quiz_video_delete_quiz_hookDelete a single hook from a quiz.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| hookId | Yes | Numeric id of the hook to delete. | |
| quizId | Yes | Quiz ID in YouTube-style 11-character base64url format. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate destructive=true and readOnly=false, so the description adds no additional behavioral context beyond what is already structured. It does not disclose permanence, side effects, or any specifics beyond the basic delete operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, front-loaded, with no fluff or redundant words. It is appropriately sized for the tool's simplicity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity, full parameter schema, and annotations that cover safety, the description is sufficient. It lacks any mention of return value or deletion scope, but these are not critical given the context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has 100% coverage with descriptions for both quizId and hookId, so the schema already documents the parameters. The description adds no extra meaning beyond restating that the target is a single hook from a quiz.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete a single hook from a quiz' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like create, update, or list. The title and description are aligned and unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The usage is implied by the action: it is used when the intent is to remove a hook. However, there is no explicit guidance on when to prefer this over create/update/list, or any mention of prerequisites or restrictions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Every tool targets a distinct resource and action (create/get/list/update/delete per entity). Overlapping pairs like get_render vs download_render are clearly differentiated by their purpose, and generate_quiz vs create_quiz serve different creation modes. There is no ambiguity between tools.
The vast majority of tools follow a consistent 'quiz_video_<verb>_<noun>' pattern in snake_case. The only deviation is the three discovery tools (get_api_catalog, get_llms_txt, get_openapi_spec) which omit the 'quiz_video_' prefix, though they still use a clear verb_noun structure.
With 30 tools, the server is on the heavier side and exceeds the typical 15-tool guideline. However, the count is justified by the breadth of resources covered (quizzes, questions, hooks, templates, flashcard decks, renders, music, account) and each tool has a distinct role, so the size feels appropriate for a comprehensive API surface.
The server covers full CRUD for most core resources (quizzes, templates, flashcard decks, hooks) and add/list for questions. Minor gaps include no individual question update/delete and no direct render deletion, but these are not critical and the main workflows (create → view → render → download) are fully covered.