scrapecreators_community_post_details
Community Post Details
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | The URL of the YouTube community post to get |
Community Post Details
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | The URL of the YouTube community post to get |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It reveals nothing about data returned, side effects, required permissions, or any constraints. The tool's behavior is completely opaque.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely short, but this is under-specification rather than effective conciseness. A single vague phrase cannot adequately describe the tool's function or usage.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity (1 parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description is still completely inadequate. It fails to explain what 'community post details' includes, how the output is structured, or how it differs from similar tools.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% for the single url parameter, which has a clear description. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Community Post Details' is a noun phrase that merely restates the tool name without a functional verb. It does not specify what action the tool performs (e.g., retrieve, scrape, get) or what 'details' entails, making it essentially a tautology.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With numerous sibling tools like scrapecreators_community, scrapecreators_post, and scrapecreators_community_tweets, there is no information to help an agent choose correctly.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.