Skip to main content
Glama

pen_howto

Give the step-by-step injection walkthrough for a GLP-1 pen (Mounjaro KwikPen, Wegovy, Ozempic or Saxenda), from the maker's UK instructions. Returns the ordered steps and the symptom list you can troubleshoot. Routes to the leaflet; not a substitute for it.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "pen": "<pen>"
    },
    "name": "pen_howto"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
penYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden. It discloses that the output contains ordered steps and a symptom list, credits the maker's UK instructions, and explains the leaflet relationship and limitation. It could say more about whether the content is read-only or how it handles missing pen variants, but the key behavior is clear.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three compact sentences, front-loads the main action, then states the return contents and scope limitation. Every sentence adds useful information with no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter, no-output-schema tool, the definition explains what the tool returns, where the content comes from, and a key limitation. The main remaining gap is sibling overlap with pen_troubleshoot, which is not resolved in the description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It does so by naming the four supported pens, including Mounjaro KwikPen, and tying them to the maker's UK instructions, which adds brand-level meaning beyond the lowercase enum values.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: it gives a step-by-step injection walkthrough for named GLP-1 pens from UK manufacturer instructions. It is clear what the tool does, but it does not explicitly distinguish itself from the sibling pen_troubleshoot, even though it mentions a symptom list you can troubleshoot.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use it (when an injection walkthrough for one of the four pens is needed) and includes a scope disclaimer that it routes to the leaflet and is not a substitute. However, it gives no explicit when-not-use guidance or direction to alternatives such as pen_troubleshoot for troubleshooting.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources