Skip to main content
Glama

Venue guide: bags, entry, parking, food

venue_info
Read-onlyIdempotent

What to know before going to a venue, from UPFRONT's venue guide: the bag policy and what fans can bring, gates and entry, parking, getting there by transit or rideshare, and food and drink, including what the guide says about gluten-free, vegetarian or vegan, halal and kosher food. Matches questions like "what's the bag policy at MetLife?", "when do doors open at MSG?" or "where do I park for Lambeau?".

venue: the venue's name ("MetLife Stadium", "MSG", "Lumen Field, Seattle"). topics: optional; only these parts, at more length: any of "bags", "entry", "parking", "transit", "food". Without it, every part.

Covers the 36 stadiums, arenas and amphitheaters UPFRONT has a guide for; for any other venue the answer says so and lists the ones with guides.

Each part is the guide's own words ("text", plus the guide's "faq" questions and answers). factsLastChecked is the date UPFRONT last checked the guide's facts; rules can change for a single event, and the venue's own event page has the final word. guideUrl is the guide on UPFRONT. dietary lists what the guide says per diet; dietaryNotMentioned lists diets the guide doesn't cover, which doesn't mean the venue has nothing for them.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
venueYes
topicsNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish read-only, idempotent, non-destructive behavior, and the description adds useful context beyond them: answers are the guide's own words, include FAQ text, factsLastChecked freshness, guideUrl, and caveats that rules can change per event and the venue's own page is final. It also clarifies dietaryNotMentioned semantics, which is important for correct interpretation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with purpose, then examples, parameter definitions, coverage limits, and return-field semantics. Despite being detailed, every section serves a clear function for a guide-lookup tool with several caveats.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, so the description explains return content sufficiently: guide text, FAQ questions and answers, factsLastChecked, guideUrl, dietary lists, and dietaryNotMentioned. It also covers venue coverage limits and freshness caveats, which are essential for correct use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must carry parameter meaning. It does: venue is the venue's name with examples like "MetLife Stadium" and "MSG"; topics is optional and accepts only bags, entry, parking, transit, or food, with all topics returned when omitted.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific resource and scope: what fans need to know before going to a venue, including bag policy, entry, parking, transit, food and drink, and dietary options. It clearly distinguishes this guide-style lookup from sibling ticket/seating/tour tools by naming the exact questions it answers.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly says when to use it via example questions and defines coverage limits: only the 36 venues with UPFRONT guides, while other venues return a message listing covered venues. It also explains how the optional topics parameter narrows the answer versus returning every part.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources