Skip to main content
Glama

List cases

list_cases
Read-onlyIdempotent

List published cases, most supported first, 50 per page.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "session": "<session>"
    },
    "name": "list_cases"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
offsetNo
sessionYesThe session value returned by enter.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, non-destructive and closed-world, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds real context beyond that: results are ordered 'most supported first' and returned 50 per page, which tells the agent this is a paginated ranked read. It stops short of saying whether more pages exist or what a case contains.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One short sentence, front-loaded with the verb and resource, with ordering and page size appended. Nothing is wasted and nothing needs reordering.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter read tool with no output schema, the description covers purpose, ordering and page size, but leaves the return shape of a case, the meaning of 'most supported', and how pagination ends unexplained. Adequate but with clear gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 50%: 'session' is documented in the schema, while 'offset' has no description anywhere. The '50 per page' statement lets an agent infer offset is a page counter, which is genuine added meaning, but the unit and paging termination condition remain unstated.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('List published cases') plus ordering and page size, which is clear. It does not differentiate from the sibling top_cases, which plausibly also ranks cases, so an agent cannot fully disambiguate from the name alone.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance and no mention of the sibling top_cases as an alternative. The only implied usage cue is 'published', leaving the choice between this and top_cases to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources