Skip to main content
Glama

Get fills (trade history)

get_fills
Read-only

Get executed fills for the subaccount, including price, size, fee and maker/taker liquidity.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNo
limitNo
marketNoMarket ticker filter, e.g. BTC-USD

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations provide readOnlyHint=true, matching description. Description adds data fields but no extra behavioral context like pagination or ordering.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, efficient, and front-loaded. Could improve with structured listing of returned fields.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Missing pagination details, ordering, subaccount specification. No output schema. Significant gaps for accurate invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Description does not describe any parameters. Schema has 3 params with only market having a description (33% coverage). No parameter meaning added.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it retrieves executed fills with specific data fields (price, size, fee, liquidity). Distinct from siblings like get_open_orders or get_positions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implied usage for subaccount trade history, but no explicit when-to-use or alternatives. Does not differentiate from get_balance, get_pnl, etc.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources