begin_registrationСоздаёт запрос регистрации без создания аккаунта. Пользователь обязательно сам подтверждает email по ссылке из письма; Telegram можно привязать позже.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | |||
| locale | No | ru | |
| telegram_username | No |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| data | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description discloses key behaviors beyond the annotations: no account is created ('без создания аккаунта'), the user must confirm email via a link ('Пользователь обязательно сам подтверждает email по ссылке из письма'), and Telegram can be linked later ('Telegram можно привязать позже'). These details add meaningful context about side effects and process flow that annotations do not provide.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two concise sentences with the primary purpose front-loaded in the first sentence. It avoids unnecessary repetition and includes essential behavioral caveats in the second sentence, making it efficient and well-structured.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description is adequate for a registration initiation tool, covering the creation of a request, email confirmation requirement, and optional Telegram linking. Given the presence of an output schema to explain return values, the description is mostly complete, though it could mention the follow-up tool (check_registration) for checking status; this is a minor gap.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema description coverage is 0%, and the description provides no additional meaning for the parameters (email, locale, telegram_username). It relies entirely on the input schema, which is insufficient given the low coverage; the description should compensate but does not.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states a specific action and resource: 'Создаёт запрос регистрации без создания аккаунта' (creates a registration request without creating an account), distinguishing it from a full account creation. It also differentiates from the sibling 'check_registration' by emphasizing the initiation of the process rather than status checking.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies when to use the tool (as the initial step of registration) by stating it creates a request, but it does not explicitly provide when-to-use/alternatives guidance or mention the sibling tool 'check_registration' for verifying status. The guidance is implied rather than explicit.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Most tools have distinct purposes, but a few pairs (check_registration vs get_account_profile, submit_link vs submit_order) overlap in scope. Descriptions clarify the differences (single vs bulk, status vs full profile), so confusion is limited.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (begin_registration, list_orders, update_link_draft). The only slight deviation is 'bulk_update_order_draft' with the 'bulk' modifier, but it still fits the overall pattern.
14 tools is well within the ideal range for a specialized service covering registration, orders, links, tariffs, and checkout. Each tool serves a distinct function without unnecessary bloat.
The core workflow (register, browse tariffs, manage order drafts, submit links) is well covered. Minor gaps like lack of explicit order creation or deletion are likely handled externally or via the checkout process, so agents can still complete key tasks.