Wanhe AI Compliance Checker
Server Details
AI content compliance: ad-law prohibited words, AI labeling GB45438, EU AI Act Art50, SB1000
The last two health checks of this connector failed. If this server requires authentication, missing or expired test credentials may be the cause. A test profile lets Glama authenticate for health checks and discover tools; it is separate from your personal connections.
If you are the author, claim ownership, then add or update a test profile under Admin → Test Profile.
- Status
- Unhealthy
- Uptime
- 0.0% over the last 24 hours
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- ChatGPT
- –
- Claude
- –
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools target clearly different regulatory domains: check_ai_label detects AI-generated/synthetic content expressions and labeling duties, while check_content audits advertising-law risks. Their scopes, outputs, and legal bases are explicitly distinguished, so an agent can pick the right one without confusion.
Both names follow the same check_<subject> verb_noun convention (check_ai_label, check_content) in snake_case with no stylistic drift. The pattern is predictable and scales cleanly if more checks are added.
Two tools is thin for a server billing itself as a Compliance Checker; the surface covers only two rule families. It is borderline rather than mismatched, since each tool is substantive and earns its place.
The service is stateless so CRUD does not apply, but for a 'compliance checker' the coverage is narrow: no data-privacy (PIPL), platform-content, or other regulatory checks, and no batch or rule-listing operation. The two provided checks appear internally complete (problem list, legal basis, suggested fix, explicit 'no issue' handling).
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Loading tool schema changelog…
Related MCP Connectors
中文内容合规检查:广告法违禁词 + AI 标识规则,逐条给出法条依据。Chinese content compliance: ad-law banned terms + AI labeling.
AI legal compliance: contract review, risk scoring, EU/CN AI act, watermark check. 8 MCP tools.
AI inventory and EU AI Act compliance. Find AI tools and use cases, check new AI uses before launch.
Korea AI Basic Act compliance MCP — in force 22 Jan 2026. High-impact AI + GenAI labelling + MSIT
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to check Chinese commercial content for advertising-law prohibited terms, AI-generated-content labeling requirements, and 17-item organizational compliance self-assessment, returning each hit with its location, cited legal basis, and revision suggestion. Runs fully offline with a deterministic rule engine and zero external dependencies.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables scanning e-commerce advertising content to detect prohibited claims and trademark violations, returning deterministic compliance evaluations for autonomous agents.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables automated evaluation of e-commerce advertising content against compliance policies, detecting prohibited claims and trademarks through an MCP-compatible interface.8-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceDeterministic compliance audit for cross-border e-commerce listings (Amazon, Temu, TikTok Shop): banned words, promo words, absolute claims, certification and trademark risks, and 2026 AI content disclosure. Versioned YAML rule packs, three-level obfuscation-resistant matching, exit-code CI gate and SARIF output. No LLM involved in judging.410 npmMIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.