Skip to main content
Glama

Network coverage

inventory
Read-onlyIdempotent

No account needed. As a guest (no audience on file): how much of the network is on sale today, per channel: approved creators, posts on sale at a current price, and whether coverage is strong or thin. Counts only, never a creator's identity. resolve_audience narrows it to an audience you describe; with an account it is measured against your own audience.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "inventory"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive/closed-world, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds real value beyond them: guest operation with no account, a privacy guarantee ('counts only, never a creator's identity'), and the semantic of the strong/thin coverage signal. It omits freshness, rate limits, and exact return shape.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is front-loaded with the key constraint ('No account needed') and every clause carries information. The colon-and-semicolon pileup makes it denser and harder to scan than ideal, which keeps it off a 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no parameters, the description must carry the return semantics, and it does so by enumerating per-channel counts and the coverage strength indicator. It also covers the guest/account/resolve_audience modes. Minor gaps remain around freshness and output format, but an agent can call this correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate at the argument level; baseline is 4. It does not need to compensate for any schema gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states what the tool reports: per-channel counts of approved creators and posts on sale at a current price, plus a strong/thin coverage signal. The resource is clear even though the verb is implicit (a read/aggregate rather than an action). It partially differentiates from the sibling resolve_audience by contrasting the whole-network guest view against a described audience.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives concrete routing guidance: no account needed for the whole-network guest view, and 'resolve_audience narrows it to an audience you describe; with an account it is measured against your own audience.' That names the alternative and the condition selecting it. There is no explicit when-not-to-use, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources