Skip to main content
Glama

Ballast - Cold Email

Pause campaign

pause_campaign

Pause a running campaign. Nothing more is sent until it is launched again. Emails already handed to the provider still arrive.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "pause_campaign"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only establish non-read-only and non-destructive; the description adds the meaningful behavior: sending halts until relaunch, and already-delivered emails still arrive. That in-flight delivery nuance is exactly the kind of side effect an agent needs. Missing only auth/prerequisite and idempotency details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, front-loaded with the action, and every sentence carries distinct information (state change, sending halt, in-flight email caveat). Nothing is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter mutation with no output schema, the description covers the state transition and its delivery side effect well. The remaining gap is the 'id' parameter's meaning and whether pausing an already-paused campaign is an error or a no-op.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is one required parameter, 'id', with 0% schema description coverage and no mention in the description. An agent can infer it is the campaign id, but the definition neither confirms that nor describes the accepted format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource (pause a running campaign) and constrains it to a 'running' campaign, which rules out draft states. It is unambiguous against siblings like launch_campaign and update_campaign, though it never names them explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the phrase 'running campaign' and by the mention of relaunching, which hints at launch_campaign as the counterpart. However, there is no explicit when-to-use / when-not-to-use guidance versus update_campaign or launch_campaign.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources