StudioSphere Pulse — Audio Intelligence

start_trial

Start a temporary, email-free Pulse trial. Returns a short-lived private API key with enough banked tokens for one short URL-based v1 analysis. No Stripe Checkout session is created. Store the key in the client or a trusted local environment; do not repost it in public logs, screenshots, GitHub issues, shared chats, or directory examples.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`error`	No	Machine-readable error code.
`api_key`	No	Temporary Pulse API key for the trial account. Treat as private; do not print it in public logs, screenshots, GitHub issues, shared chats, or directory examples.
`details`	No	Additional structured context from Pulse.
`message`	No	Human-readable recovery guidance.
`retryable`	No	Whether the caller may retry after changing state or waiting.
`expires_at`	No	ISO timestamp when the temporary key expires.
`usage_note`	No	Limits and usage guidance for the trial.
`account_type`	No	The account type created by this tool.
`analyze_path`	No	REST path for authenticated analysis.
`upgrade_path`	No	Path for converting to an account.
`banked_tokens`	No	Trial token balance granted.
`estimate_path`	No	REST path for free estimates.

TDQS

A4.7/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond annotations, the description discloses the key is short-lived, has banked tokens for one v1 analysis, and includes security guidance: store in trusted environment, don't post publicly. This adds meaningful context about the trial key's lifespan, token quota, and handling requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core purpose, followed by specific output details and security instructions. Each sentence adds distinct value; no redundant filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the zero-parameter signature and existing annotations (non-idempotent, non-read-only), the description is complete: it explains the trial's temporary nature, the key's capabilities, and important security practices. The output schema likely covers return format, so no additional return details are necessary.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has no parameters, so there are no parameter semantics to clarify. The description appropriately focuses on the tool's outcome and output rather than non-existent parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Start a temporary, email-free Pulse trial' and specifies the output: a short-lived private API key. It distinguishes from sibling tools by noting 'No Stripe Checkout session is created,' separating it from payment-related tools like purchase_token_pack and request_payment_link.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description conveys that this is for starting a trial without payment, contrasting with Stripe Checkout, but it doesn't explicitly name alternatives or provide when-not-to-use criteria. The context is clear enough for an agent to choose this over paid token acquisition, but explicit sibling references are absent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All StudioSphere Pulse — Audio Intelligence tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.5/5.0

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct role: cost estimation, analysis initiation, status polling, token balance, token pack listing/purchasing, payment linking, and trial creation. Even the two analysis-triggering tools (analyze_track and request_payment_link) are cleanly separated by account vs. non-account workflows.

Naming Consistency5/5

All eight tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., estimate_cost, list_token_packs, start_trial). The verbs are specific and predictable, and there are no mixed conventions or vague names.

Tool Count5/5

Eight tools strike a good balance for this domain: three cover the analysis pipeline (estimate, analyze, poll) and five cover billing/tokens/trial. Every tool serves a distinct purpose with no redundancy or bloat.

Completeness4/5

The set covers the full analysis workflow (cost estimation, submission, status polling) and token management (balance, packs, purchase, trial, payment link). A minor gap is the lack of job cancellation or historical job listing, but core user tasks are fully supported.

start_trial

Input Schema

Output Schema

TDQS

Glama MCP Gateway

TDQS

Resources