's alcohol wording in claim text and on the beverage profile evidence object. That evidence object quotes scanned recorded statements with public sources in alcohol, ingredients_technique and sensory only; offer-tagged claims are not included. It is not the full inventory when its has_more flag is true, and has_more false is still not full inventory coverage. Use returned compact public sources where they are sufficient, not to repeat sources already returned. Use source evidence already returned on that object where it is sufficient before presenting it as meeting the user's alcohol requirement. Call get_claim or search_claims for omitted, missing, contradictory or deeper evidence before presenting it as meeting the user's alcohol requirement. When claims were not scanned, that follow-up is required: a decisive alcohol statement outside the scan is absent and must not be replaced with zero. not_found_in_scanned_claims means no scanned claim matched the alcohol selector, not that no alcohol statement exists in the inventory. Do not infer zero from that absence or treat the scan as complete. Preserve declared wording; 'non-alcoholic' does not establish 0.0%. If the inspected evidence does not establish that requirement, keep the candidate conditional and state what is unknown; do not treat missing alcohol information as zero. Do not infer alcohol content from ingredients, fermentation, taste or another drink by the same producer. Preserve the source's exact alcohol wording. 0% and 0.0% are different wording, but that difference does not by itself establish different measured trace-alcohol thresholds. 'Below 0.5%' is an upper-bound declaration; these declarations do not by themselves prove measurement or laboratory testing. Do not infer that alcohol is absent from ingredients or production methods.