Skip to main content
Glama

x402-power-v-i

Power V I: Power of v i.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
currentNoCurrent to process
voltageNoVoltage to process

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / current
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Current to process",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / voltage
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Voltage to process",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

D1.4/5.0
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses nothing about behavior, side effects, or output. This is a complete gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short, but it is not concise in a useful way. It is under-specified rather than efficient, failing to convey any meaning beyond the name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Without annotations or an output schema, the description must be complete. It is entirely inadequate for a tool with two parameters, leaving the agent unable to determine what the tool does or when to use it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 100% description coverage for both parameters, so the baseline is 3. The description is not expected to add much, but it also doesn't clarify the relationship between the parameters or the expected units.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Power V I: Power of v i' is a restatement of the tool's name and title, not a statement of what the tool does. It's a tautology that provides no actionable meaning about the operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With no context, an agent cannot know if this is a calculator for electrical power, a string operation, or something else.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources